IowaSkinsFan
09-02-2003, 04:40 AM
Has anyone heard any branch of the media talk about the Chargers and Bills decisions to keep only 2 QB's on the 53 man roster? A third team, the Falcons, will only have 2 available for the next 6 weeks or however long Vick is out, as they decided against signing someone for that period of time.
Anyway, my point is that I think most of us were in shock when both Hamdan and Wuerffel were cut, not nearly as much as the release of Watson, but still shocked nonetheless. I don't think any of us envisioned only 2 QB's on opening day roster.
I think the media was primed to pounce on this until the Chargers and Bills announced there moves as well. I would view it as hypocrisy for the media to only talk about the Redskins decision to do this when 2 other teams are also doing it and I was wondering if anyone had heard or read the critics tearing us down over this?
Anyway, my point is that I think most of us were in shock when both Hamdan and Wuerffel were cut, not nearly as much as the release of Watson, but still shocked nonetheless. I don't think any of us envisioned only 2 QB's on opening day roster.
I think the media was primed to pounce on this until the Chargers and Bills announced there moves as well. I would view it as hypocrisy for the media to only talk about the Redskins decision to do this when 2 other teams are also doing it and I was wondering if anyone had heard or read the critics tearing us down over this?