Cheney doesn't think we should launch a pre-emptive strike against the NK launch site

[VTBob]

"...obviously, if you are going to launch strikes at another nation, you better be prepared to not fire just one shot."

- VP Dick Cheney

SOURCE: CNN http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/06/22/nkorea.missile/index.html


So, instead you should go in with a poorly planned (or justified, for that matter) invasion with no exit strategy, thats better? :D

[PennSkinsFan]

but, Iraq was a bigger threat than N. Korea. I don't get the logic

[Axegrinder]

but, Iraq was a bigger threat than N. Korea. I don't get the logic
At least N.Korea is contained.Too bad we couldn't say the same for Sadam's Iraq.

[Keino]

Im not sure I could add to the beautiful use of sarcasm contained in this thread.

Well done!!!

[akhhorus]

At least N.Korea is contained.Too bad we couldn't say the same for Sadam's Iraq.

I would actually argue the opposite. Iraq was more contained under Saddam than North Korea was and is.

[Spence]

I thought Axe was being sarcastic there. Maybe he wasn't.

[Keino]

Im fairly certain that Axe was using sarcasm.

[bgforever]

Hm. The stratgy is let it get in an open area, away from the Maritime and in our "Territory" and shoot the duck over open waters, away from any population or land. It is more likely the Navy's standby position is more than ready, as well the Air Force.

[VTBob]

At least N.Korea is contained.Too bad we couldn't say the same for Sadam's Iraq.

Our missile interceptors can take out those NK tests 1/2 the time with ease, but those danged Iraqi mobile weapons labs could still be ANYWHERE :eek:

[Axegrinder]

I thought Axe was being sarcastic there. Maybe he wasn't.
Of course I was!:)