PDA

View Full Version : Cheney 'Authorized' Libby to Leak Classified Information


Spence
02-09-2006, 02:20 PM
This is sometimes called The Ollie North Defense:
Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, testified to a federal grand jury that he had been "authorized" by Cheney and other White House "superiors" in the summer of 2003 to disclose classified information to journalists to defend the Bush administration's use of prewar intelligence in making the case to go to war with Iraq, according to attorneys familiar with the matter, and to court records.

Libby specifically claimed that in one instance he had been authorized to divulge portions of a then-still highly classified National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear weapons, according to correspondence recently filed in federal court by special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

Beyond what was stated in the court paper, say people with firsthand knowledge of the matter, Libby also indicated what he will offer as a broad defense during his upcoming criminal trial: that Vice President Cheney and other senior Bush administration officials had earlier encouraged and authorized him to share classified information with journalists to build public support for going to war. Later, after the war began in 2003, Cheney authorized Libby to release additional classified information, including details of the NIE, to defend the administration's use of prewar intelligence in making the case for war.
...
Libby is also accused of telling journalists that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, had worked for the CIA. Libby and other Bush administration officials believed that if Plame played a role in the selection of her husband for the Niger mission, that fact might discredit him.

A federal grand jury indicted Libby on October 28, 2005, on five counts of making false statements, perjury, and obstruction of justice, alleging that he concealed his role in leaking information about Plame to the media.
...
The public correspondence does not mention the identities of the "superiors" who authorized the leaking of the classified information, but people with firsthand knowledge of the matter identified one of them as Cheney. Libby also testified that he worked closely with then-Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove in deciding what information to leak to the press to build public support for the war, and later, postwar, to defend the administration's use of prewar intelligence.Source (http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2006/0209nj1.htm)

Axegrinder
02-09-2006, 02:22 PM
There is no defense for Ollie North.

BurgundyNGold
02-09-2006, 02:34 PM
This town is great. Nobody ever has to take responsibility for anything.

RedskinsDave
02-09-2006, 02:52 PM
This town is great. Nobody ever has to take responsibility for anything.

That's just not true. It has to reach the appropriately low level or disappear and then responsibility is taken.

BurgundyNGold
02-09-2006, 02:53 PM
That's just not true. It has to reach the appropriately low level or disappear and then responsibility is taken.
LOL, you're right. You have to be a GS-10 or and E-5 or below to actually take the heat. :)

Agrawog
02-10-2006, 07:57 AM
Here's my question on this topic: Besides Cheney who were Libby's 'superiors'? I don't know the org chart of the WH but there can't be too many people who would be considered superiors to him other than Cheney, Bush, and maybe the WH COS, right?

I mean if any of these guys 'authorized' the release it would be pretty bad for the administration, yes?

Also, if Libby were given authorization then should Fitzgerald be going after that person or persons as well? I understand that 'following orders' is not a defense but whomever gave the order should also get indicted, correct?

I don't really understand where we are in the investigation as a whole. Is Libby the highest domino? Is Fitzgerald still pursuing the overall investigation while charging Libby and maybe trying to turn him?

This whole thing is sordid.

CNYSkinFan
02-10-2006, 08:12 AM
The question is can Libby use Cheney as a defense and then Cheney use L:ibby as a scapegoat. I think he can and will and will probably escape again.

OCSkinzFan
02-10-2006, 09:01 PM
The question is can Libby use Cheney as a defense and then Cheney use L:ibby as a scapegoat. I think he can and will and will probably escape again.
Do you mean ah la the Ronnie-n-Ollie ring of unbreakable love?