PDA

View Full Version : Another Trade of mine....HUGE.


¤Smooooot¤
07-30-2004, 09:37 AM
I think i got this one too.

smoak
07-30-2004, 09:41 AM
no way i'd want to give away LT, but mccardell is not even in camp so i voted for you.

¤Smooooot¤
07-30-2004, 09:50 AM
Yeah i got LT threw another trade and i really like him so it hurt but this trade really solidifies my team...before i had one huge star and a bunch of ok players....now i have a team of stars.

smoak
07-30-2004, 10:23 AM
no offense, but i am hoping TO gives you nothing this season! :)

that is why i haven't played FF in a long time b/c i kept getting stuck with guys i could not root for...

honestly, i like the trade for you as long as mcgahee isn't cutting into henry's carries. all three of those guys should put up big numbers, and i do not like brooks much at all.

akhhorus
07-30-2004, 10:35 AM
Whom ever got LT won this trade. TO gets good stats, but not dominating stats.

GolfFreak
07-30-2004, 11:05 AM
Yeah, the LT team won (think that wasnt' you) ... no way TO makes you better than having LT. Sorry!

IndianBaller27
07-30-2004, 11:42 AM
Whom ever got LT won this trade. TO gets good stats, but not dominating stats.
ditto

RedskinRyan
07-30-2004, 01:02 PM
i think TO can make up the difference for what you lose from LT that mccardell couldnt give you. also, i dont like brooks.

Booser
07-30-2004, 02:05 PM
RB is the most important position in FFL, so trading LT for Henry is not a good move regardless of WR upgrades. WR and QB's are a dime a dozen, and Brady doesn't put up huge fantasy numbers.

akhhorus
07-30-2004, 02:12 PM
RB is the most important position in FFL, so trading LT for Henry is not a good move regardless of WR upgrades. WR and QB's are a dime a dozen, and Brady doesn't put up huge fantasy numbers.

brady had 3600 yards and 20+ tds last year. He's not a 1st line QB FFLwise, but he's pretty good.

¤Smooooot¤
07-30-2004, 03:25 PM
Im sorry but if u disagreed with me....ur wrong. First, LT for henry is not a good move but Brady for Brooks is.....and TO for McCardell is huge on my side. Yes he got a good move in Henry for LT but i got a bigger steal in TO for McCardell and Brady for Brooks......

padraic
07-30-2004, 04:13 PM
you asked for us to help u out and then reject it, sorry you did not like what people said but the fact remains that LT is priceless............. :cry:

¤Smooooot¤
07-30-2004, 05:46 PM
i respect ur opinions....i just think that henry is a good back and i liked my side. LT is probaly the best RB in football....but im the type of person that is open to trading anyone.....noone is priceless as long as i got fair deal.

ArRiNgToN_56
07-30-2004, 09:54 PM
You got Ripped, i would have never ever made that trade for four reasons

1. Tomlinson is the best back stats wise in football he will see more of the ball than anyone because his team blows

2. Henry will share carries with Willis. Why? Because Henry is FA next season and the Bills are looking at McGahee to be the RB of the future there.

3. TO will not do well in Philly.

4. McCardell Will be #1 WR in Bucs Land thus his stats may go up a great deal from last season. (if he comes to camp)

LATrueRedskin
07-31-2004, 12:29 AM
You shouldn't have gotten rid of LT. Trust me. I just traded him for Ricky Williams and Marvin Harrison, and look what happened. It's just bad luck to trade him.

¤Smooooot¤
07-31-2004, 09:04 AM
Whatever.....I did the trade for these 5 good reasons.

1. Brooks is no where near Brady....every year Brady puts up great #'s and on every fantasy book i have seen this year they think Brooks is up for a bad year.

2. Henry will not share enough carries with willis to where it hurts him enough fantasy wise.

3. TO will not struggle no matter how much u want him to.....ur a fool if u think he will not put up good number with McNabb....thats ridiculous.

4. I had Culpepper and i traded him......I had LT and i traded him.....i dont sit there and say someone is to good to be traded because its about a full team...not one player.

5. McCardell is holding out and when he does come back it just wont be the same....he will have a bad year. If you think thats stupid look at what u said about TO doin bad in philly lol...wow.

Some may think that i got ripped but the truth is i like the deal and im makin my team how i like it.

ArRiNgToN_56
07-31-2004, 09:22 AM
Whatever.....I did the trade for these 5 good reasons.

1. Brooks is no where near Brady....every year Brady puts up great #'s and on every fantasy book i have seen this year they think Brooks is up for a bad year.

2. Henry will not share enough carries with willis to where it hurts him enough fantasy wise.

3. TO will not struggle no matter how much u want him to.....ur a fool if u think he will not put up good number with McNabb....thats ridiculous.

4. I had Culpepper and i traded him......I had LT and i traded him.....i dont sit there and say someone is to good to be traded because its about a full team...not one player.

5. McCardell is holding out and when he does come back it just wont be the same....he will have a bad year. If you think thats stupid look at what u said about TO doin bad in philly lol...wow.

Some may think that i got ripped but the truth is i like the deal and im makin my team how i like it.

I'm not sure about the Brooks Brady thing however....

1. Henry Will Share carries with my Boy Willis and i wouldn't be surprised to see Willis Usurp the job from him thats how much i believe in Willis McGahee. I don't know if you watch any College football but Willis McGahee is an incredible back and your stupid to say otherwise if the Bills didn't see anything in him than why in gods name would they not sign Henry to a Contract? IT just doesn't make any sense. Willis McGahee will share Carries with Travis Henry.

2. I don't think TO will do that well in Philly, not nessicarily because of McNabb but because i can just see Ray Lewis stabbing him.

3. In fantasy football its all about those "one players" last year and the year before it was Priestly Holmes who carried any team he was on Don't you remember any of those teams that made it to the FFB playoffs because they had Holmes on there team and really nothing else.

4. Why would you trade Daunte and Tomlinson? You'd have had one of the best teams in your league.

Brady and Henry Vs Culpepper and Tomlinson
Sure you got TO but recievers are really the most consistent position in FFB.

Some may think that i got ripped but the truth is i like the deal and im makin my team how i like it

Some? 10 people over 3 one of which was you. You can make they team anyway you want, i could care less but if you didn't want peoples opinions you shouldn't have made a topic with a poll asking how well you did on the trade.

¤Smooooot¤
07-31-2004, 10:04 AM
I didnt have Culpepper and LT at the same time....i would have kept that. I got LT in a trade that i gave up Culpepper.

JoeJacksonTaylor28
07-31-2004, 04:25 PM
You got Ripped, i would have never ever made that trade for four reasons

1. Tomlinson is the best back stats wise in football he will see more of the ball than anyone because his team blows

2. Henry will share carries with Willis. Why? Because Henry is FA next season and the Bills are looking at McGahee to be the RB of the future there.

3. TO will not do well in Philly.

4. McCardell Will be #1 WR in Bucs Land thus his stats may go up a great deal from last season. (if he comes to camp)
I agree with you Arrington56.

You got burned Smoot!

If you don't like probable negative opinions, don't open your own things to them.

IndianBaller27
08-02-2004, 05:00 PM
I think you should go with w/e akhhorus says. He's a FF genius.