Will you vote for George W Bush in 2004? [Archive]

jsarno

10-02-2003, 01:16 PM

YES with a capitol Y-E-S.

How can you not? He's the best we've seen in at least a decade, probably two, and there is not other candidate that is even remotely close to as good as Bush.
every presidential election comes down to the same principle, "the lesser of two evils". Bush is by far the lesser of whatever evil the dems can come up with.

jsarno

10-02-2003, 01:17 PM

(if the dems come up with a qualified candidate, let me know...cause I'm not a party voter, I'm a person voter)

bfauble83

10-02-2003, 04:54 PM

Yes

Minnesota Mike

10-02-2003, 04:57 PM

I voted "NO" but that was only because "HELL NO" wasn't an option.

rskinsfan10

10-02-2003, 09:51 PM

"Hell no" is the only way for me.

AGibbsGirl

10-02-2003, 09:59 PM

Yes!

And I DO vote in every election, so if you want to cancel me out, you had better go to the polls!!!!!!!!!

ArRiNgToN_56

10-02-2003, 11:25 PM

How could you not, i mean who are you going to vote for? Howard Dean? In the famous words of Mark Cuban "I wouldnt trust that guy to Run a 7/11"

Skinzaholic

10-02-2003, 11:29 PM

Yes... Yes (for my wife as well... along with 1000 people in my church)

Seebs

10-03-2003, 04:29 AM

No, but i can't vote in the us... :lol:

Spence

10-03-2003, 07:55 AM

Originally posted by ArRiNgToN_56
How could you not, i mean who are you going to vote for? Howard Dean? In the famous words of Mark Cuban "I wouldnt trust that guy to Run a 7/11" Why not?

The worst job creation record since the Great Depression.
The biggest budget deficit in the history of the world.
Lying to us about Saddam Hussein and 9/11
Lying to us about WMD in Iraq
Lying to us about the cost of the Iraq War

I could go on about environmental protection, taxes, health care, and a dozen other issues, but those five I listed are reasons big enough.

Howard Dean is not my first choice for a Dem candidate, but I'd vote for him in less than a heartbeat over Dubya. I'd vote for any of them. Dean, by the way, balanced the state budget every single year he was governor of Vermont, even though he was under no legal requirement to do so. It'd be nice to see George W Bush balance a budget in Washington, D.C.

Fat chance.

PennSkinsFan

10-03-2003, 09:39 AM

Bush. Ummm, not a chance.

1. Record defecits from wreckless tax cuts

2. Failing health care system

3. Failure to address pormises he made to make prescriptions afoordable and guarantee that no senior has to choose between drugs and food. That is not happening. I see ti inmy office everyday. people are still without coverage and prices are not ssteady for prescription but, continuing to increase.

4. Failed energy policy. For energy related Pres and VP, gas and oil prices are still up

5. Failure in foreign policy. World opinion of America has never ever been lower. After the world ourcry for suppor tof the US after 9/11, it has all bbeen squandered.

6. Iraq. Nuff said. Don't ghet your campaign on a Aircraft Carrier and declare victory until you are ASSURED victory. Instead, i believ the accurate numbers released yesterday show 6-8 american dead per week, and over 40 wounded. That is more than in the actual ground war. He has gotten us in a quagmire taht wil cost hundreds of billions of diollars to get out of.

7. Afghanastan: Bottom line, we bolted and broke promises again. The we wander why our word is not trusted overseas.

8. Economy continues to drag, despite all his economic promises. Tired of hearing over the past two and haklf year, just give me my tax cuts and watch the recovery it will WORK It hasn't.

Actually, I can not think of oen thing that would actually spur me to even thinking about voting for him. Nothign is going right.

Keino

10-03-2003, 11:12 AM

I'd vote for Lyndon Larouche before Monkey Boy(G Dub)

RODDY

10-03-2003, 11:45 AM

Vision, Guts, Brains, Morals etc. This is easy - a BIG YES!

PennSkinsFan

10-03-2003, 11:49 AM

Originally posted by RODDY
Vision, Guts, Brains, Morals etc. This is easy - a BIG YES!

Brains? :whoknows:

Skins57

10-04-2003, 11:49 PM

Originally posted by RODDY
Vision, Guts, Brains, Morals etc. This is easy - a BIG YES!

Vision..... all he sees is oil riggs

Guts.. to blow up innocent people in Iraq (I believe 6000 civilians died in Iraq)

Brains.........he really had to come up with creative ways to blow the surplus Clinton and Gore left him

Morals......I guess telling lies in now morally correct.. Saddam has WMD... SAddam is buy stuff to make Nuclear bombs.... I served in the National Guard Service ,between May 1972 and October 1973
http://www.awolbush.com/
Let start producing nucs again and call them bunker busters.

Lets see Clinton has sex with an intern, Bush is screwing the whole darn nation......morals that is funny
I have never voted in my life but I will be there this time.

oh BTW OHHH HELL NO I would not vote for him ever

Chief Seeway

10-05-2003, 12:54 PM

Originally posted by Spence
Dean, by the way, balanced the state budget every single year he was governor of Vermont, even though he was under no legal requirement to do so.

Impressive! What did that take 10 or 15 minutes? :D :D :D

AGibbsGirl

10-06-2003, 09:02 PM

:funpost:

NCskinsfanatic

10-06-2003, 09:14 PM

I voted yes as well.Bush I see no other viable option.Bush has made mistakes,everything to do with our econonmy isnt his fault.Clinton would have faced the same issues had he been able to remain in office.And IMO he would have delt with them much like he did many other issues denied,shifted blame,lobbed 1 cruise missle and pretend it never happened.I havent always voted republican but i believe in a strong military,less taxation of middle class and poorer people (who actually live in the real world)and less of big brother telling me what to do and when.Bush doesnt offer all these qualities but who does?There is no legitimate canidate and the last thing we need is someone coming in to office in todays global enviroment and pulling a jimmy carter.

jsarno

10-08-2003, 12:21 PM

lets all not forget that Bush before he took office told the country that we were heading into an economic crisis. Funny how he must be a psychic, or just saw that Clinton / Gore really messed up the economy.
I said that before, and it still stands. There is NO WAY this economic recession can be blamed on Bush unless of course you do agree that Bush can see the future.

PS- please don't put your bias in here about Bush's "so called" lies. While some of those lies have already been explained to make them NOT LIES. You have 100% NO PROOF they are indeed "LIES". You're placing them as fact, when in fact they are strictly opinion.
If he lies as much as you guys say he does, then he would have been impeached long ago.
Is killing 6000+ USA haters from a terrorist country such a BAD thing?

jsarno

10-08-2003, 12:24 PM

About the deficit....well I'll gladly go a godzillion in deficit to insure the freedom of our country and that something like 9/11 doesn't happen again. Thank the good Lord for Bush and his willingness to protect us.

Just out of curiousity, how much is your life worth to you? Or your spouses life...or your kids life, or your mother / father / sister / brother's life? Then multiply that figure by population of the USA and when we've hit that as a nation deficit, then come talk to me about it.

Spence

10-08-2003, 03:01 PM

Originally posted by jsarno
lets all not forget that Bush before he took office told the country that we were heading into an economic crisis. I'm leery about getting into this with you, JSARNO, because of your allergy to facts and evidence, but I challenge you to produce that quote. Produce the quote where GWB says, before taking office, that the country is going into an economic crisis. Cite that quote or retract your statement. Thanks.

Spence

10-08-2003, 03:03 PM

Originally posted by jsarno
There is NO WAY this economic recession can be blamed on Bush unless of course you do agree that Bush can see the future. Preparing for the future is the obligation of every policymaker. Mr Bush clearly did not do it. Whether you blame the economy on Mr Bush is not relevant. The poll show that overwhelmingly the country does blame him. As well they should. And that pleases me greatly. In fact, I smile every time I think about it. :D

Spence

10-08-2003, 03:04 PM

Originally posted by jsarno
PS- please don't put your bias in here about Bush's "so called" lies. While some of those lies have already been explained to make them NOT LIES. You have 100% NO PROOF they are indeed "LIES". You're placing them as fact, when in fact they are strictly opinion.
If he lies as much as you guys say he does, then he would have been impeached long ago. Your statement is so general and vague that it is meaningless. Bush lies all the time. Virtually every time he opens his mouth, in fact. Which particular lies did you have in mind?

Spence

10-08-2003, 03:08 PM

Originally posted by jsarno
About the deficit....well I'll gladly go a godzillion in deficit to insure the freedom of our country and that something like 9/11 doesn't happen again. Thank the good Lord for Bush and his willingness to protect us.

Just out of curiousity, how much is your life worth to you? Or your spouses life...or your kids life, or your mother / father / sister / brother's life? Then multiply that figure by population of the USA and when we've hit that as a nation deficit, then come talk to me about it. The deficit, as countless economists have already demonstrated, has not been caused by Osama Bin Laden. It was caused by massive tax cuts for the wealthy with no corresponding spending cuts. If you cut taxes massively and you spend more money than ever and the economy is slow and does not produce increased revenue, massive deficits are the inevitable result. What is so difficult to understand? It is Economics 101.

If our massive budget deficit had anything to do with spending on the Department of Homeland Security or the invasion of Afghanistan, you might have a point. But there is no connection. Our deficit is caused by massive tax cuts for the wealthy, big spending increases on non-defense related items [such as the pork-filled 2003 farm bill], and the invasion of Iraq. And even Mr Bush [as well as Mr Rumsfeld and Mr Powell and Ms Rice] admits that there is no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks of 9/11/01.

Therefore, your points are meaningless or incorrect.

Skins57

10-11-2003, 12:01 PM

Is killing 6000+ USA haters from a terrorist country such a BAD thing?

First off lets see... I am still waiting on the proof the great Bush has that links Saddam to terrorist.
Second so it is alright to go in and murder 6000 people because our leader believes they have ties to terrorist and that would be the goverment not the innocent people. If I lived in Iraq and some arrogant country killed my 4 year old girl and my wife, I sure as hell would do anything and I do mean anything to get back at the people that took my family from me. In a sense we have become a terrorist nation ourselves and that is what is wrong with this war. It is all bases on idea and lies that have not been proven. It is wierd how the start of the war was about getting the WMD but then when we realized there was none (proof, is what I want and they can't get it) but now it is about freeing the Iraqi people. BS is all it is. I bet Halliburton enjoys getting that huge oil contract with out other companies having a chance to do that, I bet ole Dick and Bush had nothing to do with that.

I heard a quote the other day that sums it up for me

" In a world where you can not jail or kill all your enemies, we must try to make more friends and less terrorist"

BigCountry

10-11-2003, 05:13 PM

Terrorist country?! How are the people at fault for the fact that Iraq harbored terrorists? It's pretty much beyond reasoning with whoever just said it's ok to kill 6000 people because they live in Iraq. That's just sad.

rskinsfan10

10-11-2003, 08:52 PM

Hmmmm.......

dukeuch

10-11-2003, 08:53 PM

Originally posted by BigCountry
Terrorist country?! How are the people at fault for the fact that Iraq harbored terrorists? It's pretty much beyond reasoning with whoever just said it's ok to kill 6000 people because they live in Iraq. That's just sad.

It's worse than sad, it's just not true. It is widely acknowledged that there are far more terrorists in Iraq now than before the war, and there were/are many more links between terrorists and Saudi Arabia than there were with/in Iraq.

BigCountry

10-11-2003, 08:58 PM

Even if it was true, you don't come out and ask what's wrong with killing 6000 people.

rskinsfan10

10-11-2003, 09:00 PM

Trust me, I'm with you on that one Uri. I totally agree.

hail2skins

10-11-2003, 09:30 PM

I would not vote for Bush under any circumstance and that "what's wrong with killing 6000 innocent people" comment is just downright sad. I guess if the shoe was on the other foot, you would feel different about it. I just can't believe that comment.

Skins57

10-12-2003, 03:25 AM

I guess I should say that in other nations eyes we are the terroits and we have killed innocent people for something thier goverment may or may not have been doing. Think about These terorist kill 3000 americans who lived here so we strike back and they lose 6000 innocents which is twice the amount we did. The " terrorist attcked civilians, we did not but teh result was the same. many many dead people for no reason

dukeuch

10-15-2003, 10:45 AM

Would I vote for Bush? Lets see...

1) We went to war in Iraq to protect ourselves from the imminent threat of weapons of mass destruction which have not been found and probably do not exist. Oh yea, also because Hussien had an Al Qaeda connection, which now even Bush admits he did not. Of course, in the power vacumn in Iraq right now, there has been an influx of terrorists.

2) To battle record budget deficits, he enacted massive tax cuts (sort of like Reagan, who tripled the national debt).

3) To enhance clean air and reduce acid rain producing emmisions, he is loosening new technology requirements so the plant owners can realize higher profits, which they will then volutarily spend on new, cleaner technology.

4) To preserve national parks from the damage caused by forest fires, he wants to open the areas to increased logging. (In a weird way, he is right on this one, less trees probably will reduce the risk of fires. Sounds like something my seven year old would come up with, think about, and then reject).

5) To help endangered species, he wants to lift the ban on US import of hides, animals, etc. of those species, so that the governments in these countries can reap revenue which they can then use to protect those species. (Hell, if that will work, why not make the import of cocaine, opium, pot, etc legal so that the producing countries have more $ to go after the growers?).

This guy has simply stepped through the looking glass.

Keino

10-15-2003, 05:45 PM

So Dukeuch does that mean you will or won't be voting for Bush in '04 :D

Minnesota Mike

10-16-2003, 01:38 PM

It sounds like he's undecided.

Skinzaholic

10-16-2003, 02:26 PM

OK... let's tally... 472 members.... small handful of Bush haters... small handful of Bush lovers.... one out of country Skin fan.... and the rest are...................

uninterested?
uninvolved?
cant understand the ballot process?
cant read?
illegal aliens?

What gives?

lakewinola

10-16-2003, 02:37 PM

I voted, but did not comment, so here you go. I voted no because I want someone who I trust, and has some bit of respect for the office. Not someone who will continue to lie and skew the facts to support his various agenda. I think a lot of people voted for him because he was a so called "uniter not a divider", well we know that is not true.

If you run as a moderate and govern as an extreamist, you have no chance to win re-election because you have offened 40% of the people who voted for you.

Spence

10-16-2003, 03:43 PM

Originally posted by Skinzaholic
OK... let's tally... 472 members.... small handful of Bush haters... small handful of Bush lovers.... one out of country Skin fan.... and the rest are...................

uninterested?
uninvolved?
cant understand the ballot process?
cant read?
illegal aliens?

What gives? Unfortunately, Kevin, most Americans don't give a frog's fat ass what goes on in their own country, so long as they can buy the car they like and watch the TV shows they like.

Skins57

10-17-2003, 03:03 AM

Originally posted by Spence
Unfortunately, Kevin, most Americans don't give a frog's fat ass what goes on in their own country, so long as they can buy the car they like and watch the TV shows they like.

Which is where most of the problem begins. People need to care:(

BigCountry

10-17-2003, 01:31 PM

If I could vote, I'd dive of building onto a thumb tac before I vote for Bush, if that hasn't been made clear already :D

Minnesota Mike

10-17-2003, 01:35 PM

Originally posted by Skins57
Which is where most of the problem begins. People need to care:(

I think alot of people are too concerned about "putting food on their family" to pay attention to politics.

Skinzaholic

10-17-2003, 02:15 PM

Originally posted by Minnesota Mike
I think alot of people are too concerned about "putting food on their family" to pay attention to politics.

Well... that is quite a shame. We all work hard and long hours each day... yet where is the benefit in turning a blind eye while others make decisions for us all? The problem is that we have lived in the best country in the world all of our lives. None of us know what it is like to be controlled by the government 100%. Elsewhere in the world there are people who would give their lives (and have) for the privilage that we take for granted... the privilage to vote.

I agree with the next person that politics in general is like watching a group of 3rd graders debate the molecular structure of an atom... but I still stay involved because I care what sort of America my two daughters will live in. If me (and others like me) just concentrate on "putting food on the table" then what will the Democrats do to America?

higgybaby

10-18-2003, 12:09 PM

A vote for Bush from me.

Skinzaholic

10-18-2003, 01:39 PM

Good job Higgy!

NamVet4

10-27-2003, 12:16 PM

Originally posted by Skinzaholic
OK... let's tally... 472 members.... small handful of Bush haters... small handful of Bush lovers.... one out of country Skin fan.... and the rest are...................

uninterested?
uninvolved?
cant understand the ballot process?
cant read?
illegal aliens?

What gives?

Perhaps those "rest" do not feel this forum and MB is the place that they want to commit to answer the question; or perhaps they just don't bother to answer polls that they interpret as having no relevance and/or impact on the issue. We are a sports franchise MB, a great one at that, no doubt, but not the forum of the recognized political parties.

my 2 cents

PennSkinsFan

10-28-2003, 03:55 PM

Fortunately the latest polls show Bush in deep trouble. I have also seen Pennsylvania polls that show Bush behind unnamed Dems, a state that he must have, that he won't have.

Skins57

10-28-2003, 11:56 PM

He did not win PA last election either. I have always considered PA very republican

roberro

10-29-2003, 02:36 AM

Originally posted by RODDY
Vision, Guts, Brains, Morals etc. This is easy - a BIG YES!

You have got to be kidding, right? Please tell me you are kidding. "HaHa, I was just kidding". This moron is a puppet of Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz (bet HE never goes back to Bagdad). To think that the American people could be duped into voting for this swaggering, sneering jerk is mind boggling. Just like his daddy, he will be a one term president. For the record, I voted for his daddy both times. I AM an independent voter.

Spence

10-29-2004, 11:34 AM

For the record, I voted for his daddy both times. I AM an independent voter.Someone from South Carolina who voted for Bush in 1988 and 1992 and is voting for Kerry in 2004? You're not just independent, sir, you're almost unique! :)

akhhorus

10-29-2004, 11:47 AM

Someone from South Carolina who voted for Bush in 1988 and 1992 and is voting for Kerry in 2004? You're not just independent, sir, you're almost unique! :)

he is from Beaufort.......

Spence

10-29-2004, 11:50 AM

he is from Beaufort.......I'm a Yankee, mate. Enlighten me.

Spence

10-29-2004, 11:51 AM

My favorite quote about the South [and I offer this for reasons of humor only, not because I believe it to be true] came from Peter Griffin on "The Family Guy:"The Deep South? Isn't that the place where all the black guys are lazy and the white guys are just as lazy but they're angry with the black guys for being lazy?"

akhhorus

10-29-2004, 12:06 PM

I'm a Yankee, mate. Enlighten me.

South Carolina is three parts:
Up-Country(Greenville area): your typical deep south community(religious, drunk, no fun on the weekends)
Midlands(Columbia): about the same as Up-Country, with a little more drinking and a little more fun
Low Country(Charleston and south)(Myrtle Beach is NOT part of the RSC): Drunk, armed, crazy

Beaufort is south of here, and all you need to know is that it is stuck between the Sanity gravity wells of Savannah and Charleston. It's where the people too crazy for either go.

Spence

10-29-2004, 12:07 PM

So it might be fun?

fent

10-29-2004, 12:09 PM

So it might be fun?

i think this might be an understatement.

akhhorus

10-29-2004, 12:09 PM

So it might be fun?

eh...too small. More like an open air asylum. Plus, you dont drink....

SkinsD

10-29-2004, 12:40 PM

Kerry all the way!

God help us if Bush is reelected.

PyroGenic

10-29-2004, 01:04 PM

id vote for kerry, i dont trust bush and how he's copying his father on focusing on the dem's flip flopping... is changing your mind (if you're wrong) and not supporting poorly put together bills in favor of better ones a bad thing? I think that's ridiculous. Whoever says that killing people is okay and that bush is a smart man must not be exposed to enough media... Bush's plan in Iraq has failed miserably and there's way too many lives being taken away...if you saw what those people in Iraq go through because of us you'd see that you are wrong... and if you dont there is something seriously wrong with you. Plus defecit is bad and bush isnt going to fix it.... :rolleyes:

Jimreaper007

10-29-2004, 02:22 PM

(if the dems come up with a qualified candidate, let me know...cause I'm not a party voter, I'm a person voter)

Ummmmm...ok

:lol1:

skins74

10-29-2004, 02:27 PM

VOTE FOR BUSH!

#1SkInSfAn

10-29-2004, 02:32 PM

I voted yes because IMO he is the lesser of two evils and he's an evil that I know. Sure he'll screw up the presidency more often then not but keryy could easily be a robot. Think about it, all those non-fluid movements that mono-tone voice and those blank expressions all the time. When someone attacks us he'll just be able to waive his arms about and say "DANGER DANGER" Only joking of course but I am voting for dubya just because he is the evil that I know.

Jimreaper007

10-29-2004, 02:39 PM

No,

(IMO)

As a soldier I went to war under Bush's command. I can say that I would not follow that man out of a building that was on fire.

GW Bush ducks all accountability when things go wrong, but is the first guy on the deck of an aircraft carrier when things are going well.

He has lied to the American people repeatedly and he is unfit to run an Exxon, let alone the country.

akhhorus

10-29-2004, 02:42 PM

VOTE FOR AKH!

Spence

10-29-2004, 02:44 PM

Okay, I'm moving this to the "Who Do You Plan to Vote For" thread. Please: No threads just encouraging people to vote for Kerry or Bush or anyone else. If you've got something substantive to say, go ahead. But simply urging people to vote or declaring your own allegiances can go in a pre-existing thread. I don't want this forum clogged up with two dozen competing threads, all urging people to vote for one candidate or another.

JoeDaSchmoe

10-29-2004, 05:52 PM

I voted "NO" but that was only because "HELL NO" wasn't an option.

Wow, freaky, that's exactly what I was going to write before I scrolled down.

Minnesota Mike

10-29-2004, 06:00 PM

I voted "NO" but that was only because "HELL NO" wasn't an option.

Since this was originally post over a year ago (10/02/03), I thought I should go ahead and re-confirm this position.

Still no change - HELL NO!

Jimreaper007

10-29-2004, 06:23 PM

Since this was originally post over a year ago (10/02/03), I thought I should go ahead and re-confirm this position.

Still no change - HELL NO!

Is there a stronger way to say no F*ckin Way?????

Cuz if there is....

Carmelo

10-29-2004, 06:35 PM

No. I'm actually afraid of what's going to happen to this country if Cheney is reelected President. What really scares me is if we have another 'florida' and Bush gets in again with what akh calls douchebagery (sp). I think that would rip the country apart. Maybe I'll just vote for akh.

akhhorus

10-29-2004, 06:43 PM

LATrueRedskin

10-29-2004, 06:55 PM

I vote for the Guerilla Candidate! (I don't see myself voting for Bush ever in life).

Carmelo

10-29-2004, 06:58 PM

we thank you for your support...
Akh, you must promise me one thing though. When you mess up, look me square in the face and say, "Melo, I f***ed up. It was my mistake, I had a little to much Beam, but I've learned from it. Let's move on... live and learn." If you can do that, you've got my vote.

We all know kerry is semi-decent (could do better) at blasting bush for his mistakes but I'm silently wondering how he deals with his own mistakes. So if you've got that one corner covered, I'm with you akh!

akhhorus

10-29-2004, 07:00 PM

Akh, you must promise me one thing though. When you mess up, look me square in the face and say, "Melo, I f***ed up. It was my mistake, I had a little to much Beam, but I've learned from it. Let's move on... live and learn." If you can do that, you've got my vote.

We all know kerry is semi-decent (could do better) at blasting bush for his mistakes but I'm silently wondering how he deals with his own mistakes. So if you've got that one corner covered, I'm with you akh!

I promise.

RedskinsDave

10-29-2004, 07:01 PM

I am voting Akhh. My first order as SecDef will be to destroy the rogue Red Sox Nation. They are already nearly a police state so it won't be too difficult to destroy. We will confuse them by replacing all restaurant items with fried chicken, grits and SoCo.

bfauble83

10-29-2004, 07:07 PM

As Bush said fool me once, shame, shame on you...fool me twice.............you ain't going to fool me again.

HELL NO

JoeDaSchmoe

10-29-2004, 07:26 PM

RedskinsDave

10-29-2004, 07:33 PM

It's Civil War time.

I must remember to take into account the recent alien loyalists around the country. They will all be sent to Gitmo where they will be forced to wear pinstripes until they denounce their inexplicable affiliation.

akhhorus

10-29-2004, 07:35 PM

It's Civil War time.

Hey....that's "The War of Northern Aggression"...get it right...

IMALILTEAPOT

10-29-2004, 07:47 PM

my school(Springbrook High) had a mock election today and 83% of the school voted for John Kerry. I WAS ONE OF THEM BABBBBBBBBBBBBYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!

JoeDaSchmoe

10-29-2004, 07:48 PM

I must remember to take into account the recent alien loyalists around the country. They will all be sent to Gitmo where they will be forced to wear pinstripes until they denounce their inexplicable affiliation.

Give me "idiots" or give me death!

LadyNRedskinsfan

10-29-2004, 07:49 PM

im gonna go with "hell no! for 1000" alex.

GibbsRules!

10-29-2004, 08:48 PM

my school(Springbrook High) had a mock election today and 83% of the school voted for John Kerry. I WAS ONE OF THEM BABBBBBBBBBBBBYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!
Hey youngskin, I went to Springbrook back in '81. Don't know if they always vote Democrat, but in this election, it is a wise move!
Keep 'em straight Youngskin!

IMALILTEAPOT

10-29-2004, 08:54 PM

Hey youngskin, I went to Springbrook back in '81. Don't know if they always vote Democrat, but in this election, it is a wise move!
Keep 'em straight Youngskin!
wow thats cool. hey do u remember mrs. abeshouse? I know shes been at springbrook for a long time and i wanna see how long. she teaches english

GibbsRules!

10-29-2004, 09:07 PM

wow thats cool. hey do u remember mrs. abeshouse? I know shes been at springbrook for a long time and i wanna see how long. she teaches english
I don't remember her, was she married back in the day? Maybe she went by her maiden name...I used to live in White Oak, on the corner of Colesville and New Hampshire Ave. It used to be called the Point, big condo building...

DPHoo

10-29-2004, 09:46 PM

I vote yes because

1) Treating terrorism as a war unlike previous Clinton administration. 75% of Al Quada leaders captured or dead.

2) He has convictions unlike Sen. Kerry who is lost and can't find his way home.

3) Tax cuts kept Pres. Clinton's recession to a shallow level. The unemployment level is .2% higher compared to Pres. Clinton's reelection bid in 1996 and we overcame the tech bubble bursting, corporate scandals, 9/11 (ONE MILLION JOBS lost in October 2001) and Pres. Clinton's recession.

4) You got to give him credit for trying to work with Sen. Kennedy on education.

5) John McCain supports him.

6) Rudy supports him.

7) He is as hated in Europe as Pres. Reagan which is a favorable comparison.

8) He is pro-life.

9) Per NBC, Pres. Bush has a higher IQ than Sen. Kerry on their military test.

10) Sen. Kerry is not a leader and he has a global test that would lead to inaction.

11) Senators do not make good presidents but governor's do.

rskinsfan10

10-29-2004, 10:18 PM

im gonna go with "hell no! for 1000" alex.

Ken Jennings doesn't have a thing on you.

straightupbeast

10-29-2004, 10:36 PM

how could you vote for bush? i mean after those past 4 years...wow...it really is amazing that this election is close...just imagine how much of a better world this would be without bush in office and gore in office...but bush stole the election

Skins57

10-30-2004, 12:06 AM

I wonder myself, what the hell the people voting for Bush see, i may never know. I was one those people that just satback and watch year after year and complained about our president but the last 4 years combined with the BS of the last election have shown me that I have to vote and I dove head first into volunteering my time to my cause. I have met so many wonderful people during my volunteering that I honestly believe thier might be hope for the world yet :D

Also I believe the election may turn on PAs swing and for that I hope I did enough to swing even a few voters in my area and help win PA for the Dems again

LadyNRedskinsfan

10-30-2004, 01:02 AM

Ken Jennings doesn't have a thing on you.
thanks kenny, but i think he has about 2 million things on me! ;)

Axegrinder

10-30-2004, 05:22 AM

"Hell no" is the only way for me.
Likewise!

redskin2117

10-30-2004, 06:59 AM

I say yes, only because there isn't a HELL YES! And for anyone who doesn't like tax breaks, please, go ahead and pay more. Its better your money sits in the surplus than mine.

JoeDaSchmoe

10-30-2004, 11:43 AM

I say yes, only because there isn't a HELL YES! And for anyone who doesn't like tax breaks, please, go ahead and pay more. Its better your money sits in the surplus than mine.

Perhaps we're in the income level that doesn't receive the benefits of those tax breaks?

Skins57

10-30-2004, 11:58 AM

I say yes, only because there isn't a HELL YES! And for anyone who doesn't like tax breaks, please, go ahead and pay more. Its better your money sits in the surplus than mine.

Maybe just maybe I don't want my 11 year old paying for these tax breaks when she starts working

thickskin

10-31-2004, 07:31 PM

Yes... Yes (for my wife as well... along with 1000 people in my church)

nice sig. how about this one.
Your Church -- 1000 squalid poltroons believing in ritualized cannibalism and voting for a moron

i'm thick s kin, and i approved this message

Jimreaper007

10-31-2004, 07:39 PM

Ummm....no

Nyet, Nada....

BRAVEONAWARPATH

10-31-2004, 07:50 PM

I'd rather cover myself with Barbecue sauce among a group
of Komodo dragons then vote for that traitor Bush!!

Jimreaper007

11-01-2004, 07:41 AM

I'd rather cover myself with Barbecue sauce among a group
of Komodo dragons then vote for that traitor Bush!!

I'll put that in the no box....

:lol1:

dukeuch

11-01-2004, 09:26 AM

I say yes, only because there isn't a HELL YES! And for anyone who doesn't like tax breaks, please, go ahead and pay more. Its better your money sits in the surplus than mine.

Wow, what are you going to do with your extra $1/day (assuming your income is less than $200K)?

Spence

11-01-2004, 10:04 AM

I say yes, only because there isn't a HELL YES! And for anyone who doesn't like tax breaks, please, go ahead and pay more. Its better your money sits in the surplus than mine.What surplus? We don't have a surplus anymore. We did when Bush got into the White House. He got rid of the biggest budget surpluses in human history and he did it in record time.

Spence

11-01-2004, 10:04 AM

nice sig. how about this one.
Your Church -- 1000 squalid poltroons believing in ritualized cannibalism and voting for a moron

i'm thick s kin, and i approved this messageBrutal but funny.

dukeuch

11-01-2004, 11:10 AM

A vote for Bush from me.

Interesting signature line: How does it relate to Bush's witholding the administration's "proof" of WMD (back then and today), refusal to provide information regarding the role or names of the industry representative to our environmental plan, the case against the thousands of suspected terrorists which have been/are being arrested, detained and deported? This is by far the most secretive administration of the past 50 years.

Jimreaper007

11-01-2004, 12:08 PM

Interesting signature line: How does it relate to Bush's witholding the administration's "proof" of WMD (back then and today), refusal to provide information regarding the role or names of the industry representative to our environmental plan, the case against the thousands of suspected terrorists which have been/are being arrested, detained and deported? This is by far the most secretive administration of the past 50 years.

The are so secretive that they don't know what they are doing usually.

(it shows)