View Full Version : Johnson Calls Out Smoot
smoak
09-13-2005, 09:53 AM
After whipping up on Bailey last year, it looks like Chad Johnson has his sights set on another ex-Redskins CB.
http://www.daytondailynews.com/sports/content/sports/bengals/daily/0913bengals.html
danny's stogie
09-13-2005, 10:09 AM
After whipping up on Bailey last year, it looks like Chad Johnson has his sights set on another ex-Redskins CB.
http://www.daytondailynews.com/sports/content/sports/bengals/daily/0913bengals.html
That's funny, because I doubt Smoot will be matched up against Pepto.
The Skinsinator
09-13-2005, 10:32 AM
Johnson can back up his smack better than Fred. Dude is bad. From game 1, it looks like Fred's addition didn't help too much. I do enjoy Fred's talk and wish him well except when he plays us.
GolfFreak
09-13-2005, 10:49 AM
I don't think Smoot can handle CJ! Smoot always got the #2 receiver, before Champ had the #1 and then Springs. I'd like to see him go against a top receiver to see if he has the stuff, but I don't think the result would be in his favor.
akhhorus
09-13-2005, 10:52 AM
That's funny, because I doubt Smoot will be matched up against Pepto.
Smoot couldn't handle Houzaofinrwofviwnrgoignoergnieorgn last year either. Whats next, is Chad going to call out Walt Harris and Barry Wilburn?
HAWGZHEAD
09-13-2005, 11:36 AM
Houzaofinrwofviwnrgoignoergnieorgn You left off the a at the end. :)
Smoot couldn't handle Houzaofinrwofviwnrgoignoergnieorgn last year either. Whats next, is Chad going to call out Walt Harris and Barry Wilburn?
Who's that?
ihatedallas
09-13-2005, 01:45 PM
Minnesota couldnt stop Tampa...Cinci is going to light them up. Chad probabally will light smoot up, if Winfields not covering them. Minnesotas one of those teams that always looks good on paper...then they play, and your like whhhhaaa?
PyroGenic
09-13-2005, 01:57 PM
Minnesota couldnt stop Tampa...Cinci is going to light them up. Chad probabally will light smoot up, if Winfields not covering them. Minnesotas one of those teams that always looks good on paper...then they play, and your like whhhhaaa?
they're gonna suck this year because they lost their center.
CarMike
09-13-2005, 02:09 PM
I know which game i'll be watching Sunday! :)
danny's stogie
09-13-2005, 02:11 PM
they're gonna suck this year because they lost their center.
Talent wise they could be very good, but they could go 5-11 because they have a bafoon coaching them.
PyroGenic
09-13-2005, 02:48 PM
Talent wise they could be very good, but they could go 5-11 because they have a bafoon coaching them.
if they want to become a run oriented offense than it doesn't really matter how much talent they have at RB or WR. Without that probowl center leading the line, the line is going to suck and the running game/pass blocking is going to suck plain and simple. Think of it as how our offensive line sucked so bad with Jansen gone and multiply it by 2.
danny's stogie
09-13-2005, 02:53 PM
if they want to become a run oriented offense than it doesn't really matter how much talent they have at RB or WR. Without that probowl center leading the line, the line is going to suck and the running game/pass blocking is going to suck plain and simple. Think of it as how our offensive line sucked so bad with Jansen gone and multiply it by 2.
I don't deny that losing Birk is big, but every team has injuries...good teams overcome them.
smoak
09-13-2005, 03:12 PM
Talent wise they could be very good, but they could go 5-11 because they have a bafoon coaching them.
I agree here. I am not a huge Tice fan. That team always seems poised to make the playoffs and either misses or back doors it.
smoak
09-13-2005, 03:13 PM
I don't deny that losing Birk is big, but every team has injuries...good teams overcome them.
I agree here, but I would say that GREAT teams overcome them. A lot of really good teams get derailed by injuries.
IMALILTEAPOT
09-13-2005, 03:31 PM
i love johnson, but i hope smoot shuts him down
ihatedallas
09-13-2005, 03:46 PM
I like Johnson..flat out trash talker like Meshawn...yet backs it up every sunday...UNlike Meshawn...
chrisbcbu
09-20-2005, 01:49 PM
Well i guess smoot didnt do much against Johnson! LOL
Smoot was asked whats wrong with the team. "I can't tell you, baby," cornerback Fred Smoot said. "That's a question you'll have to ask Dr. Phil."
Smoot left washington(top 3 defense) and went to Minny(bottom 3 defense)
BurgundyNGold
09-20-2005, 02:28 PM
Well i guess smoot didnt do much against Johnson! LOL
Smoot was asked whats wrong with the team. "I can't tell you, baby," cornerback Fred Smoot said. "That's a question you'll have to ask Dr. Phil."
Smoot left washington(top 3 defense) and went to Minny(bottom 3 defense)
Maybe it's because the players on the team are too much about the $ and not enough about the W.
Santheb
09-20-2005, 02:30 PM
Maybe it's because the players on the team are too much about the $ and not enough about the W.
Daunte cares too much about rolling the bread and throwing INTs.
ShaggySkins
09-20-2005, 08:32 PM
I think Chad Johnson is probably one of the top 3 or 4 recievers in the league. Right after Owens and Moss I think Chad is there on the same level as Marvin Harrison and Hines Ward.
Smoot is a quality corner but Johnson is just far and away a better player. I love Smoot but he wasn't worth the money he was asking for and this defense looks just as good without him.
BurgundyNGold
09-20-2005, 08:51 PM
I think Chad Johnson is probably one of the top 3 or 4 recievers in the league. Right after Owens and Moss I think Chad is there on the same level as Marvin Harrison and Hines Ward.
Smoot is a quality corner but Johnson is just far and away a better player. I love Smoot but he wasn't worth the money he was asking for and this defense looks just as good without him.
Hear, hear. And yet, do you think the FO will get any love on this or will everything just be attributed to GW's genius -- or more likely just be ignored altogether?
PyroGenic
09-20-2005, 09:11 PM
Hear, hear. And yet, do you think the FO will get any love on this or will everything just be attributed to GW's genius -- or more likely just be ignored altogether?
the second one
The Skinsinator
09-21-2005, 04:47 PM
Hear, hear. And yet, do you think the FO will get any love on this or will everything just be attributed to GW's genius -- or more likely just be ignored altogether?
Yes, probably the second one. However, it was a very good decision by the FO and Gibbs. They didn't give it in, and Minny overpaid for him. Antonio is doing a very good job in NY though.
vBulletin® v3.6.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.