The Pats signed Traylor, why didn't we?

[JoeJacksonTaylor28]

I saw that the Pats have signed Keith Traylor. I think very good about him and I think that we need a big tackle (and a pass rusher also). Why do you think the Redskins didn't even mention the guy?

[PA Skins Girl]

A little long in the tooth, probably (will be 35 in September). I think the focus was to get guys that will be here a few years.

[redwolf1218]

true! the oldest guy we have signed is brunell and he might be fine for the next 3 or 4 years. some qb's have their best years late into their 30's. everyone else has been 3 or more year deals, guys in their prime.

[JoeJacksonTaylor28]

I didn't know he was going to get 35. Then I can live with him in NE.

[badpigs442]

Team likes Noble anyway.

[CowboyKilla]

Old and an injury liability lately. No thanks.

[TexSkin]

Two words why we did not : Bruce Smith

[smoak]

two more words: deion sanders

i just want to go on record as saying that i was always against getting deion... bruce i thought was ok just a little over paid. the problem with bruce is that they never made him a situational pass rusher. it was painful watching him get dominated and just hang in to get the record.

[REDMAN]

Traylor is a little past his prime.

[Smiley]

smoakme - very painful to watch Bruce over the last couple of years.

[ShaggySkins]

We cannot sign every single FA defensive lineman like many of you seem to expect.