PDA

View Full Version : Skinfanjon's game tape review, week 2


skinfanjon
08-24-2005, 12:46 PM
Main Entry: 1trust 1.
Pronunciation: 'tr&st
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, probably of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse traust trust; akin to Old English trEowe faithful -- more at TRUE
1 a : assured reliance on the character, ability, strength, or truth of someone or something b : one in which confidence is placed
2 a : dependence on something future or contingent : HOPE b : reliance on future payment for property (as merchandise) delivered : CREDIT
3 a : a property interest held by one person for the benefit of another b : a combination of firms or corporations formed by a legal agreement; especially : one that reduces or threatens to reduce competition
4 archaic : TRUSTWORTHINESS
5 a (1) : a charge or duty imposed in faith or confidence or as a condition of some relationship (2) : something committed or entrusted to one to be used or cared for in the interest of another b : responsible charge or office c : CARE, CUSTODY <the child committed to her trust>
- in trust : in the care or possession of a trustee

Trust. Trust is something almost everyone of us have in Joe Gibbs. It is formed from the ashes of three Super Bowl victories, and countless regular season triumphs. It is also a pre-requisite for success in the NFL. Without an owners trust in his coaching staff, or a coaches trust in his players, or a players trust in another player, victory is hard to come by, nearly impossible. Trust is something the Redskins have lacked for some time now. Last season, the lack of trust was rampant. It was clear Gibbs didn’t trust Brunell early in the season, and it also he didn’t trust Ramsey late in the season. Offensively, there was a lack of trust amongst the players as well. Portis did not trust his blocking; Ramsey did not trust his protection, or his receivers; the wide receivers did not trust their quarterback. With this sort of second guessing, one can only expect to fail. Which we did. Moral victories are only worth so much, and close losses are worth nothing.

Now, fast forward to preseason, 2005. Trust is something being built. Suddenly, the offensive line trusts itself. Dockery trusts Rabach to pull his weight, something Raymer failed to do last season. Thomas trusts Jansen to maintain his blocks, something Ray Brown (the ageless wonder, respectively) was unable to do consistently at this late stage of his career. Samuels trusts his fellow dirtbags, and Jansen is trusting his achilles. By trusting the guy next to you, you are free to focus on your own responsibilities. By forming trust, you form a bond. You form a group whose individual talents pale in comparison to the accomplishments as a unit. You begin to form a team, in the true sense of the word.

After performing a post mortem on last weeks game, I see trust as the most critical factor to this unborn season. On the surface it would appear that the most important element would be Gibbs’ trust in Ramsey. Although that may be true, that trust or lack there of will be formed based on the play of the o-line; so far, so good. After dominating one of the top defensive lines in all of football a week ago (Panthers), the Skins came home to find a less intimidating foe next in line. Dominance was expected, and that is what we receive. On paper it wasn’t as pretty. Last week Ramsey was not sacked and only hit twice; this week he was sacked twice and hit four times. However, one also must consider the amount of deep shots we took during each respective game to reach any logical conclusion.

After a close examination, Jon Jansen wins this weeks award for best lineman. Jansen was flawless throughout the game, and dominant at times. Last week, he appeared to be testing out his “new legs”; he struggled at times in isolated pass protection, though overall he played well. This week, he completely eliminated the Bengals top pass rusher from a year ago, Justin Smith. On the first sack of the game, a third and 5 from our own end of the field, Jansen took his man completely out of the play using great leverage, then successfully picked up a corner blitz. Though the rush was still able to find Ramsey, Jansen was clearly not at fault. On the next possession, again on third down (and 7), Jansen teamed with Dockery and Samuels to snuff out a stunt from the defensive line as well as a blitz bringing two linebackers. Again, Jansen took out two players, allowing Ramsey to step up in the pocket with ease, though he overthrew an open Patten. It was Jansen leading the way on an end around for Moss, showing his athleticism, though it was only a short gain. It was Jansen walling off the right side on an off tackle run by Betts, clearing the way for a 15 yard gain. Aside form the outstanding individual efforts, he played with power and skill throughout the contest. As I said, he was never beaten off the snap, never allowed his man to make the tackle, and never allowed any pressure on Ramsey. He appeared to find confidence in his rehabilitated lower leg, and the difference was clear. News flash folks: Jon Jansen is the leader of this line, and he is absolutely back to form.

Next up is Randy Thomas, as he also had a near flawless game. Thomas, a former pro bowler, has played well in his years in Washington but has never really been dominate in any particular area. That is, until Friday. Thomas was matched up against Bryan Robinson most of the contest, and he simply took him to school. On a first and ten from around the 35, he simply manhandled Robinson, turning him inside and driving him left until passing him off to Rabach. After finishing that block, he moved on to the linebacker sliding into the vacated space, and turned him inside also. This allowed a nice six yard pickup by Betts, and if Moss had held his block, it would have gone for at least 15 or 20. On another first down, again from around the 35, the call was a counter right, with Dockery pulling. Thomas combined with Jansen to completely seal off the trenches, allowing Dockery to get around with ease and help Betts pick up 15 yards. Those were the sort of plays last year we struggled with, as there was usually too much penetration and congestion for the back to get around the corner. This season, it appears Portis (once he is playing) will be able to reach the edge with ease, and that spells trouble. Aside from these individual efforts, Thomas was flawless in his pass protection, was able to get a good push off the line, and even made it too the second level of the defense once or twice. This was a match up he should have owned, and clearly he did his part.

As for the rest of the line, Dockery, Smauels and Rabach all played very well. Dockery was again outstanding, though this time he did make a couple of mistakes. He was beaten twice off the snap, as both times his man (John Thornton) got an excellent jump. But he managed to recover well, and was only responsible for Ramsey taking a hit once. That hit came just after Ramsey released the ball, and it was the long completion to Patten between two defenders, a forty yard gain. Though he did have the mistakes, he was dominant in picking up the blitz. Once a blitzing safety was completely swallowed up by the massive Dockery, something Theisman pointed out to everyone from the booth. Bostic commented that it “was unfair”. He also snuffed out a stunt/corner blitz on a third and seven, giving Ramsey plenty of time to check down to an open underneath receiver, though Betts plain out dropped the pass that should have been for a first. On the old school roll left protection plays we all remember from the Gibbs of old, Dockery did an excellent job of selling the play and then turning his man inside, completely sealing off the play and giving Ramsey time to throw. One of the results was a touchdown pass to Thrash in the back of the endzone. As for Samuels he looked slow (again) a couple of times off the snap, but other than that his technique was flawless. He was the cause of a sack when Gathers got a great jump and came flying around the end, forcing Ramsey to step into a blitzing LB. However he was excellent once he engaged his man, and was not beaten with any power moves. He used leverage consistently, and used his hands to keep space and direct his defender as well as I’ve ever seen him in the past. Rabach was pushed back a couple of times, but nothing to the extent of what we saw last season. He has shown good recovery skills in both games when beaten, showing his effort and desire to not give up on a play. He also has done an excellent job of recognizing blitz packages, and making the proper adjustments. For all the different looks Cincy brought (quite a few for preseason), there were no unblocked shots at Ramsey. Overall, I give the entire unit a grade of A-. Individually: Jansen an A+, Thomas an A, Samuels, Dockery, Rabach a B+. Excellent job all around.

Now, back to this trust thing. In a player/coach relationship, trust is never more evident than in play selection. If a coach trusts his QB, he will allow him to throw deep and make decisions on the field. If there is a lack of trust, the play calling will resemble the 2004 Redskins. Ultra-conservative. Because it is still preseason, it is impossible to gauge what amount of trust Gibbs has in Ramsey, as we are clearly trying a lot of different passing options at this early stage of the season. But if Ramsey wants to be allowed a little slack, he will absolutely need to eliminate these silly turnovers.

skinfanjon
08-24-2005, 12:47 PM
First of all, it’s not as bad as everyone thinks. Ramsey did a lot of great things in this game. He began to trust his offensive line, and his footwork settled down as a result. He became more comfortable, stepped up in the pocket, and delivered the ball with power a great majority of the time. Occasionally, he danced around too much, but this simply was not the Ramsey of old. On one play, he read the defense, saw single coverage on Moss, audibled to a fly route, and stuck it right on the money. Never mind that Moss lost it in the lights...we only have two night games this year anyway. It was the recognition and confidence that impressed me, not to mention the touch. Touch you say? What about the two interceptions you say? Well, they were inexcusable. But not unexplainable. Both interceptions occurred immediately after long bombs delivered by Ramsey. The first came one play after a forty yard completion to Patten, the second came the very next play after another great catch by Patten, this time a corner route when he expertly tapped his toe before going out of bounds. Both plays were big gains, and Patrick got a little animated. It appears both were simply examples of him getting excited and getting too pumped up on his next throws....just like last year in the Eagles game at home. The good news is, Patrick was faced with the same sort of situation late in the first half, and he passed the test perfectly. After two straight completions to begin the drive, Ramsey dropped back, looking for someone in the end zone. When nothing materialized, instead of riding his adrenaline from the previous plays and forcing something, he calmly tucked the ball, ran forward a bit, and flipped it to Rock Cartwright on the ugliest option play ever, for a seven yard gain. Ugly, but smart. This is what we need to see from Ramsey more than anything, the willingness to accept what the defense gives us. If he can continue to make these sort of plays, along with the big plays that are there (190 yards in a half is incredible), then we are in good shape. Pittsburgh will be a great test this week, as he will have to settle for the shorter plays more often. He really needs to finish this game without an interception, Gibbs has been preaching it all week.

Other bright spots offensively were Nemo Broughton, who apparently is our new short yardage back and can even catch coming out of the backfield. It was simply a great game from him, with the exception of the fumble. David Patten exceeded all expectations, Antonio Brown continues to play well at wide receiver, Rock Cartwright still thinks he has a chance to make this team, and Santana Moss is really fast. The losers this week were Dmac, Kevin Dyson (ghost), and Ray Brown....I love you Ray, but it was sad to see you trip over your own feet pulling around the end for Rock.

As for a quick look at the defense, the verdict is in: No cause for concern. The run defense is every bit as good as last year, and we appear to have depth along the defensive line. While there is still the lack of a pure pass rushing defensive end, Daniels (who forced an INT with his pressure) and Wynn are adequate, and Demetric Evans was everywhere in the second half. Griffin and Salavea got great push and clogged the middle all night long, and Marcus Washington and Warrick Holdman played extremely well, always flying around the ball. Another standout was Pierson Prioleau, again. The guy was everywhere, and he will be called upon quite frequently this year, particularly against the run. Shawn Springs is as dominate as he was a year ago, and he should make a strong bid for the Prow Bowl. As for depth, Clifton Smith and Ryan Boscetti had solid efforts, and seem poised to contribute. Disappointing performances from Omar Stoutmire (again), Garnell Wilds (again), and Carlos Rogers, though Rogers will be fine once he gets in shape. Also Chris Clemons really hurt his chances for playing time with a couple of stupid penalties, on the same play no less. Ade Jimoh earned himself a stay of execution this week, with several solid tackles and no real errors in coverage. Rufus Brown was a ghost, and may be appearing on milk cartons all across the DC metropolitan area very soon.

Overall, there is plenty too be excited about folks. I like the way this team is taking shape, and it will continue to improve. The key is trust, and if these guys can earn Gibbs’, then they have truly accomplished something. A turnover free ball game against Pittsburgh this week sure would go a long way toward earning that trust.

chrisbcbu
08-24-2005, 01:10 PM
Really great analysis. I was looking forward to it this time! I hope ur right that Ramsey is starting to trust the Line. I just hope the WR trust the QB to get them the ball.

bwparker
08-24-2005, 01:13 PM
Really great analysis. I was looking forward to it this time! I hope ur right that Ramsey is starting to trust the Line. I just hope the WR trust the QB to get them the ball.
I'm about to start reading this...But I applaud you already for the sheer length of it:D

chrisbcbu
08-24-2005, 01:17 PM
I'm about to start reading this...But I applaud you already for the sheer length of it:D

hehe well when ur boss is coming it makes it hard to read or write on the internet! :D

bwparker
08-24-2005, 01:23 PM
hehe well when ur boss is coming it makes it hard to read or write on the internet! :D
I really meant that for skinfanjon..oops...but I'm having the same issue, which is why I cut and paste everything into word and read it there...its less obvious ;)

good analysis. Starting this weekend, I'm going to be taping the games and analyzing them myself. I think it'll be really helpful for me to understand what is happening better.

redskin_rich
08-24-2005, 01:30 PM
Nice work again skinfanjon!
I appreciate you doing these since I would never re-watch a game. No interest, I can't even watch a taped game if I already know the result.

chrisbcbu
08-24-2005, 01:35 PM
Nice work again skinfanjon!
I appreciate you doing these since I would never re-watch a game. No interest, I can't even watch a taped game if I already know the result.

Really? i do it all the time. I like to analyze as well. But being geo-challenged i dont get to see the games. But i will be watching this Friday!

flave1969
08-24-2005, 01:40 PM
Fantastic analysis Jon. I really appreciate the effort you put into this. Luckily I am going too be able to watch this Fridays game so I will be studying hard myself.

Thank you again.

redskin_rich
08-24-2005, 01:43 PM
Really? i do it all the time. I like to analyze as well. But being geo-challenged i dont get to see the games. But i will be watching this Friday!
Yeah, I've tried but I can't. There have been times that I had to miss the game because of work and my wife has taped it for me but knowing the result, I had no interest in watching.
Also I attend most of the home games and you see a lot more, when you can see the whole field, than what you see through a camera lens. I make my analysis on what I see, when I see it. I might miss a few finer points on negligible plays but I'm not worried about that. Besides, we have great members here that can fill in the blanks. :typeR2:

openallnight
08-24-2005, 01:46 PM
Another excellent write up SFJ!!!
Another positive appraisal of Jansen and Dock!
I know it's only preseason but, ladies and gentleman if this line keeps up this effort our offense will be lighting up scoreboards this year.

smoak
08-24-2005, 01:47 PM
Great job skinfanjon!!!

I love watching tape (moreso from wins), but games are rarely on in my area.

The Skinsinator
08-24-2005, 01:53 PM
Great job SkinFanJon! I really enjoy your attention to detail and hope you have a write up after all the games. A couple of things after closely scrutinizing our quarterbacks, who do you really feel would be better for the entire year Ram or Brunnel? I'm not trying to start a qb controversy, just would like your two cents.

Battle Cat
08-24-2005, 01:54 PM
I have not been able to see all of the games. Can anyone give me a report card on Phillip Daniels? We really need him to provide some kind of pass rush this year.

Ibleedburgundy
08-24-2005, 01:59 PM
Thanks Jon. That was very insightful. Go Dirtbags.

JoeDaSchmoe
08-24-2005, 02:05 PM
Jon, again, amazing job, especially for all us nuts out there who would watch tape ourselves but can't get the VCR to work (I know, I know, get TiVo....). Excellent analysis of every part of the same. Keep up the focus on the O-line, it's the most important part of this offense.

:awesomewo

skinfanjon
08-24-2005, 02:18 PM
Great job SkinFanJon! I really enjoy your attention to detail and hope you have a write up after all the games. A couple of things after closely scrutinizing our quarterbacks, who do you really feel would be better for the entire year Ram or Brunnel? I'm not trying to start a qb controversy, just would like your two cents.

Im still in Ramsey's camp, I actually left out Brunell on purpose. Like it or not, he is the guy we are starting the season with, so we need to rally behind him. I think it is unfair to elavate Brunell in the depth chart based on a couple of preseason mop up jobs, especially after last season. He has shown better zip and mobility however, so we have a capable backup quaterback should something happen. I really like the way Ramsey played last week though, if he can just calm himself after a big play. For those of you who are golfers, you understand what it is like to hit a mammouth drive, dead middle of the fairway, and then get greedy on the appraoch shot and end up with a double bogey. Ramsey has that problem, he just gets so wound up from the previous plays that forces things on the next. Whether he can correct it or not, we shall see.

skinfanjon
08-24-2005, 02:22 PM
I have not been able to see all of the games. Can anyone give me a report card on Phillip Daniels? We really need him to provide some kind of pass rush this year.

Daniels played well Friday, but he seems to get too far upfield on his pass rushes at times, which expose us to the delay's and screen passes. It cost us once against the Bengals, and that is the sort of thing coaches can see on film and take advantage of against us. But he did get decent pressure, and the Rogers pick was a result of Daniels breathing down Palmer's neck, forcing a quick throw. So he did make an impact.....now if he can only stay healthy.

Overall, I give him a B- for the preseason thus far, but that is a solid effort. If we got that sort of production from him over the course of a whole season, it would certainly help out the D. I love our depth though across the board at DL, we have a lot of options (aside from a pure pass rushing DE)

JWsleep
08-24-2005, 04:47 PM
Great report and analysis, skinfanjon! Thanks!

Brokenstriker
08-24-2005, 05:31 PM
thank you!!

too good to be free ...

skins74
08-24-2005, 05:42 PM
Good writing, good name (although your missing an H). I agree that Ramsey is getting more comfortable and its obvious that has to do with trusting the line more. What I love about Nemo is when he is about to get hit he gets real, real low and knocks the crap out of the defender. More guys should run like that its all about leverage.

whistleandthumb
08-24-2005, 05:46 PM
Another great breakdown for ol' SFJ. Man, your writing is 10 times better than that of most of the writers at the Post!! Keep the great analysis coming!! :)

ihatedallas
08-24-2005, 05:54 PM
Thank you very much, i enjoyed that alot...

firehawk157
08-24-2005, 06:06 PM
Im still in Ramsey's camp, I actually left out Brunell on purpose. Like it or not, he is the guy we are starting the season with, so we need to rally behind him. I think it is unfair to elavate Brunell in the depth chart based on a couple of preseason mop up jobs, especially after last season. He has shown better zip and mobility however, so we have a capable backup quaterback should something happen. I really like the way Ramsey played last week though, if he can just calm himself after a big play. For those of you who are golfers, you understand what it is like to hit a mammouth drive, dead middle of the fairway, and then get greedy on the appraoch shot and end up with a double bogey. Ramsey has that problem, he just gets so wound up from the previous plays that forces things on the next. Whether he can correct it or not, we shall see.

Preach on Brother Jon! Seriously, I'm very encouraged by Ramsey's progress. Everyone says he threw two picks and all this other crap. Your right, he did. But like Jon said, he just got overexcited and tossed it. I think he's learned his lesson now (I guarantee you Gibbs was none too kind in practice this week) and won't get too wound up this time around. Otherwise, his passing was relatively accurate and to me, looked pretty good. I think had this been a real game, that last drive in the half, we would have gotten in there for 6. Or at least taken another shot at the endzone. I'm anxious to see how the offense does against the #1 defense. Should be a good test.
Something I think not many people looked at, is the patchwork that Gibbs did in the offseason. Unlike nowadays, where the running philosophy is pick up the best players and try to work out a scheme around them, I think Gibbs had a good idea of what he wanted his team to look like and picked up players that fit the MO. Me likey, very sneaky!

dabro
08-24-2005, 07:18 PM
Another great breakdown for ol' SFJ. Man, your writing is 10 times better than that of most of the writers at the Post!! Keep the great analysis coming!! :)

Amen!

NCskinsfanatic
08-24-2005, 07:35 PM
Thanks Jon, you're two for two man, nice analysis. I appreciate you sharing it with us, I didn't get to see the Bengals-Redskins game this past week, so it means that much more to me. I hope you're right about Ramsey, I don't question whether or not he has the physical skills to get the job done. But as Jeff George proved, that's not enough.....lol. Brunell has looked pretty good from what I've seen and read here, while we're all still hoping Ramsey comes around, but I do trust that Gibbs will start the best QB against Da Bears........

GoDannyBoy
08-24-2005, 08:07 PM
Thanks great writing. The Line is going to make the season for us.

BIGSEF3
08-24-2005, 09:23 PM
I'm about to start reading this...But I applaud you already for the sheer length of it:D

my sentiments exactly!

redskin_rich
08-24-2005, 10:25 PM
Skinfanjon-
Now that you've started this, may I ask that you continue this throughout the season? You do an excellent job of breaking things down and I am sure that all would appreciate your game analysis on a weekly basis. I know that I would.

skinfanjon
08-24-2005, 11:13 PM
Skinfanjon-
Now that you've started this, may I ask that you continue this throughout the season? You do an excellent job of breaking things down and I am sure that all would appreciate your game analysis on a weekly basis. I know that I would.

I would be more than happy to do so. I really enjoy analyzing the film and putting my thoughts on paper. Since everyone else seems to enjoy reading them, I will keep them coming. If you want to PM any suggestions or things you would like me to look for, feel free to do so. That goes for everyone else as well. Thanks for the kind words Rich, much appreciated.

CowboyKilla
08-25-2005, 05:27 AM
thanks dude your insight is much appreciated. Trust is a key ingredient.

ppease
08-25-2005, 09:10 AM
Thanks again for your analysis. I don't get the pre-season games in my local (will see next one on FOX though). I really like your focus on the OL. I think that our success depends on how well the OL plays especially with allowing the QB time to go deep.

On offense, the other area of focus I'd like to know about is Patrick telegraphing where he is going with the ball or is he doing better at scanning the field.