PDA

View Full Version : Lack of draft picks are killing us.


bigcmr
04-28-2007, 11:31 PM
It was a long day watching the whole draft. I will admit I was on the drafting a D-Lineman badwagon. The Landery pick was by far the best talent avalible but left a lot of us scratching our heads about what our team needs our. Well lets not kid ourselfs. If we never would of squandered our 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round picks away in trades. We could of drafted Landery and taken care of the D-line in 2nd and 3rd. And all been happy. Well I just hope this can be a lesson learned by the FO. To stop burning draft picks before we relize we need them. Good thing today is we did not start trading away picks for next year. So lets all be possitive and hope we can find some late round gems in day 2 of the draft.

Skinreds
04-28-2007, 11:34 PM
It was a long day watching the whole draft. I will admit I was on the drafting a D-Lineman badwagon. The Landery pick was by far the best talent avalible but left a lot of us scratching our heads about what our team needs our. Well lets not kid ourselfs. If we never would of squandered our 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round picks away in trades. We could of drafted Landery and taken care of the D-line in 2nd and 3rd. And all been happy. Well I just hope this can be a lesson learned by the FO. To stop burning draft picks before we relize we need them. Good thing today is we did not start trading away picks for next year. So lets all be possitive and hope we can find some late round gems in day 2 of the draft.

I know, i noticed how man DTs and DEs slipped into 2nd and 3rd rounds. if only we had one pick in those rounds..... i think Quinton Pittcock went in the 3rd round to Indy, we could have gotten him if anything.

whitskins
04-28-2007, 11:34 PM
Yes, this philosophy has hurt us for years and killed us today. It was a really bitter pill to swallow and I hope that Gibbs and Snyder feel the same way.

I have to believe that they are adjusting their philosophy because they resisted the urge to trade future picks to get back into the first when there were still players who could help us. I think they decided to just bite the bullet and come in next year with a full slate. I still think we had a good offseason even with only one first day pick though. But we do have several holes left unfilled because of some poor deals in the past.

bigcmr
04-28-2007, 11:51 PM
As of right now In next years draft we are only missing a 4th rounder. So hopefully the FO does not touch any of next years draft picks.

BurgundyNGold
04-28-2007, 11:59 PM
As of right now In next years draft we are only missing a 4th rounder. So hopefully the FO does not touch any of next years draft picks.
Duckett. :doh:

Redskinfan28
04-29-2007, 07:08 AM
the TJ Duckett trade was one of he worst in modern era.

SpicyMcHaggis
04-29-2007, 07:56 AM
the TJ Duckett trade was one of he worst in modern era.
It's easier if you pretend it never happened..it really is..trust me...

Skinz4lyfe
04-29-2007, 07:59 AM
It's easier if you pretend it never happened..it really is..trust me...

TJ Duckett? What happened? You mean he doesn't play for the Falcons anymore? :)

Hr fan
04-29-2007, 08:31 AM
Yes, this philosophy has hurt us for years and killed us today. It was a really bitter pill to swallow and I hope that Gibbs and Snyder feel the same way.

I have to believe that they are adjusting their philosophy because they resisted the urge to trade future picks to get back into the first when there were still players who could help us. I think they decided to just bite the bullet and come in next year with a full slate. I still think we had a good offseason even with only one first day pick though. But we do have several holes left unfilled because of some poor deals in the past.

The FO is concentrating on obtaining veterans, using trade bait like Shawn Springs and future picks, to fill the holes on the D line. Sigh.

Hr fan
04-29-2007, 08:34 AM
As of right now In next years draft we are only missing a 4th rounder. So hopefully the FO does not touch any of next years draft picks.

If I remember correctly Gibbs said at a news conference that the Duckett disaster had been concluded by the 3rd pick alone. Made sense - the 5th pick in round 3 cerftainly qualifies as a "high thrid round pick" in value. Please, someone, correct me if I am wrong.

akhhorus
04-29-2007, 09:04 AM
the TJ Duckett trade was one of he worst in modern era.

it was a bad trade, but jesus christ: it was worst than two top 15 picks for Sean Gilbert? Or 2 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd(and Eric Metcalf) for Ryan Leaf? Or even in the same ball park as Philip Rivers, Merriman and Nate Kaeding for Eli Manning? Get a fricking grip.

redskin_rich
04-29-2007, 09:12 AM
If I remember correctly Gibbs said at a news conference that the Duckett disaster had been concluded by the 3rd pick alone. Made sense - the 5th pick in round 3 cerftainly qualifies as a "high thrid round pick" in value. Please, someone, correct me if I am wrong.
Gibbs said we were giving this year's 3rd and next year's 4th, in his season ending press conference.

I really wish we could have just swapped 1st rounders to complete the value of the trade.

shally
04-29-2007, 10:20 AM
Duckett. :doh:

i thought duckett was THIS year ?? >>>d'oh.. plus a 4th from next to sweeten it for denver...

shally
04-29-2007, 10:21 AM
The FO is concentrating on obtaining veterans, using trade bait like Shawn Springs and future picks, to fill the holes on the D line. Sigh.

they better not dump springs or landry better have a set of wings under his jersey

NCskinsfanatic
04-29-2007, 10:32 AM
I don't think springs is going anywhere...atleast not with day one draft complete, the only scenario I could see is a trade for a starting DE after the draft.

shally
04-29-2007, 10:34 AM
I don't think springs is going anywhere...atleast not with day one draft complete, the only scenario I could see is a trade for a starting DE after the draft.

justin smith ?? if cincy cannot get him signed long term...

still, not much out there right now

urobm
04-29-2007, 10:35 AM
It is frustrating to see all these value picks slide down the draft and we can do anything but wait until the 5th round. Well this is a lesson well learned. I just hope we end up getting a DLineman late that can atleast contribute a little bit. I know thats wishful thinking, but are there really anymore options at this point.

shally
04-29-2007, 10:44 AM
It is frustrating to see all these value picks slide down the draft and we can do anything but wait until the 5th round. Well this is a lesson well learned. I just hope we end up getting a DLineman late that can atleast contribute a little bit. I know thats wishful thinking, but are there really anymore options at this point.

there will be some post june 1 after teams assess their draft and go younger and cheaper--- something we never worry about

urobm
04-29-2007, 10:52 AM
there will be some post june 1 after teams assess their draft and go younger and cheaper--- something we never worry about


Yeah I know, I just dont like depending on that because, you never know for sure who is going to be there. At this point I think thats the only option though, unless there a truly is a gem out there in the 5 - 7 round.

shally
04-29-2007, 11:03 AM
Yeah I know, I just dont like depending on that because, you never know for sure who is going to be there. At this point I think thats the only option though, unless there a truly is a gem out there in the 5 - 7 round.

even a "gem" will be productive only the last 1/3 of the season.. it will take at least that long to earn GW's trust and get playing time

urobm
04-29-2007, 11:05 AM
even a "gem" will be productive only the last 1/3 of the season.. it will take at least that long to earn GW's trust and get playing time


So while on the topic of playing time, how long before Landry is in the starting lineup.

akhhorus
04-29-2007, 11:06 AM
even a "gem" will be productive only the last 1/3 of the season.. it will take at least that long to earn GW's trust and get playing time

Except that Golston and Montgomery were playing significant time from Day 1. This concept that Williams doesn't play rookies is a myth.

SpicyMcHaggis
04-29-2007, 11:07 AM
Except that Golston and Montgomery were playing significant time from Day 1. This concept that Williams doesn't play rookies is a myth.
Yeah. It was created by Rocky. He is the only rookie that didn't get significant playing time early on in the season.

akhhorus
04-29-2007, 11:08 AM
Yeah. It was created by Rocky. He is the only rookie that didn't get significant playing time early on in the season.

But he did. He played significant time in the Indy game, and looked terrible.

urobm
04-29-2007, 11:09 AM
justin smith ?? if cincy cannot get him signed long term...

still, not much out there right now


Please dont get me excited like that!! Justin Smith, would't that be something!!

SpicyMcHaggis
04-29-2007, 11:09 AM
But he did. He played significant time in the Indy game, and looked terrible.
I meant real early, like first 3-4 games.

shally
04-29-2007, 11:46 AM
So while on the topic of playing time, how long before Landry is in the starting lineup.

special teams right away..

game 4 as a starter... actually a lot depends upon the health of PP

SpicyMcHaggis
04-29-2007, 11:48 AM
special teams right away..

game 4 as a starter... actually a lot depends upon the health of PP
I think he starts the opener.

shally
04-29-2007, 11:49 AM
Except that Golston and Montgomery were playing significant time from Day 1. This concept that Williams doesn't play rookies is a myth.

i think you are exactly right about golston.. but i do not even think that montgomery was activated for many games, much less got onto the field

they soured on him pretty quickly because of his poor practice performance

shally
04-29-2007, 11:50 AM
I think he starts the opener.

PP or landry ?

landry will not start until game 4.. put some asti on that one..

akhhorus
04-29-2007, 11:51 AM
i think you are exactly right about golston.. but i do not even think that montgomery was activated for many games, much less got onto the field

they soured on him pretty quickly because of his poor practice performance

He played in 9 games, and played significant time by week 3. He didn't play at all in the 2nd half of the season basically.

SpicyMcHaggis
04-29-2007, 11:51 AM
i think you are exactly right about golston.. but i do not even think that montgomery was activated for many games, much less got onto the field

they soured on him pretty quickly because of his poor practice performance
He was active for 5 games and recorded at least a tackel in 4. But you're right, they played him early on, and then nothing except the Falcons game.

shally
04-29-2007, 12:54 PM
He played in 9 games, and played significant time by week 3. He didn't play at all in the 2nd half of the season basically.

okay.. that is what i recall.. he was said to be a poor practice player and didnt get activated, as you say, for nearly the second half of the year.

hopefully he has had a solid off season

shally
04-29-2007, 12:55 PM
He was active for 5 games and recorded at least a tackel in 4. But you're right, they played him early on, and then nothing except the Falcons game.

so, either he wore down due to poor conditioning (which i think) or his effort and desire waned as he got a taste of the pro game.

he needs a solid off season to contribute this season

Hr fan
04-30-2007, 07:44 AM
As of right now In next years draft we are only missing a 4th rounder. So hopefully the FO does not touch any of next years draft picks.

Someone please check up on this. As originally announced the trade was "the equivalent of a high 3rd round draft choice", or a swap of 1st rounders (depending on relative point value), or a 3rd & 2008 4th if the 3rd was not high enough. 80% of 3rd round picks occured after our 3rd. I remember JG at a news conference two months ago saying the trade had been settle for our 3rd, period, but memory is a frail thing. If someone knows what the facts are please answer this post. Thanks.