PDA

View Full Version : Akh's Thoughts: Week 1


akhhorus
09-09-2007, 09:57 PM
What we learned from the Skins’ OT win over the Dolphins:

1-So….what happened to this vaunted Cover-1 Defense Williams said was going to be played to maximize LaRon Landry. We played it for 1 drive(and Landry did attack), but then when right back to the drop Cover-2s and 3s(and putting Landry at FS also).

2(or 1a)-The justification for getting LaRon Landry instead of a Jamaal Williams or Amobi Okoye was that Landry would be used as an attacker/blitzer. I counted 2-3 plays where this actually did happen.

3-Before the season, I said that Anthony Montgomery would be the key to the Dline. Today, he showed it. I grant that the Dolphins have a meh Oline, but Montgomery was a force against the run. While I’m on the subject…

4-The run defense was extremely solid today. Griffin wasn’t overused, Golston wasn’t asked to do too much, Montgomery was challenged to attack and hold the point and the Ends covered the outside gaps very well. Rocky still had some over-pursuit issues, but all 3 lbs played the run well.

5-However, the pass rush was as lively as Strom Thurmond is now. Marcus Washington at DE was a bad idea all day, Carter & Rocky had nice sacks, but the Skins failed to get consistent pressure all day(which you should do with an older QB like Green).

6-I know he’s a fan favorite, but Fred Smoot…you suck and opposing teams know it. The Dolphins targeted him as their safety blanket-especially on 3rd downs. This is not a good sign and Springs and Rogers(and I thought Carlos played a nice game) should be the starter with Macklin/Smoot fighting for the NB spot). With the lack of consistent pressure, the Cbs have to play well—and consistently so—to conceal this problem until it’s fixed.

6a-Also: wtf was with the Dolphins using the PA pass to the RB all day and the Skins’ complete inability to do ANYTHING about it? They must have run that play 10-12 with success!

Ok, enough about the Defense.

7-Clinton Portis-after shaking off some early rust-looked extremely good today. 97 yards and averaged 5.8 yards per carry. Splitting time with Betts will be the best thing that happened to him since he won’t be worn down later in games. Betts was reliable and effective, but I think that there’s some sort of mystical barrier, which destroys his knees at 5 yards past the line of scrimmage.

8-Campbell did look shaky at times(I contend that his 2nd INT was the fault of Brandon Lloyd quitting on the play at the 20), but a lot of his problems I believe were the fault of Moss having a case of the drops. There was 2-3 of them on key 3rd downs. Campbell’s worst pass was his first, where he should have floated it over Cooley with the defender cracking down on the inside of Cooley.

9-If this was Jansen’s ride off into the sunset, thanks for 8 years of sweat, blood, leadership and as great a RT as we’ve seen since Ed Simmons left. I don’t think we will have seen the last of Jansen, he’s a natural for ESPN or sports commentary----but I hope it’s not the last we’ve seen of him on the field.

10-Heyer, who I’ve been critical of, played a very good game. RT seems like a good fit for him and he did a good job neutralizing Jason Taylor by not trying to pancake him or stonewall him. He did what you’re supposed to and let Taylor take himself out of plays by letting him go as fast as he wants, and riding him around the back of Campbell. His run blocking there has to improve though, and the Skins mainly ran behind Samuels/Kendall in the later stages of the game

11-Randle El just sunk his claws into the 2nd WR job with an amazing performance. Him and Campbell are truly on the same page, and ARE has the quickness to burn defenses scared of Moss and Cooley. ARE’s hail mary catch would have gone into Redskins’ lore if he was able to squirt it past the goalline.

12-What concerned me most about the offense-besides Moss’ drops(which seemed to improve and cease by the end of the game), was the lack of a plan with the playcalling until the end of the game. Saunders seemed to outthink himself and call play groups that were too complicated.

Tailgate note:
13-I would like to make a motion to hold the tailgates in October to avoid all the heat stroke related issues lol. And as for the rest of the tailgate, I guess you just had to be there….


New Feature: Grading the Skins.

Much like European Soccer which grades the individual players on a 1-10(1-7 in France’s case) scale, I will grade the starters(or primary players in case of injury):

Offense:
X WR Santana Moss: Had some drops, but a couple late catches that were important. 5.5
X WR Antwaan Randle-El: An amazing game to start the season, and has emerges as a new threat for the Skins to team with Cooley/Portis/Moss: 9.5
TE Chris Cooley: Better blocking, but didn’t contribute much in the passing game: 5
LT Chris Samuels: Gave up an early sack to Jason Taylor, but looked very stout and had a great run blocking game 7.5
LG Pete Kendall: Gee, do you think the Jets miss him? Solid across the board all day. 7
OC Casey Rabach: Did a great job calling the blocks with 3 new starters around him(Samuels, Heyer and Kendall): 8
RG Randy Thomas: solid, but unspectacular game. Best today in the run blocking. 6.5
RT Stephon Heyer: Was presented with a major challenge to start his NFL career when Capers put Jason Taylor over him as a welcome present, but did a great job pass blocking. Run blocking at RT needs work though. 7
QB Jason Campbell: Some mistakes and was too reliant on ARE making plays for him. Solid, nothing special today. 6.5
FB Mike Sellers: Nice blocking, but a fumble(that didn’t hurt) and looked sluggish in the receiving game. 6
RB Clinton Portis: Looked faster in straight line speed, and ran hard all day. Can’t argue with 17 carries, 98 yards. 8
RB Ladell Betts: He’s really found his form as a grinding between the tackles RB. I wouldn’t count on him as a full time RB. Too one dimensional. A solid game today. 6.5
K Scott Suisham: Made clutch kicks and solid kickoffs. Can’t ask too much more from him. 7.5
KR Rock Cartwright: 2 solid returns, but nothing special. 6

Defense:
DE Andre Carter: Solid against the run and a sack on Green early. 7.5
DT Anthony Montgomery: Very stout against the run and was a handful all game. 8.5
DT Cornie Griffin: Closed down his rush lanes all day, but provided zero pressure. 7
DE Philip Daniels: Did well against the rush, but was as effective as a corpse on the pass rush and was replaced on 3rd downs for Chris Wilson 5.5
SLB Marcus Washington: Very well against the run, struggled on the pass rush and looked wasted as a DE. 5.5
MLB London Fletcher: Run killer, but struggled in coverage—especially losing the RB in space. 6.5
WLB Rocky McIntosh: Developing nicely. He still struggled with over running plays, but had a nice sack of Green and looked solid in coverage. 7.5
CB Fred Smoot: Horrendous all day, he had a big fat bullseye on him all day. Dropping a game clinching TD in the late 4th quarter might have been unforgivable if Miami won. 3
FS Sean Taylor: Was solid in coverage and helped to take away half the field. The less you hear his name, the better. 7.5
SS LaRon Landry: Wasted in the Cover-2, but had some nice hits, including breaking up a 3rd down pass by nailing a WR in the hip to flip him. 6.5
CB Carlos Rogers: Very solid game, he saved a touchdown early in the game with a great open field tackle of Chambers and until his PI call late, he was very effective all day. 6.5
P Derrick Frost: 48.0 Average and 64 yard punt, with a net on 74 yards with the Phins’ penalty on the punt. 8.5
PR Antwaan Randle El: He was okay as a PR, if Todd Yoder could have held his block, he had a sure 40 yard return(and maybe a TD) in the 3rd. 6

shally
09-09-2007, 10:03 PM
good stuff

we got very little effective pass rush, with or without blitzing.. that will kill us against better teams.

macklin wasnt even active today because williams loves torrence's speed

smoak
09-09-2007, 10:07 PM
I'm with you almost all accounts Akh. Great write. I would like to suggest that Smoot doesn't suck, but rather his cushions do. He had a horrendous game, but hopefully GW gets that cleared up b/c Smoot can play.

Biggie
09-09-2007, 10:08 PM
Great analysis, but I think you're giving a little too much credit to Moss and too little to Cooley. We didn't see Cooley because he was helping Heyer with JT, and Moss definitely was not playing like his usual self.

Skins57
09-09-2007, 10:11 PM
Great write up Akh.

akhhorus
09-09-2007, 10:11 PM
I'm with you almost all accounts Akh. Great write. I would like to suggest that Smoot doesn't suck, but rather his cushions do. He had a horrendous game, but hopefully GW gets that cleared up b/c Smoot can play.

The funniest was at the post game tailgate when Fent and Keino were re-creating Smoot's cushions and Keino kept telling Fent "No, farther back".

SkinsASchamps
09-09-2007, 10:14 PM
Did our punter change his first name? Lol.

I agree with most everything. I would really like to see our D attack more. I would also like to see the offense have a sense of purpose when we are out there.

shally
09-09-2007, 10:14 PM
The funniest was at the post game tailgate when Fent and Keino were re-creating Smoot's cushions and Keino kept telling Fent "No, farther back".

all 3 of of our corners can tackle well.. i didnt see who missed the tackle to set up the fins TD, but the misses were few and far between

Slobberknocker
09-09-2007, 10:14 PM
Only 7.5 for Scott Suisham? I suppose there might be some deduction for a short kickoff or two but I don't think there's a whole lot more you can ask for.

Does Smoot suck? Or did he just suck today? The big question is what was up with Springs. Cover 2s last year were largely dictated by our secondary so it shouldn't be a surprise that we resorted to it. How can we possibly deactivate Macklin? Was that a sign of faith in Torrence? Yikes.

The secondary should get some credit for no long gainers in the passing game. We got abused in short stuff but that's still a relief compared to what we saw last year. Green never seemed to have anybody to throw to down the field. He often had too much time, but he repeatedly checked the ball down.

Tackling was pretty solid and we did a much better job on 3rd down than we did last season.

Bottom line: we found a way to win. Good teams do that, as we ought to know. And bad teams don't. Just ask Buffalo.

400 yards total offense? I want that! Scott Kendall is a keeper.

akhhorus
09-09-2007, 10:22 PM
Did our punter change his first name? Lol.


Dammit, thats like the 3rd time I've screwed up his name. I'm calling him Scott from now on lol.

shally
09-09-2007, 10:25 PM
Dammit, thats like the 3rd time I've screwed up his name. I'm calling him Scott from now on lol.

you cant recognize frosty without his patented rollers...

LATrueRedskin
09-09-2007, 10:41 PM
I gotta say, I was critical of Portis for not playing the preseason, and fearful that he'd be out of shape, but he played a great game today. He started strong and finished strong, with Betts helping in the middle.

And yeah, Smoot does suck. Bang-up job by Williams making him the starter.

Good stuff, Akh.

smoak
09-09-2007, 10:44 PM
Dammit, thats like the 3rd time I've screwed up his name. I'm calling him Scott from now on lol.

He played like a different Frost.

Lavar703
09-09-2007, 10:48 PM
Great write up AKH, and you now coming from me, thats very rare LOL

akhhorus
09-09-2007, 10:52 PM
He played like a different Frost.

H.G.H is my guess(kidding) lol.

jaylen
09-09-2007, 11:05 PM
I too was disappointed in how GW used Landry, he seemed to chicken out once the Fins started passing it underneath.

Smoot is done, has lost his smooth hip turn, was able to break on 1 ball and that was because of a late throw by trent green. Absolutely no reason at all to have had Springs playing the nickle corner. He should have been locked on Chanbers. He would have surely limited some of the dink and dunk they were doing.

Offensively we just weren't that sharp, JC missed some throws he normally makes, and Moss I think because he had the safety overtop was paranoid of taking the big hit. He was surrounded by coverage the whole day.

Its why ARE had a big day.

Portis was tremednous.

shally
09-09-2007, 11:40 PM
I too was disappointed in how GW used Landry, he seemed to chicken out once the Fins started passing it underneath.

Smoot is done, has lost his smooth hip turn, was able to break on 1 ball and that was because of a late throw by trent green. Absolutely no reason at all to have had Springs playing the nickle corner. He should have been locked on Chanbers. He would have surely limited some of the dink and dunk they were doing.

Offensively we just weren't that sharp, JC missed some throws he normally makes, and Moss I think because he had the safety overtop was paranoid of taking the big hit. He was surrounded by coverage the whole day.

Its why ARE had a big day.

Portis was tremednous.

it is a lot to ask of a rookie safety.. even one as promising as landry..

chambers is still a premier receiver

SkinsfaninNJ
09-09-2007, 11:47 PM
Akh, I was thinking of you when Heyer continued to play well. I know you were thinking guard, but as I was watching him I was thinking maybe this kid is meant to be a RT. He played well today.

I could not figure out GW calls. Carter had the early sack and Miami seemed to go to a shorter passing attack, which seemed to dictate that GW was going to stop sending blitzes. With a little creativity and the awful Phins line, I thought we could have caused some more havoc with our D.

jaylen
09-09-2007, 11:51 PM
it is a lot to ask of a rookie safety.. even one as promising as landry..

chambers is still a premier receiver

huh I wasn't suggesting landry lock in on Chambers just mentioned that Landry wasn't used that often near the line in the blitz game. he was playing back most of the game.

I thought Springs should have been locked in on Chambers he's good enough to handle that.

shally
09-09-2007, 11:54 PM
huh I wasn't suggesting landry lock in on Chambers just mentioned that Landry wasn't used that often near the line in the blitz game. he was playing back most of the game.

I thought Springs should have been locked in on Chambers he's good enough to handle that.

in years past that is exactly how springs would have been used..

whitskins
09-09-2007, 11:56 PM
All my worries about CP are gone. As long as his knee stays right then he's still the same player he always was, and he'll be better down the stretch b/c of Betts too. So happy and relieved at his performance.

17 carres, 98 yards, 1 TD, 5.8 ypc against last year's #4 defense... Not bad for the 202nd best player in the league. You are a massive hack, Peter King.

inevitable
09-10-2007, 12:06 AM
17 carres, 98 yards, 1 TD, 5.8 ypc against last year's #4 defense... Not bad for the 202nd best player in the league. You are a massive hack, Peter King.

:signed:

Biggie
09-10-2007, 12:25 AM
You are a massive hack, Peter King.

Seconded and thirded. Can one of the hR peeps who work on Capitol Hill sneak this into a bill?

shally
09-10-2007, 12:40 AM
king will be so full of the ascent of romo and the "tragedy" of eli that CP wont even be worth a mention

SpicyMcHaggis
09-10-2007, 03:19 AM
I agree on every single point, and I'm glad you mentioned the first two. Near the middle of the third quarter I was thinking "uhm, where is this aggressive defense we are supposed to be seeing?"
And Smoot really sucked royally. And he has been horrible for more than 2 years now. I hope he returns to 2004 form, but like I said in the offseason, that is not a guarantee.
I thought Rogers played his usual game (good against the run, great tackler, decent in coverage, no big-play threat whatsoever). Which is fine until you realize he was a top-10 pick.
The run defense was indeed excellent. I can't wait to see how it holds up against a bigger threat than the Dolphins. I think we're gonna be solid there the whole year.

SpicyMcHaggis
09-10-2007, 03:19 AM
king will be so full of the ascent of romo and the "tragedy" of eli that CP wont even be worth a mention
Who ? ;)

SkinKing
09-10-2007, 04:39 AM
I do not think that C. Rogers had a good game. Not as bad as Smoot but he did nothing special to show he is worthy at #2. The defense cannot attack like they wanted because they were going up against a 3 step QB today. They were just begging us to blitz so they can eat us up with slants, screens, and flats. I do agree that we had some issues with PA and then pass to the RB. That was driving me crazy. OVerall I was happy with the defense. I'm not sure why it is a suprise that Smoot gives such a large cushion. He did the same thing for first time he was here. But I like his heart. McIntosh was all over the field. 12 tackles and 1 sack. Impressive. Campbell threw some beautiful deep balls but needs to work on his shorter routes. To many over throws. But overall I'm happy with the win..

Hr fan
09-10-2007, 06:51 AM
Only 7.5 for Scott Suisham? I suppose there might be some deduction for a short kickoff or two but I don't think there's a whole lot more you can ask for.

Does Smoot suck? Or did he just suck today? The big question is what was up with Springs. Cover 2s last year were largely dictated by our secondary so it shouldn't be a surprise that we resorted to it. How can we possibly deactivate Macklin? Was that a sign of faith in Torrence? Yikes.

The secondary should get some credit for no long gainers in the passing game. We got abused in short stuff but that's still a relief compared to what we saw last year. Green never seemed to have anybody to throw to down the field. He often had too much time, but he repeatedly checked the ball down.

Tackling was pretty solid and we did a much better job on 3rd down than we did last season.

Bottom line: we found a way to win. Good teams do that, as we ought to know. And bad teams don't. Just ask Buffalo.

400 yards total offense? I want that! Scott Kendall is a keeper.

No need to reiterate, you got my observations. I would add that Smoot looked as bad yesterday as Rogers did last year, and probably for the same reason - GW's version of the cover 2. When Fred came home he said he was uncomfortable with and misused in the cover 2, he is a man CB. So what does GW do? He plays to the players weakness!

Agree Akh might have been too harsh on Suisham. What else do we want?

Springs is brittle now, but still our best cover corner. If you are playing cover 2 why risk losing him for games where he can be a difference maker?

Canuck
09-10-2007, 08:40 AM
No grade for Springs?

Patrick
09-10-2007, 08:43 AM
Suisham only a 7.5 ........... Man won the game for you with a pressure kick in OT. I don't know about that one Akh.

Farmer Ted
09-10-2007, 09:37 AM
P Derrick Frost: 48.0 Average and 64 yard punt, with a net on 74 yards with the Phins’ penalty on the punt. 8.5


That punt was one of my favorite plays all game. How the hell do the zebras call a holding penalty on John Riggins? What a bunch of maroons.

Hr fan
09-10-2007, 09:44 AM
That punt was one of my favorite plays all game. How the hell do the zebras call a holding penalty on John Riggins? What a bunch of maroons.

Or a false start on Yoder who was at the end of the line and allowed to move prior to the snap. I was and am unaware that the movement of a player eligible to move had to be slow and cautious. Maybe the refs are aware of a rule not in the rule book?

Oregonian
09-10-2007, 10:49 AM
Agree with nearly all of your analysis, Akh.

Props to the Oline and the RBs, who sledgehammered the Dolphins' D with the game on the line. Pete Kendall showed up 2 weeks before the season started and jumped right in. He seems like the kind of smart, capable leader who can help glue the whole line together. Heyer is a huge pickup, a free agent now starting tackle who seems to be able to hold his own.

We have a kicking game. Suisham seems like the real deal, and Frost has been pulverizing the ball since the end of last season.

I agree, Smoot was just toast from start to finish. Why wasn't Springs on the field more? He is getting paid like a shut down corner, and is much closer to one than Smoot.

I think a 6.5 was too generous for Campbell. He killed at least 4 drives with picks or misthrows to wide open guys. Other times he held the ball too long and took bad sacks. BUT- great deep touch, clutch throw to Cooley in OT. If he had played better this game would not have needed to be close. We will need him to step up if we are going to be competitive against better teams.

oldskinfan
09-10-2007, 11:23 AM
- Join the chorus for better grade for Suisham

- Most cliched post-game reporter quote "I guess you can't ice a guy from Canada" referring to 'Fins TO before game winning kick

- I would not fault Smooty too much (except for the dropped pick); some of the cuts Chambers made would have victimized most DBs except maybe for Champ. It seems the D-scheme on the 'Fins was to not get beat deep; I remember the same criticism of Walt Harris 2 years ago, but he may have been doing what the coaches wanted.

akhhorus
09-10-2007, 11:40 AM
Suisham only a 7.5 ........... Man won the game for you with a pressure kick in OT. I don't know about that one Akh.

Well, he made a nice pressure kick, but this wasn't Nick Novak at the end of the Dallas game kicking in a windy stadium from 50ish yards away from the left hash. Suisham had a 38ish yard chip shot from the middle of the field. He played a nice game, but to break past a 7.5 in my book, a Kicker has to hit from 47+ yards.

Battle Cat
09-10-2007, 11:43 AM
Suisham won us the game only thing I can complain about is after the Portis touchdown he kicked off to about the 10-15 yard line and Ted Ginn Jr ran it back out to midfield, when it seemed lik ewe were about to take control. So I would give him a 8.75. Chris Chambers had an off year last year. He had Joey Harrington as a qb but before that Chambers was one of the top wide receivers in the NFL even then with a qb that was not as good as Trent Green.

colkurtz
09-10-2007, 12:44 PM
Excellent article Akh,

Can anyone tell me why Springs isn't playing more? The guy is making $7 mill - are they trying to save him for later in the season?

With little pass rush, the corners are going to get blamed for catches that may not happen with more pass pressure. We are going to be victimized by better passing offenses if the pass rush doesn't improve.

Slobberknocker
09-10-2007, 01:15 PM
I doubt Portis plays in the preseason again. Anybody else lose their lunch when he practically decapitated a guy using his shoulder on a block?

I love his tenacity away from the ball. But in this LT era, guys like Gore and Portis will and should be saved for the regular season.

He can "knock the rust off" in rotation with Betts all game one from now on in my book.

Slobberknocker
09-10-2007, 01:24 PM
Well, he made a nice pressure kick, but this wasn't Nick Novak at the end of the Dallas game kicking in a windy stadium from 50ish yards away from the left hash. Suisham had a 38ish yard chip shot from the middle of the field. He played a nice game, but to break past a 7.5 in my book, a Kicker has to hit from 47+ yards.

I'm sure if he missed it you'd have gone easy on him. :Fruit:

I'll take a low-scoring "automatic" over Novak's 50 yards and a puff of wind any ol' time.

akhhorus
09-10-2007, 01:28 PM
I'm sure if he missed it you'd have gone easy on him. :Fruit:

I'll take a low-scoring "automatic" over Novak's 50 yards and a puff of wind any ol' time.

So will I, but Novak's kick was a better and more clutch kick that would have earned him a higher rating in my book.

Slobberknocker
09-10-2007, 01:33 PM
So will I, but Novak's kick was a better and more clutch kick that would have earned him a higher rating in my book.

I grant you that Novak's kick was more dramatic. It also says a lot that Gibbs put so much faith in Swishy. If we still had St. Nick, there's no way we'd have gone for it on 1st down. Giobbs would have pounded the rock 3 more times and prayed instead.

akhhorus
09-10-2007, 01:37 PM
I grant you that Novak's kick was more dramatic. It also says a lot that Gibbs put so much faith in Swishy. If we still had St. Nick, there's no way we'd have gone for it on 1st down. Giobbs would have pounded the rock 3 more times and prayed instead.

Huh? Suisham was given an easy FG chance for him and this speaks to Gibbs' faith to him?

Slobberknocker
09-10-2007, 01:41 PM
Huh? Suisham was given an easy FG chance for him and this speaks to Gibbs' faith to him?

On 1st down? Absolutely! There are no gimmes from 40 yards. Just ask Michigan.

shally
09-10-2007, 01:45 PM
On 1st down? Absolutely! There are no gimmes from 40 yards. Just ask Michigan.

or scott norwood

akhhorus
09-10-2007, 01:47 PM
On 1st down? Absolutely!

If the snap is bobbled, they could fall on it and still have 2nd/3rd down to move the ball forward.

There are no gimmes from 40 yards. Just ask Michigan.

When the outside blocker decides to not block the inside blitzer, it doesn't matter where you're kicking from.

JoeJacksonTaylor28
09-10-2007, 01:51 PM
- Join the chorus for better grade for Suisham

- Most cliched post-game reporter quote "I guess you can't ice a guy from Canada" referring to 'Fins TO before game winning kick

- I would not fault Smooty too much (except for the dropped pick); some of the cuts Chambers made would have victimized most DBs especially Champ. It seems the D-scheme on the 'Fins was to not get beat deep; I remember the same criticism of Walt Harris 2 years ago, but he may have been doing what the coaches wanted.

Fixed for you.

And I don't agree. What we saw yesterday is classic Smoot, and I really hope Macklin can take over the #3 CB spot. Maybe even #2, lol.

Slobberknocker
09-10-2007, 02:14 PM
Fixed for you.

And I don't agree. What we saw yesterday is classic Smoot, and I really hope Macklin can take over the #3 CB spot. Maybe even #2, lol.

Wow. That was a short honeymoon! Hope Frank gets some good home cookin' this week and his A game back soon.

Farmer Ted
09-10-2007, 02:21 PM
or scott norwood

Norwood's was from 48. Those boneheads got a 5-yard penalty and moved the ball back, as I recall.

JoeJacksonTaylor28
09-10-2007, 02:24 PM
Wow. That was a short honeymoon! Hope Frank gets some good home cookin' this week and his A game back soon.
No honey between me and Smoot ;). With that said, I really hope he can regain his 2004 form.

GibbsFan
09-10-2007, 10:31 PM
Akh, good assessment and mostly agree.

I believe we backed out of Cover 1 because we looked daggum good against the run on the opening series. GW went back to Cover 2 (which is easier to run against) with the thinking we could better neutralize TG and the passing game with this scheme (JMO). I don't like it very much either, because it seems like backing off after landing some solid if not staggering opening punches. Good call on Montgomery, we might actually have something from the 5th round. Hope he keeps it up, and continues to improve.

JC had a slightly off day, with a few of his throws off. He still maintained his usual poise though, and basically ran the team like a veteran. I suppose he had a slightly different perspective as opening day starter as compared to last years mid season entrance. I look for better and brighter days with the emergence of ARE, and Moss should benefit with some single coverage now and then. Next week should be interesting.

akhhorus
09-10-2007, 10:33 PM
Akh, good assessment and mostly agree.

I believe we backed out of Cover 1 because we looked daggum good against the run on the opening series. GW went back to Cover 2 (which is easier to run against) with the thinking we could better neutralize TG and the passing game with this scheme (JMO). I don't like it very much either, because it seems like backing off after landing some solid if not staggering opening punches.


That does make sense, good point. However, when they still could bottle up the run, but the C-2 was causing the Skins problems dealing with the short passes and outside passes, why didn't they switch back?

GibbsFan
09-10-2007, 10:41 PM
That does make sense, good point. However, when they still could bottle up the run, but the C-2 was causing the Skins problems dealing with the short passes and outside passes, why didn't they switch back?

GW stubborness is my theory :bangdesk: