PDA

View Full Version : New Trevor Walters Column - August 10, 2006


Skins.Fan
08-10-2006, 08:08 AM
2006 Redskins Training Camp Myths
By: Trevor Walters
August 10, 2006

The torturous hiatus from football that each calendar year forces upon has faded away, and it’s nearly football time again for all of Redskins Nation. With training camp now in full swing, there are more fans in Redskins jerseys walking around Washington-area towns and neighborhood than there are Bengals in the Hamilton County Jail. For those teams not coached by Mike Nolan, training camp is a time for optimism and hope for the season ahead. But it is also a time where the sanguine atmosphere of a new season can lead one to believe the hype, no matter how unfounded.

Part of it is human nature, really. All of us like to hear nice things said about our teams, and we all have a gullible streak when it comes to compliments. But if one could truly separate himself from the euphoria that is football season, it would become apparent that not all that glitters in August is truly gold in November. It is for this reason that I have taken it upon myself to iron out a few of the most common misconceptions surrounding the 2006-07 Washington Redskins.

Myth #1: Mark Brunell is the most important player on the Redskins Offense.

I’ll admit that this seems quite true on the surface, but that is mainly because the quarterback is a critical part of every NFL team, and in that respect Redskins are certainly no different. There is also valid concern that the backup, whether it is the inexperienced Jason Campbell or the unknown in Todd Collins, will be a significant drop-off from a healthy Brunell. But the most important players on the Redskins offense are Santana Moss and Clinton Portis, not Brunell.

Without Moss, the Redskins passing attack would suffer, thus increasing the load on Brunell. Even taking into account the impact that newcomers Brandon Lloyd and Antwaan Randle El will have, and the receiving threat Chris Cooley has become, Santana Moss is the man that assures that none of those three will be the primary focus of opposing defenses. Facing double and sometimes triple-teams, Moss nearly made legitimate threats out of the likes of Jimmy Ferris and Taylor Jacobs, so imagine what he’ll do when Lloyd or the versatile Randle El lines up opposite him.

Take Clinton Portis away from the offense, and the attack becomes rather one-dimensional, which also places increased stress on Mark Brunell’s already taxing task. All of the sudden, that extra defender drops back, or blitzes in a creative manner, and the passing attack takes a hit. Teams have to plan for Portis, and that only opens things up for the rest of the offense.

Myth #2: Ladell Betts should be counted on to contribute more to the offense.

Everyone raised an eyebrow when offensive guru Al Saunders commented on what he considered to be the surprising talent the Redskins second-stringer displayed. Noting that he knew Betts was good, but he didn’t know how good until he saw him in person, is not the glowing praise it might appear to be. To be pleasantly surprised by someone in anything, one must first have a fairly low expectation of that person. Since Saunders knows football like Ray Lewis knows murder, his presumed limited expectation of Betts’ talent is justified, however the thought that Betts is an underutilized force is overblown.

Everyone who has so much as had a hot dog at FedEx Field knows that Betts, barring injury, has a better chance of starting at off guard for the Mystics than he does of starting at halfback for the Redskins, if for no other reason that the fact that he plays behind Portis. Spelling him for a play, or even the occasional series, is about as far as Betts can safely reach without exceeding his grasp.

It isn’t a tremendous feat for a professional football player to look good in summer workouts. Recall that around this same time in 2005, there were several references made by Joe Gibbs and others referring to the improvement that Taylor Jacobs had made, as well as the mysterious “flash” that was running around Redskins Park as if he were in the ending a prototypical British comedy sketch. Both Jacobs, and the “flash” – which was most likely a reference to Willie Mays Hays in pads, Antonio Brown – proved themselves to be June phenomena, and his history says Betts, known for untimely injuries and not answering the bell, will play out to be the same.

Myth #3: There aren’t enough footballs to satisfy the Redskins new offensive threats.

This is a popular hook upon which the naysayers of the world can hang their hats. It basically refers to the now abundant talent on the offensive side of the ball for the Redskins, and how there won’t be enough touches to go around to keep everyone happy. What this doesn’t take into account is that the two new receivers, Brandon Lloyd and Antwaan Randle El, have never registered more than 50 catches in a season. While that fact belies their explosive potential, it also demonstrates that neither is accustomed to being the primary target, thus neither should be expected to suddenly demand to become the first option.

This also illustrates the irony surrounding the acquisition of Randle El. Many pointed out how princely a sum Washington paid to land a receiver with only seven career receiving touchdowns. ‘He only had 35 catches last season’, was the cry from the mountaintops, yet those same voices now seem to think that Randle El is going to demand the ball at every opportunity. Throwing logic to the wind is the only way that both sides of this ill-conceived criticism can exist.

Myth #4: The Redskins will miss LaVar Arrington in 2006.

What other chronically (for the last two seasons) injured player, who happens to be as ill-suited for the scheme as Bill Parcells is for a leotard, is coming off of a season in which he found himself benched because he couldn’t be trusted, and yet is still seen as a loss to his original team? The answer, of course, is no one, because no team would miss a player with those credentials. The Redskins aren’t planning to make any exceptions for the recently departed LaMartyr Arrington, who saw fit to broadcast his “plight” to anyone who would listen.

Not only will his production not be missed, but the constant distractions he provided will also give way to a blessed peace around Redskins Park. Even now, in the media capital of the world, Arrington loves to lament on his days in D.C., never, however, mentioning the irony that he’s spent his summer learning a new defense, which was one of his primary complaints while in Washington, referring to the various coordinators he played under. So, LaMartyr, it will be nice to see you overrunning plays for General Tom Coughlin this season and no longer in the Burgundy and Gold.

Myth #5: Marvin Lewis is running a high-character program in Cincinnati.

All right, this has nothing to do with the Redskins, but nearly every Bengal this side of Ickey Woods has taken up residence in the local jail at some point during Lewis’ tenure, yet the media still strokes the Marvin Lewis image of high-character players as if Lewis were the conductor of the church choir. Listen, any time you gather a few dozen men between the ages of 22-30, there are going to be run-ins with the law. But the Bengal ratio makes the Baltimore Ravens look deserving of halos.

As the season approaches, the final roster will become more apparent, and months worth of optimism will come to fruition. News comes out left and right, but to keep your sanity, try to keep an objective mind, or, just keep checking in for your Redskins football fix. Hail to the Redskins!




Questions and comments should be sent to skins.fan@comcast.net

BigPlayJay
08-10-2006, 08:29 AM
Some good points. He really nailed Lavar! I totally agree that Betts is sooo overblown. He's a good # 2 back but lacks the durability to be much more.

GolfFreak
08-10-2006, 08:44 AM
Nice article. I liked the shots at Mike Nolan and the Bengals at the beginning.

RichardBradley
08-10-2006, 08:44 AM
Lavar who?

C-7
08-10-2006, 08:57 AM
These articles are always an interesting read. Thanks.

redskinz#1fan
08-10-2006, 09:01 AM
Lavar who?


You know the one.......the guy that is is Giants camp right now with a knee problem......the same knee problem that he had with us......the guy that has taken more shots at us since leaving then Maurice Clarett could have taken with his entire Rambo starter kit.....you must know the guy?......right :rolleyes:

bgforever
08-10-2006, 12:01 PM
Thanks for the update! I like your points and a different look at a couple of things.

James F. Quinn
08-10-2006, 12:27 PM
"...Brandon Lloyd ... neither is accustomed to being the primary target, thus neither should be expected to suddenly demand to become the first option."

I believe that Lloyd was the #1 WR at SF. The fact that the woeful QBs couldn't get him the ball all that much isn't relevant; he expected it, right?

skins74
08-10-2006, 12:32 PM
Nice article. I liked the shots at Mike Nolan and the Bengals at the beginning.


Yeah....me to, especially Mike Nolan's....lol

colkurtz
08-10-2006, 12:45 PM
LaVar's injury problems have been transferred to the Giants. I'm so glad they gave him that $25 mill signing bonus!

He will not be missed at all as this defense improves from #9 last season into the top 5.

BurgundyNGold
08-10-2006, 01:49 PM
Man, I really enjoy reading your articles, Trevor. Just top notch stuff every time. Thanks!

superskin
08-10-2006, 03:35 PM
Trevor is always on point. The only thing I tend to disagree with a bit is the Ladell Betts myth.

I dont think that anyone thought that Saunder's comments about Betts meant that Ladell would infringe on Clinton's playing time. The point was that Betts and Portis should be in the backfield at THE SAME TIME, which creates havoc for any defense. Will Betts run, or will Portis? Will Betts shift out of the backfield and line up as a wideout, while Portis remains in the backfield? Those are the matchup problems that occur when you have someone with great hands AND running ability like Betts.

I definitely think that Saunders comments were purposeful, and that we will see Betts in the backfield with Portis several times this year.

DCassain21
08-10-2006, 05:58 PM
LaVar's injury problems have been transferred to the Giants. I'm so glad they gave him that $25 mill signing bonus!

He will not be missed at all as this defense improves from #9 last season into the top 5.
it will be truely great when he misses 10 games every year due to that knee of his

DCassain21
08-10-2006, 06:00 PM
Trevor is always on point. The only thing I tend to disagree with a bit is the Ladell Betts myth.

I dont think that anyone thought that Saunder's comments about Betts meant that Ladell would infringe on Clinton's playing time. The point was that Betts and Portis should be in the backfield at THE SAME TIME, which creates havoc for any defense. Will Betts run, or will Portis? Will Betts shift out of the backfield and line up as a wideout, while Portis remains in the backfield? Those are the matchup problems that occur when you have someone with great hands AND running ability like Betts.

I definitely think that Saunders comments were purposeful, and that we will see Betts in the backfield with Portis several times this year.
i think betts is one of the best #2 men in the league.... i think he's been hurt by injuries way to much though

The Iceman
08-10-2006, 06:12 PM
Trevor is always on point. The only thing I tend to disagree with a bit is the Ladell Betts myth.

I dont think that anyone thought that Saunder's comments about Betts meant that Ladell would infringe on Clinton's playing time. The point was that Betts and Portis should be in the backfield at THE SAME TIME, which creates havoc for any defense. Will Betts run, or will Portis? Will Betts shift out of the backfield and line up as a wideout, while Portis remains in the backfield? Those are the matchup problems that occur when you have someone with great hands AND running ability like Betts.

I definitely think that Saunders comments were purposeful, and that we will see Betts in the backfield with Portis several times this year.
I could not agree with you more superskin. This is right on point IMO. I think Betts is an underrated RB, and if we all remember he was a 2nd round draft pick. It's not like he's one of these undrafted guys that shines in TC and makes the team. I think if he stays healthy, he could be a guy that lets Portis come out of the game for a while in the 2nd half to stay fresh, and keep his shoulders from wearing down as the season drags on.

bantu
08-10-2006, 06:20 PM
Uhhhh, I hate to break to ya'll..... Betts could start at tailback for a lot of teams in this league. His importance is not overblown in my book. I remember some game last year where he was hurt and our run game suffered cuz our backups were not good enough. Remember training camp last year when he was hurt and there was all this question as to who will back up Portis from the media? The whole time Gibbs & Co. downplayed the battle for 2nd string and said wait for Betts to come back, and they were right. He most certainly was the 2nd best RB we had.

While I agree, Brunell is not the most important player, his health status is still: 2006 Redskins-Question #1. IF Portis was to go down, god forbid, there is much greater talent behind him than Brunell. And lets keep it real, the QB position is more important than RB. Thats a fact.

Canfan
08-10-2006, 08:31 PM
Uhhhh, I hate to break to ya'll..... Betts could start at tailback for a lot of teams in this league. His importance is not overblown in my book. I remember some game last year where he was hurt and our run game suffered cuz our backups were not good enough. Remember training camp last year when he was hurt and there was all this question as to who will back up Portis from the media? The whole time Gibbs & Co. downplayed the battle for 2nd string and said wait for Betts to come back, and they were right. He most certainly was the 2nd best RB we had.

While I agree, Brunell is not the most important player, his health status is still: 2006 Redskins-Question #1. IF Portis was to go down, god forbid, there is much greater talent behind him than Brunell. And lets keep it real, the QB position is more important than RB. Thats a fact.

Actually, I think that Portis is the most important person in the offense for this reason:

If Brunell goes down, a 2nd string QB (hopefully Campbell) will be able to get by with a healthy Portis to take alot of pressure off of him by picking up first downs on the ground, whereas, if we lose Portis to injury, Brunell will be under alot of pressure to gain first downs through the air. I think it is much easier to depend on our running game if we must become more one dimensional due to injury, thereby making Portis, not Brunell more valuable.

Keino
08-10-2006, 08:47 PM
Trevor that was good stuff and I tend to agree with just about every word you write, though I do think you understate the importance of the intangibles that Brunell brings to the table. Sure CP is by far the most important player in the offense but losing Brunell this year would be devasting in my mind. I think it's his leadership thats going to be a difference maker in our push to contending for the the goods.

whistleandthumb
08-10-2006, 08:51 PM
Trevor is always on point. The only thing I tend to disagree with a bit is the Ladell Betts myth.

I dont think that anyone thought that Saunder's comments about Betts meant that Ladell would infringe on Clinton's playing time. The point was that Betts and Portis should be in the backfield at THE SAME TIME, which creates havoc for any defense. Will Betts run, or will Portis? Will Betts shift out of the backfield and line up as a wideout, while Portis remains in the backfield? Those are the matchup problems that occur when you have someone with great hands AND running ability like Betts.

I definitely think that Saunders comments were purposeful, and that we will see Betts in the backfield with Portis several times this year.
SS nailed it. Trevor is precisely right on every Myth, except for Betts. Betts has shown flashes of brilliance throughout his tenure with the Redskins, but he's never been the #1 guy, and I don't think that's what Saunders was referencing when talking about him.

SS has it perfect: Betts and CP together makes for a lethal combination. THAT'S where Ladell can be best used.

BurgundyNGold
08-10-2006, 09:58 PM
SS nailed it. Trevor is precisely right on every Myth, except for Betts. Betts has shown flashes of brilliance throughout his tenure with the Redskins, but he's never been the #1 guy, and I don't think that's what Saunders was referencing when talking about him.

SS has it perfect: Betts and CP together makes for a lethal combination. THAT'S where Ladell can be best used.
Yep, but Ladell has an ego so he'll walk and take the FA $$$ after this season.

RedskinsVision
08-10-2006, 10:22 PM
Yep, but Ladell has an ego so he'll walk and take the FA $$$ after this season.

Some team will give him a shot at starting next year so it's a situation where we want him to succeed in the backup role for CP but at this rate he's playing for next year.

BurgundyNGold
08-10-2006, 10:29 PM
Some team will give him a shot at starting next year so it's a situation where we want him to succeed in the backup role for CP but at this rate he's playing for next year.
Someone will give him the $$$ and we're not positioned to give Ladell starter cash. Sort of like Lamont Jordan a few years back, although I think LJ was a better prospect as a starter.

whistleandthumb
08-11-2006, 01:46 AM
Yep, but Ladell has an ego so he'll walk and take the FA $$$ after this season.
Well, that Super Bowl ring on his finger will certainly help his cause. :)

shally
08-11-2006, 01:51 AM
Someone will give him the $$$ and we're not positioned to give Ladell starter cash. Sort of like Lamont Jordan a few years back, although I think LJ was a better prospect as a starter.

exactly.. he sees himself as the second coming of lamont jordan and will look for the same type of contract.. maybe someone will give it to him inwhich case the skins will not match it and he will be gone..
i think the difference is that lamont is not only a better back, but also more durable than betts.. that is what a team will have to consider if they roll the dice with betts... can he be counted on to make it through an entire season as a starter ? i personally would bet against it