PDA

View Full Version : What Time Is It? Poll Time, WOOO!!!

rskinsfan10
08-30-2003, 07:50 PM
Check it out at www.hailredskins.com

Let me remeind you as I always do. It is your obligation to vote. If not, you hR membership will be revoked and you will shipped FedEx to Antarctica wher you will have plenty of free time to think about why you didn't handle your responsibilities. Remember, the choice is yours.

As always, discuss it here...
PennSkinsFan
08-30-2003, 08:00 PM
If we need to go to a 3rd QB, then our OLine sucks and were screwed.
rskinsfan10
08-30-2003, 08:09 PM
Originally posted by PennSkinsFan
If we need to go to a 3rd QB, then our OLine sucks and were screwed.

Agree with the screwed part, but I can't say that would be an accurate analysis of the o-line nessecarily. Vick was hurt being Vick and Pennington's injury IMO was of the freaky nature with him just landing awkwardly.
NCskinsfanatic
08-30-2003, 08:39 PM
If any thing i would think the preseason injuries to Pennington and Vick as well as Johnson's hisory would support the fact we need 3 qb's.
bfauble83
08-30-2003, 10:36 PM
The 3rd QB is hardly used, plus since Barker holds for Hall its not like Johnson is going to be in the line of fire every week...maybe this will keep SS from pulling Ramsey if he struggles (maybe he didn't to protect the team from himself)
rskinsfan10
08-30-2003, 10:41 PM
Originally posted by bfauble83
The 3rd QB is hardly used, plus since Barker holds for Hall its not like Johnson is going to be in the line of fire every week...maybe this will keep SS from pulling Ramsey if he struggles (maybe he didn't to protect the team from himself)

Good point about Johnson not being the holder.

I have to believe that with the scenario that was reported with Snyder holding the tie-breaking vote between the coaches and the personell dept. when they couldn't agree, Spurrier was all for keeping Wuerffel.
Rat_Boy
08-31-2003, 01:57 AM
This is one of those moves where hindsight is going to win out easily.

If Ram and Rob get hurt in the same game, then the move will be deemed moronic by the media.

If only one of them is ever hurt at any one given time, then the move will be considered a great idea by the media for a team looking to keep an extra player.

On a side note, and sort of related, the Falcons are SORT OF doing the same thing. What I mean is, they have 3 QB's, but one of them is VICK who is out for 6 weeks. So in their 1st 6 games, they are in the same boat as we are with only 2 QB's on the roster.
bfauble83
08-31-2003, 10:07 AM
Too bad we don't still have B. Mitch...is anyone else on the roster a former collge or high school QB?
CarMike
08-31-2003, 10:19 AM
As been reported earlier, Rod Gardner was a high school QB. But not a college QB of course...

I too voted that if we lose two QBs that we're screwed. I agree with Kenny though. Just because two QBs get hurt, it doesn't mean that it will be our OL sucks. They can get hurt in a # of ways....
Green-Is-Good
09-01-2003, 08:33 PM
I didn't vote. When will the FedEx van come by my house?
AGibbsGirl
09-01-2003, 08:49 PM
Didn't the Washington Post article say that they would consider using Coles or Gardner as emergency QB's if needed? That would be interesting...
rskinsfan10
09-01-2003, 11:32 PM
Originally posted by Green Is Good
I didn't vote. When will the FedEx van come by my house?

I'll be driving it personally. It'll be a surprise as to when it shows up.
Patrick
09-02-2003, 07:01 AM
They are just playing the odds - of all the games played (256 regular season) last year what was the % of games where the #3 QB HAD to be used? My guess is < 2%. - I take them odds any day!!!!