The Roots of Obama Worhip

[tuckahoeskin]

Excellent article in The Weekly Standard about Obama. Written by a Political Science Professor from UVA. Long read, with a lot of depth, but pretty good.

http://www.theweeklystandard.com/articles/roots-obama-worship

[Ibleedburgundy]

If you like that website you might like these too:

Newsmax
frontpagmag
worldnetdaily
michellemalkin.com
mcconnel.senate.gov
spectator.org

Works better if these are the only websites you read.

[RedskinsDave]

The weekly standard isn't quite like those.

[tuckahoeskin]

If you like that website you might like these too:

Newsmax
frontpagmag
worldnetdaily
michellemalkin.com
mcconnel.senate.gov
spectator.org

Works better if these are the only websites you read.

Did you bother to read the article or did you blast your typical lib ad hominem attack? If you didn't bother to read the article, then the same could be tossed right back at you. Enjoy your New Republic, The Nation, New York Times breakfast, followed by your MSNBC lunch and Olberman/Madow dinner. Say hi to all the kids at Kos, Huffington, and Democratic Underground while your at it! :)

[Ibleedburgundy]

Did you bother to read the article or did you blast your typical lib ad hominem attack? If you didn't bother to read the article, then the same could be tossed right back at you. Enjoy your New Republic, The Nation, New York Times breakfast, followed by your MSNBC lunch and Olberman/Madow dinner. Say hi to all the kids at Kos, Huffington, and Democratic Underground while your at it! :)

Of course I didn't read the article. I'm not an aspiring Republican. That stuff is strictly for you guys. I hope that article serves it's intended purpose of reinforcing the Republicans good/Dems bad mindset.

I don't bother with any of the outlets you listed. That would be rather hypocritical.

I don't agree that my attack was ad hominem. The weeklystandard's partisanship is absolutely relevant to their partisan article. I like how you attribute that to liberalism though, as if Republicans never have issues with certain news outlets.

[tuckahoeskin]

Of course I didn't read the article. I'm not an aspiring Republican. That stuff is strictly for you guys. I hope that article serves it's intended purpose of reinforcing the Republicans good/Dems bad mindset.

I don't bother with any of the outlets you listed. That would be rather hypocritical.

I don't agree that my attack was ad hominem. The weeklystandard's partisanship is absolutely relevant to their partisan article. I like how you attribute that to liberalism though, as if Republicans never have issues with certain news outlets.

Well, how typically open minded. Didn't bother to read the article, yet feel perfectly comfortable to comment. It would be better for the discussion if you would read it, then comment about points you like or dislike. Don't simply dismiss it because it comes from a source you consider "right-wing".

If you were to post an article from one of your favorite websites, I would at the very least read it and offer points where I might disagree. Doing so would be to advance the debate and possibly come to some area of agreement. It's far more constructive than simply dismissing an item because it comes from those mean, nasty evil conservatives. Boo hoo hoo. :sun:

[RedskinsDave]

Of course I didn't read the article. I'm not an aspiring Republican. That stuff is strictly for you guys. I hope that article serves it's intended purpose of reinforcing the Republicans good/Dems bad mindset.

I don't bother with any of the outlets you listed. That would be rather hypocritical.

I don't agree that my attack was ad hominem. The weeklystandard's partisanship is absolutely relevant to their partisan article. I like how you attribute that to liberalism though, as if Republicans never have issues with certain news outlets.

You know you're better off just not responding if this is the drivel you're going to come up with. You recently posted something that was the length of War and Peace. I didn't read it all, therefore I didn't comment (I did comment on Boston's post though). Its not that hard.