PDA

View Full Version : Dungy: Cutler trade a risk


CarMike
06-04-2009, 05:07 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4230086

Tony Dungy isn't sure Jay Cutler is the answer for the Chicago Bears -- not yet, at least.

The former Indianapolis Colts coach, now a studio football analyst for NBC, on Wednesday questioned whether Cutler had the leadership and maturity to take the Bears to the next level.

Dungy said the Bears gambled when they dealt starter Kyle Orton to the Denver Broncos for Cutler, who had a very messy, public divorce with the Broncos and new coach Josh McDaniel.

"[The Bears] took a risk [trading for Cutler]. I think they took that risk specifically with beating the Green Bay Packers in mind," Dungy said Wednesday, according to the Chicago Tribune. "I really think Chicago gave up a lot to get a quarterback who they believe is going to be the final piece of the puzzle. But I am not sure he has won enough to merit that yet."

Dungy said he recalled that when Bears coach Lovie Smith was hired, he focused on beating the Packers in one of the NFL's oldest and fiercest rivalries.

"[They got] Cutler because of Green Bay's defense and all of the press and man coverage," Dungy said, according to the Tribune. "[The Bears] have to have that threat."

But does Cutler have the maturity to go along with the big arm?

"That remains to be seen. He is a very talented guy who can throw the ball very well. But quarterbacking is so much about leadership and so much about doing things under pressure. There is going to be a lot of pressure on him,"


Tony should do a great job as an analyst. One of the things I'm looking forward to this season.

shally
06-04-2009, 06:39 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4230086



Tony should do a great job as an analyst. One of the things I'm looking forward to this season.

i agree. good comment by TD

BIGREDSKINSFAN1963
06-05-2009, 08:45 AM
i agree. good comment by TD

he reminds me of coach gibbs a lot,and i think he'll be a great studio commentator.:sun:

Ibleedburgundy
06-05-2009, 12:52 PM
I too am looking forward to Dungy's insight. However, in this case he isn't exactly going out on a limb. Everything he said is pretty safe. The Bears did give up a lot for Cutler. And Cutler is somewhat unproven but he has shown some skill.

The interesting part for me is the dynamic he sees playing out between two division rivals. The perspective on that was pretty cool IMO.

CarMike
06-05-2009, 12:58 PM
I too am looking forward to Dungy's insight. However, in this case he isn't exactly going out on a limb. Everything he said is pretty safe. The Bears did give up a lot for Cutler. And Cutler is somewhat unproven but he has shown some skill.

The interesting part for me is the dynamic he sees playing out between two division rivals. The perspective on that was pretty cool IMO.
I'd much prefer other analysts use this thought as well. State the facts as they are. Don't make something out of nothing. Don't embellish things to make it more news worthy.

greatest2
06-06-2009, 01:57 AM
ehh nothing radical.


look, for us on this board and others out there like us, we love football. we know the rules, the plays, how things interact.

therefore this simple commentary by analyst is stuff we know, or stuff for fair weather fans.


really the only thing i watch commentary for is to see if we are being respected, and the cool technology things (i personally like the espn axis).

but i don't need someone explaining the play to me on that technology, or someone telling me sending a kings ransom for a qb who just had a little maturity problem is a risk.

we know football, as long as the analyst doesn't put his foot in his mouth (like emmitt smith, who is by far the worst commentator ever) then its all the same.