PDA

View Full Version : Positional Breakdowns for each team...

redskinz#1fan
08-23-2006, 08:32 AM
I didn't see this posted anywhere (I checked 4 pages worth of threads), but if it is then I'm truly sorry. These were some very interesting rankings....:rolleyes:


Here (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5857526?FSO1&ATT=HCP?GT1=8485) is the link to the main article, but I have each position listed below with links.


Quarterbacks (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5764156)

RunningBacks (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5776936)

WideReceivers (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5785564)

Offensive Line (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5794000)

Defensive Line (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5819844)

Linebackers (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5834838)

Defensive Backs (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5857124)

Special Teams (http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5862990)

I personally don't feel like we get much love in most of these rankings (just a few). They use some very stupid reasons to rank some teams very high. What do ya'll think?
DUCKIN_TACKLERS
08-23-2006, 10:00 AM
thanks for putting all those in one thread. some of them had been posted individually but it was nice to see them all at once.
openallnight
08-23-2006, 10:22 AM
Wow, they had us at 3 prior to the Duckett deal. Guess, they'll bump us up to 1 now!
RichardBradley
08-23-2006, 04:03 PM
How we cant be highr in wr is only because we have a gimp playing qb
IowaSkinsFan
08-23-2006, 07:55 PM
How we cant be highr in wr is only because we have a gimp playing qb

Everyone remembers the Brunell who finished the season rather than the one who started the season....he (Brunell) will have to prove everyone wrong again.
Skins57
08-23-2006, 09:15 PM
Everyone remembers the Brunell who finished the season rather than the one who started the season....he (Brunell) will have to prove everyone wrong again.

Key word again, and atleast we have a back up that has a chance.. Brunell could win the super bowl and people would give him no credit..shameful.

Dallas at number 1 at WO WTF... a cnacer(TO), a decent WR(Glenn) a very good TE and nothing else... oh well hope TO hammy heals so when we crush Dallas they have no excuse
SimplyZ
08-24-2006, 08:49 PM
those rating seem pretty bad IMO...just from looking at the top 5's i dont liek them
bgforever
08-24-2006, 09:24 PM
Thanks. Note from BGF.

Mark Brunell's dropoff wasn't attributed to him, as much as it was attributed one of the OLDEST OG to start a game for such a stretch, in NFL history, filling for the actual starter Randy Thomas, a Pro Bowl caliber OG!. Add to this, Patten WASN'T available, as the #2 to take the heat off of Moss, who still came through. Add to this, a brief spell of Portis' abscence and BIG dropoff in blocking from him to Betts, as well the threat Portis presents to give MB time with play action. The games also determined WHAT MB was to do, but he also has 21 other men during the course of a game, on the field.

I differ on this assessment of him, but nevertheless, welcome the underdog status anyway.

Maybe a bit more consideration, next time in understanding what makes a game.
FanFromArizona
08-25-2006, 09:19 PM
Only problem I have is that most of these articles are OVER 30 DAYS old[with the exception of the QB article]

Perhaps an updated version? Things like Chiefs line being dominant behind Roaf who just retired?