2010 Fantasy Football Advice Thread

[dj_stouty]

The '09 Thread is HERE (http://www.hailredskins.com/vbforum/showthread.php?t=49390).

Good luck to everyone as they start preparing for their '10 drafts this summer/fall.

[CarMike]

Early question: Do I keep Clinton Portis on my keeper league team?

Here's who else I have:

Adrian Peterson / Chester Taylor / Glenn Coffee / Correll Buckhalter / Jerious Norwood

Right now I'm inclined to say yes just to wait and see what happens in Washington with LJ / Parker / Torrain. Chester Taylor moving to Chicago is interesting since they have Matt Forte. All the rest are probably getting cut.

Thoughts?

[NCskinsfanatic]

Early question: Do I keep Clinton Portis on my keeper league team?

Here's who else I have:

Adrian Peterson / Chester Taylor / Glenn Coffee / Correll Buckhalter / Jerious Norwood

Right now I'm inclined to say yes just to wait and see what happens in Washington with LJ / Parker / Torrain. Chester Taylor moving to Chicago is interesting since they have Matt Forte. All the rest are probably getting cut.

Thoughts?

I like Portis over Coffee, Buckhalter and Norwood Mike. Taylor could be a nice addition for da bears, especially if Forte continues to regress.

[NamVet4]

Early question: Do I keep Clinton Portis on my keeper league team?

Here's who else I have:

Adrian Peterson / Chester Taylor / Glenn Coffee / Correll Buckhalter / Jerious Norwood

Right now I'm inclined to say yes just to wait and see what happens in Washington with LJ / Parker / Torrain. Chester Taylor moving to Chicago is interesting since they have Matt Forte. All the rest are probably getting cut.

Thoughts?

I like Portis over Coffee, Buckhalter and Norwood Mike. Taylor could be a nice addition for da bears, especially if Forte continues to regress.


Mike,
I am suspect of the running game for "Da Bears" . . .especially with the new OC as Mike Martz. At best, IMHO, "Da Bears" will run tandem backs, but there will not be a strong push to develop a serious running game for either of them.

[fent]

I drew the 6-hole in my 12-team pay league. Scoring is pretty standard, but at 100 yards, rushers get a 5 point bonus, receivers get a 7. From past drafting history, I don't expect any big surprises in the top 4 (i.e. no Brees/Rodgers in the top 4), so it's looking like I'll have my choice of at least 2 of Turner, Gore, and Andre at 6. Anyone have thoughts on what order to rank those? I think I lean Turner, Andre, Gore, but our league has so historically valued QB (most of them still draft like it's 2000), that I keep going back and forth on whether Andre's worth it over Gore.

[dj_stouty]

I drew the 6-hole in my 12-team pay league. Scoring is pretty standard, but at 100 yards, rushers get a 5 point bonus, receivers get a 7. From past drafting history, I don't expect any big surprises in the top 4 (i.e. no Brees/Rodgers in the top 4), so it's looking like I'll have my choice of at least 2 of Turner, Gore, and Andre at 6. Anyone have thoughts on what order to rank those? I think I lean Turner, Andre, Gore, but our league has so historically valued QB (most of them still draft like it's 2000), that I keep going back and forth on whether Andre's worth it over Gore.

If you were in a 10-owner league, I'd suggest Andre....but with 12, running backs are at a premium. Plus...the pickings at RB will be slim once you get to your 3rd pick looking for RB2. I'd go Gore over Turner...simply because Turner isn't a factor in the passing game and Gore is always good for 45-50 catches. I'd also consider S Jackson here because you know he is good for 300 carries and a bunch of catches.

For #18, you should hopefully have a pick from DeAngelo, Ced Ben or Ryan Grant. Any combination should set you up nicely at RB/RB.

For your 3rd pick...hopefully a WR like brandon Marshall, Colston or Desean will be sitting there for ya.

If QBs fall of the board in droves as you expect...then load up on playmakers and then go after QB value in the later rounds such as Flacco, Ryan or Eli.

[fent]

If you were in a 10-owner league, I'd suggest Andre....but with 12, running backs are at a premium. Plus...the pickings at RB will be slim once you get to your 3rd pick looking for RB2. I'd go Gore over Turner...simply because Turner isn't a factor in the passing game and Gore is always good for 45-50 catches. I'd also consider S Jackson here because you know he is good for 300 carries and a bunch of catches.

For #18, you should hopefully have a pick from DeAngelo, Ced Ben or Ryan Grant. Any combination should set you up nicely at RB/RB.

For your 3rd pick...hopefully a WR like brandon Marshall, Colston or Desean will be sitting there for ya.

If QBs fall of the board in droves as you expect...then load up on playmakers and then go after QB value in the later rounds such as Flacco, Ryan or Eli.

Thanks for the help. That should read RB's in the last thought, not QBs. Not sure how I did that.

I've thought about Jackson there, but I just don't know how excited I can get about him as a number 1 back. He's always dealing with nagging injuries, and that line didn't get any better this season.

[RedskinsDave]

Early question: Do I keep Clinton Portis on my keeper league team?

Here's who else I have:

Adrian Peterson / Chester Taylor / Glenn Coffee / Correll Buckhalter / Jerious Norwood

Right now I'm inclined to say yes just to wait and see what happens in Washington with LJ / Parker / Torrain. Chester Taylor moving to Chicago is interesting since they have Matt Forte. All the rest are probably getting cut.

Thoughts?

Well Coffee made this decision easy.

[CarMike]

Well Coffee made this decision easy.

LOL, no kidding. :)

[skin4ever]

never did a 12 team league before. Any advice as to the changes from a 10 team league? I know Rbs will be at a premium(thanks DJ Stouty, read earlier post) but how does the drafting go. are WR's taken later meaning i will have a shot at some top guys in rd 3 while guys like grant go in rd 2. Thanks guys. ANy advice is greatly appreciated.

[dj_stouty]

never did a 12 team league before. Any advice as to the changes from a 10 team league? I know Rbs will be at a premium(thanks DJ Stouty, read earlier post) but how does the drafting go. are WR's taken later meaning i will have a shot at some top guys in rd 3 while guys like grant go in rd 2. Thanks guys. ANy advice is greatly appreciated.

A lot of it has to do with the scoring of your league. If QBs get 6pts/TD then several could slip into the first round. If they get 4pts/TD, they will fall much further.

But regardless...RBs are still at a premium; especially now-a-days with more teams featuring shared RB duties rather than 1 premier 25-touches-per-game RB. I've found most owners will want to walk away from the first round with a RB/RB situation. There will always be owners who simply can't let Andre Johnson, Brees or Moss stay on the table late in the first round that will help you out.

I looked at some ADP results (based on QB getting 4pts) and here are some averages for 12-owner leagues in the first four rounds...

First round
RBs Taken - 8
WRs Taken - 2
QBs Taken- 2

1st round Analysis: Someone is itching for Andre, Moss, Brees and possibly Rodgers. Let them! Snatch your franchise RB and don't think twice about it.

Second round........... Total after 2 rounds
RBs Taken - 4........... RBs Taken - 12
WRs Taken - 7........... WRs Taken - 9
QBs Taken- 1.............. QBs Taken - 3

2nd round analysis: WRs start flying off the board. Either start that WR run by taking Reggie Wayne early in the round...or stay clear and pick up one of the solid RB2 options who may have fallen to the 2nd like Ryan Matthews or DeAngelo Williams.

Third round................. Total after 3 rounds
RBs Taken - 5.............. RBs Taken - 17
WRs Taken - 5............. WRs Taken - 14
QBs Taken- 2............... QBs Taken - 5

3rd round analysis: Things start to spread out while owners try and balance their rosters. The top 5 stud QBs are off the table, so if you didnt' get one by now, consider holding off a few rounds while you stock up on RB/WR. Cutler, Kolb, Favre and Flacco could be available in the 5th - 7th rounds.

Fouth round Total after 4 rounds
RBs Taken - 4................. RBs Taken - 21
WRs Taken - 4............... WRs Taken - 18
QBs Taken- 2.................. QBs Taken - 7
TEs Taken - 2................. TEs Taken - 2

4th round analysis - i'm surprised at how owners are downgrading RBs this year. After 4 rounds and at least 3 owners haven't filled their RB2 spot yet. Clark and Gates are starting to get looks in this round...but the big TE run will occur in the 5th when Whitten, Vernon, Finley (and possibly Gonzo and/or Celek) will be drafted.

OK...so after looking at the above, I'm not 100% sure my RB/RB philosophy is the best for this year - or even attainable. I guess it depends on your draft position and how the rest of your league drafts.

Also - Bye weeks are more meaningful in 12-owners leagues. Since roster talent is more spread out, you don't want too many starters to share the same bye. If I'm 50/50 on two players, their bye week will be a big factor in who I choose.

[fent]

OK...so after looking at the above, I'm not 100% sure my RB/RB philosophy is the best for this year - or even attainable. I guess it depends on your draft position and how the rest of your league drafts.

You obviously have to play your draft by ear, but it looks like the best bet this year may be RB/WR/RB in that order. Most of my mocks have looked like that so far because if I wait until the 3rd for a WR, I'm stuck choosing between the Steve Smiths as my top option.

[dj_stouty]

You obviously have to play your draft by ear, but it looks like the best bet this year may be RB/WR/RB in that order. Most of my mocks have looked like that so far because if I wait until the 3rd for a WR, I'm stuck choosing between the Steve Smiths as my top option.

I'm thinking the same thing...plus there seems to be a bunch of value RBs found in the 7th and 8th rounds this year. Due to the popularity of RBBC, there are more RBs in inventory. Untypically deep draft for this position.

As far as I'm concerned...the owners taking QB or WR with their 6th through 8th picks may be screwed when it comes to RB availability with their 2nd round pick.

Scenario after scenario and I keep seeing 9th overall being the traditional RB/RB spot with SJAX or Matthews pairing up with either DeAngelo or Mendenhall. Not a bad outcome, here.

Assuming the top 5 spots go to RBs...it may be impossible for them to go RB with their second picks; especially with attractive WRs available like Roddy, Austin, CJ and Marshall.

I remember back in the day when WR/WR was an alternative drafting at 11th or 12th. The idea was that you would lock up the league's top 2 WRs thus diminishing everyone else's returns at WR. Not sure how often it is used now, especially with Moss and Andre going so early in the round.

Another antiquated strategy was RB/RB/RB. No chance that ever happens again with the way RBs split carries these days. It was a solid strategy 5-6 years ago...

[fent]

I'm thinking the same thing...plus there seems to be a bunch of value RBs found in the 7th and 8th rounds this year. Due to the popularity of RBBC, there are more RBs in inventory. Untypically deep draft for this position.

As far as I'm concerned...the owners taking QB or WR with their 6th through 8th picks may be screwed when it comes to RB availability with their 2nd round pick.

Scenario after scenario and I keep seeing 9th overall being the traditional RB/RB spot with SJAX or Matthews pairing up with either DeAngelo or Mendenhall. Not a bad outcome, here.

Assuming the top 5 spots go to RBs...it may be impossible for them to go RB with their second picks; especially with attractive WRs available like Roddy, Austin, CJ and Marshall.

I remember back in the day when WR/WR was an alternative drafting at 11th or 12th. The idea was that you would lock up the league's top 2 WRs thus diminishing everyone else's returns at WR. Not sure how often it is used now, especially with Moss and Andre going so early in the round.

Another antiquated strategy was RB/RB/RB. No chance that ever happens again with the way RBs split carries these days. It was a solid strategy 5-6 years ago...

I wouldn't completely throw out RB/RB/RB. I've had a couple mocks open up with Turner/Gore, Benson, Thomas/Grant. It's really hard to turn that down, even if just for trade value. If I don't like the WR value in the 2nd/3rd, I'm seriously looking at that route.

On the WR/WR in the 12 spot, a buddy did that 2 or 3 years ago with Moss/TO then turned around and went RB/RB in 3/4 round. Ended up winning the league.

[dj_stouty]

I wouldn't completely throw out RB/RB/RB. I've had a couple mocks open up with Turner/Gore, Benson, Thomas/Grant. It's really hard to turn that down, even if just for trade value. If I don't like the WR value in the 2nd/3rd, I'm seriously looking at that route.

On the WR/WR in the 12 spot, a buddy did that 2 or 3 years ago with Moss/TO then turned around and went RB/RB in 3/4 round. Ended up winning the league.

If your league is trade-happy, then I'd consider that RB/RB/RB hypothetical. Trades don't seem to happen very often in my leagues and I'd be nervous that I'd have no takers. I'd hate to have my 3rd rounder sitting pine for many games...

This season, WR/WR is only manageable if you can get AJ and Moss...and that is all but impossible unless andre falls to 7th or 8th...and Moss manages to slip to early 2nd round. I guess that is possible if your league is QB happy and Brees, Manning and Rodgers go early.

Watching Mike & Mike this morning and ESPN's FF advisor is downgrading Reggie Wayne (diminishing stats over past 3 years) and Fitzgerald (no good QBs in ARI). I'm starting to agree with this...and I'm hoping other owners take them too high in the early 2nd allowing better options to fall to me.

[ihatedallas]

I was offered Santonio for S. Rice the other day, and Im starting to consider the offer. Rice has more potential but both are going to be missing a large chunk of the FF season. Any advice?


I also have a pretty stacked lineup in another league when it comes to WR/RBs. I have MJD/Greene/Marshall/Boldin/Wells. Ive been considering trading wells straight up for S. Smith from the NYG. I traditionally cater towards running backs, and Wells had a strong second half as well as a diminished passing game. Smith has become the go to receiver in an increasingly uptempo offense in NY. Thoughts?

[fent]

I was offered Santonio for S. Rice the other day, and Im starting to consider the offer. Rice has more potential but both are going to be missing a large chunk of the FF season. Any advice?


I also have a pretty stacked lineup in another league when it comes to WR/RBs. I have MJD/Greene/Marshall/Boldin/Wells. Ive been considering trading wells straight up for S. Smith from the NYG. I traditionally cater towards running backs, and Wells had a strong second half as well as a diminished passing game. Smith has become the go to receiver in an increasingly uptempo offense in NY. Thoughts?

Rice is out for much longer and is out with an injury meaning once he's even ready to start playing again, he's going to have to get used to going full speed...I'd stick with Santonio.

On Wells for Smith, depends on the scoring of the league. I would tend toward Wells simply because I value RBs over WRs.

[RedskinsDave]

Yeah, no way you trade a viable player for Rice even if Santonio will be suspended some. Being injured is much worse because no one knows how Rice will be once he's back.

[ihatedallas]

Yeah, no way you trade a viable player for Rice even if Santonio will be suspended some. Being injured is much worse because no one knows how Rice will be once he's back.

Rice having surgery 2 days after my draft was a pretty big let down. I chose to accept the Rice for Holmes swap. If Rice really is going to be out for 8 weeks, that leaves only about 6 TOTAL weeks of fantasy play.

[fent]

Rice having surgery 2 days after my draft was a pretty big let down. I chose to accept the Rice for Holmes swap. If Rice really is going to be out for 8 weeks, that leaves only about 6 TOTAL weeks of fantasy play.

So you were giving up Rice? In that case, good move.

[RedskinsDave]

Agree with Fent, if you're sending Rice then make the move.

This is why my league drafts the week of the first game.

[dj_stouty]

With the potential of LJ and Fast Willie being cut you have to assume Portis' fantasy value will increase. I've seen Portis fall to the 7th or 8th round (in 10-owner leagues) in almost every mock I've participated in. I have a hard time believing there are 20-25 better fantasy RBs than Portis, yet the FF world views him as worse for some reason...

[dj_stouty]

Here are the results of my 10-owner mock from last night. I picked 10th and lucked out to have Gore fall to me. I immedately tested out the RB/RB theory and found very few quality receivers by the time my 40th and 41st picks came up.

Again- Portis slipped to 9th round. He is so under-valued by the FF world, its not funny...

1. Frank Gore (SF - RB)
2. Ryan Mathews (SD - RB)
3. Tony Romo (Dal - QB)
4. Steve Smith (Car - WR)
5. Hines Ward (Pit - WR)
6. Michael Crabtree (SF - WR)
7. Jason Witten (Dal - TE)
8. Arian Foster (Hou - RB)
9. Clinton Portis (Was - RB)
10. Derrick Mason (Bal - WR)
11. Santonio Holmes (NYJ - WR)
12. Matt Ryan (Atl - QB)
13. San Diego (SD - DEF)
14. Josh Scobee (Jac - K)
15. Darren Sproles (SD - RB)

[fent]

Good looking team DJ. Nice work grabbing Foster that late. I think I'm going to be targetting him in the 4th in my 12-teamer. He was insane last night.

[Keino]

In 12 team leagues, I used to be a big RB/RB proponent. The problem has become the number of teams with uncertainty at the position. It used to be that there were 10-12 guys who were, bar none, the #1 guy toting the rock for their team. The league has moved toward 2 headed and 3 headed monster backfields that I have found has increased the value of the QB and Upper tiered WR positions.

As DJ discovered in his draft, going RB/RB leaves some slim pickins at WR with all of the your big time producers off the board. Guys like Grant aren't going in the 2nd round. I would say skin4ever, don't reach for a RB in round 2 because you are set on a RB RB strategy. There is going to be RB value in the later rounds. Where you are picking in the draft is also key in establishing your strategy going into the draft and adjusting it during the draft. If you are on the back-end of the draft (10, 11 & 12 spots) you will have a chance to get an upper tiered QB/WR on that turn pick in round 2. Either way, it will be a long time until you make your 3rd round pick....so you need to be mindful of this. Which leads me to staying ahead of the trends. There is nothing worse than watching a run on a position while you haven't addressed that position.

In a competitive 12 team league I am in, I picked from the 12 spot. I went with Manning in round 2, completely bucking the trend in the draft (and my usual deal of waiting on QB). I was still able to get Beanie Wells in the 4th and Ronnie Brown in the 6th and Tim Hightower in the 10th (Wells Handcuff), so I have RB2 options to go with Steven Jackson and I have the best QB in the league....My point is that you don't have to necessarily go RB-RB in order to have a viable fantasy backfield.

[fent]

In 12 team leagues, I used to be a big RB/RB proponent. The problem has become the number of teams with uncertainty at the position. It used to be that there were 10-12 guys who were, bar none, the #1 guy toting the rock for their team. The league has moved toward 2 headed and 3 headed monster backfields that I have found has increased the value of the QB and Upper tiered WR positions.

As DJ discovered in his draft, going RB/RB leaves some slim pickins at WR with all of the your big time producers off the board. Guys like Grant aren't going in the 2nd round. I would say skin4ever, don't reach for a RB in round 2 because you are set on a RB RB strategy. There is going to be RB value in the later rounds. Where you are picking in the draft is also key in establishing your strategy going into the draft and adjusting it during the draft. If you are on the back-end of the draft (10, 11 & 12 spots) you will have a chance to get an upper tiered QB/WR on that turn pick in round 2. Either way, it will be a long time until you make your 3rd round pick....so you need to be mindful of this. Which leads me to staying ahead of the trends. There is nothing worse than watching a run on a position while you haven't addressed that position.

In a competitive 12 team league I am in, I picked from the 12 spot. I went with Manning in round 2, completely bucking the trend in the draft (and my usual deal of waiting on QB). I was still able to get Beanie Wells in the 4th and Ronnie Brown in the 6th and Tim Hightower in the 10th (Wells Handcuff), so I have RB2 options to go with Steven Jackson and I have the best QB in the league....My point is that you don't have to necessarily go RB-RB in order to have a viable fantasy backfield.

Agreed with everything here other than the comment on Grant. He's been going in the top half of the 2nd in all my mocks and his ADP is 17.

On stuff we do agree on, outside the top 5 or 6, there are no sure things at RB. I'm giving serious consideration to Andre at 6, Miles Austin/Calvin Johnson/Roddy White in the 2nd, Pierre Thomas in the 3rd, and someone like Arian Foster in the 4th to get me started. In fact, that's the next mock strategy to be employed just to see how I like what I end up with.

[Keino]

In every Draft I have participated in this month, the earliest Grant went was 2.11. My point was mostly if the choice is between Randy Moss and Grant, value based drafting says that Moss is the pick.....To be fair, he hasn't gone lower than 3.3 either.

[fent]

In every Draft I have participated in this month, the earliest Grant went was 2.11. My point was mostly if the choice is between Randy Moss and Grant, value based drafting says that Moss is the pick.....To be fair, he hasn't gone lower than 3.3 either.

Oh definitely. That's why I wanted nothing to do with the back end of this year's drafts. RB in the 1st is so ingrained in my head that I didn't want to be down to the last second convincing myself to go with someone else. Thus the reason that even after my little experiment tonight, I'm probably going with whichver is left of Turner/Gore in the first when I actually draft Wednesday night.

[fent]

Well, I ended up with the following out of the 6 hole in a 12 teamer. Obviously I need an upgrade at the TE spot, but a couple moves are in the works. I grabbed Aromashodu while Miller and Shiancoe were both still on the board and everyone else had a TE, so I figured at least one of them would get around to me...turns out I figured wrong.

Eli
Gore, Arian Foster, Bradshaw, Barber, Cadillac, Dixon (someone drafted Westbrook in the 9th, thus the lack of legit handcuff to Gore)
Austin, Roddy White, Ward, Aromashodu, Rice (IR)
Gresham (Literally no one was left, so I took a chance on some upside)
Prater
Ravens

[fent]

Anybody here actually worried about MJD this season? The guy with him in my league hates him and wants to talk deals. I haven't even looked at him because I didn't have a shot at him in any of my drafts.

[RedskinsDave]

Anybody here actually worried about MJD this season? The guy with him in my league hates him and wants to talk deals. I haven't even looked at him because I didn't have a shot at him in any of my drafts.

I have concerns. I am drafting 4th and he may be an option. Most mocks I have seen have MJD, Turner or Ray Rice going 4th but I have issues with all of them. I may just go Rodgers and worry about RB later.

[CarMike]

Anybody here actually worried about MJD this season? The guy with him in my league hates him and wants to talk deals. I haven't even looked at him because I didn't have a shot at him in any of my drafts.

I have concerns. I am drafting 4th and he may be an option. Most mocks I have seen have MJD, Turner or Ray Rice going 4th but I have issues with all of them. I may just go Rodgers and worry about RB later.

I hope he has a great season. I picked him in my $$$ league. I like the fact that he doesn't really share the backfield equally. Then again, I could be wrong since I don't watch Jacksonville. Plus, this is the first time ever I've had him on my fantasy team.

[dj_stouty]

I'm picking 3rd in my 12-owner draft tonight, and baring a Johnson or ADP drop, I'm gunning straight for MJD. Apparently the knee is fine and the fantasy world is getting scared for no reason.

His stock has taken a hit lately, so now is the time to buy him at lower cost.

[Skinz4lyfe]

I'm hoping he does well too. I have him in 2 leagues. In 1 league I drafted him #9 overall (PPR league w/big bonuses for QBs) and another drafted him 3rd. He's been relatively healthy to this point in his career so I'm banking on that.

[RedskinsDave]

I'm picking 3rd in my 12-owner draft tonight, and baring a Johnson or ADP drop, I'm gunning straight for MJD. Apparently the knee is fine and the fantasy world is getting scared for no reason.

His stock has taken a hit lately, so now is the time to buy him at lower cost.

I picked 4th in a ten team league. Here is my team:

Rivers, E. Manning
MJD, Mendenhall, A. Bradshaw, Forsett
Jennings, Ward, Nicks, Massaquoi, Williams (TB), Laurent Robinson
Finley, Winslow
Akers, Rackers
Bears, Colts

My scoring is TD's and bonuses at 100 for WR and RB and 250 for QB's. That's why I target #1s when there are possibly higher rated 3's left at WR. I think I am solid as I have true #1's at each position.

[guess88]

MJD is a solid pick as he almost always puts up big numbers, but doesn't really get the fanfare outside of fantasy circles. I think Rice will go nuts in fantasy this year... soo many weapons to choose from in Bmore. Soo many WRs....

[ihatedallas]

My WR position in one league has slowly been falling apart lately.

Im scrambling to get a 3rd receiver in behind Ochocinco and Marshall
Would you start Collie vs. Houston or Meachum vs. Minnesota? My gut says Meachum because I think he is more of a TD threat and NO will be forced to throw the ball against Minny.




I have another league that is plagued with bad matchups, which is annoying for week 1 - because I like to usually start my drafted starters.

I have 1 rb/1 wr/ 1 flex Im up in the air with and Im choosing between Greene/Wells/Knox/Boldin/Crabtree.

I think Knox will have a good first week against Detroit, and I'm concerned about Greene vs Balt and Boldin vs Revis. At the moment I have Wells, Knox, and Boldin in....thoughts?

[dj_stouty]

I picked 4th in a ten team league. Here is my team:

Rivers, E. Manning
MJD, Mendenhall, A. Bradshaw, Forsett
Jennings, Ward, Nicks, Massaquoi, Williams (TB), Laurent Robinson
Finley, Winslow
Akers, Rackers
Bears, Colts

My scoring is TD's and bonuses at 100 for WR and RB and 250 for QB's. That's why I target #1s when there are possibly higher rated 3's left at WR. I think I am solid as I have true #1's at each position.

Very solid squad. MJD/Mendenhall is great tandem. Couple that with Rives/Jennings/Finley and you have some stacked starters.

I did my 12-owner last night from #3. LUCKILY, Brees was taken 1st overall...so I got ADP to drop to third. Starters in Bold.

Cutler, Big Ben
ADP, Ryan Matthews, Bradshaw, Cadillac
Miles Austin, S.Smith (NYG), Floyd, J. Jones, Royal
Gates, Keller
Crosby
Vikings, Dolphins

I'm actually considering starting the Phins over Vikings...as you have to believe NO will score points against MN and the Bills are....well, they are the Bills. lol

[dj_stouty]

My WR position in one league has slowly been falling apart lately.

Im scrambling to get a 3rd receiver in behind Ochocinco and Marshall
Would you start Collie vs. Houston or Meachum vs. Minnesota? My gut says Meachum because I think he is more of a TD threat and NO will be forced to throw the ball against Minny.

Meachum. Brees spreads the ball around and I have a feeling they will put up huge numbers against MN.


I have another league that is plagued with bad matchups, which is annoying for week 1 - because I like to usually start my drafted starters.

I have 1 rb/1 wr/ 1 flex Im up in the air with and Im choosing between Greene/Wells/Knox/Boldin/Crabtree.

I think Knox will have a good first week against Detroit, and I'm concerned about Greene vs Balt and Boldin vs Revis. At the moment I have Wells, Knox, and Boldin in....thoughts?

Revis didnt' allow a single receiver more than 50 yards last season. Put a big X through Boldin as he will be useless.

Gotta go with Wells, as STL's rush defense is pitiful. I'm not sold on Knox, so I'd stick with Greene. Try Wells, Greene and Crabtree.

[RedskinsDave]

Very solid squad. MJD/Mendenhall is great tandem. Couple that with Rives/Jennings/Finley and you have some stacked starters.

I did my 12-owner last night from #3. LUCKILY, Brees was taken 1st overall...so I got ADP to drop to third. Starters in Bold.

Cutler, Big Ben
ADP, Ryan Matthews, Bradshaw, Cadillac
Miles Austin, S.Smith (NYG), Floyd, J. Jones, Royal
Gates, Keller
Crosby
Vikings, Dolphins

I'm actually considering starting the Phins over Vikings...as you have to believe NO will score points against MN and the Bills are....well, they are the Bills. lol

That is a nice draft if it were only ten teams.

[dj_stouty]

That is a nice draft if it were only ten teams.

I think so too. I'm very happy with the results.

My league is very QB happy...and while QBs get good points for TDs they dont get as many points for yardage (at least in our scoring), so while they were hammering on Schaub and Romo I was taking RB value for Matthews and getting Gates as my luxury TE pick.

[Keino]

I have concerns. I am drafting 4th and he may be an option. Most mocks I have seen have MJD, Turner or Ray Rice going 4th but I have issues with all of them. I may just go Rodgers and worry about RB later.

Honestly, if I had the 4th pick I'd probably take Rice....especially in a ppr league. The guy gets it done in both phases of the game.

[justinskins]

Should I start Austin Collie (@ Hou) or Jeremy Maclin (vs. GB)?

[dj_stouty]

Should I start Austin Collie (@ Hou) or Jeremy Maclin (vs. GB)?


Maclin - at least he is the 2nd or 3rd option on his team. Collie has Wayne, Garcon, Gonzalez and Dallas Clark all getting the ball much more than he will.

[Keino]

Maclin - at least he is the 2nd or 3rd option on his team. Collie has Wayne, Garcon, Gonzalez and Dallas Clark all getting the ball much more than he will.

Yep. Collie's value will only increase with an injury to Gonzo or Garcon.

[RedskinsDave]

Honestly, if I had the 4th pick I'd probably take Rice....especially in a ppr league. The guy gets it done in both phases of the game.

Rice went 3rd and then Rodgers went 5th. I guess that team had the same thinking I did or they had drop off after MJD. I know I did.

[Santheb]

I've got a question that a lot of people have had differing opinions on.

Should I start..

Matt Schaub vs Indy

or

Jay Cutler vs Detroit

I'm thinking Cutler vs Detroit because of Mike Martz being there and Detroit not having a great secondary by any means, but Schaub is pretty good..

[dj_stouty]

I've got a question that a lot of people have had differing opinions on.

Should I start..

Matt Schaub vs Indy

or

Jay Cutler vs Detroit

I'm thinking Cutler vs Detroit because of Mike Martz being there and Detroit not having a great secondary by any means, but Schaub is pretty good..

Cutler should be considered a top 5 QB this week against a weak defense and you have to think Martz will get Cutler spreading the ball around a lot.

That being said; Schaub is a top 5 QB overall, and you never bench those guys during the season. Go with Matt...

[RedskinsDave]

Flip a coin on that one. I think they are as even as can be unless you lose more than a point for INT's. That's why I would favor Schaub.

[Keino]

For me that would not be a hard choice. Schaub all the way and don't look back.

I wouldn't let the Detroit match-up play into my thinking at all. That team has improved itself, especially of the defensive side of the ball and it is a divisional game (as is Houston/Indy). Cutler is a turnover machine and I would not think at all about starting him over Schaub. Cutler has to prove that he is starter quality for Fantasy. Until he does, to me, he is a back-up. Capable of the 300 yard / 3 TD day for sure, but he is as inconsistent as they come. In FF, slow and steady win the race.

[CarMike]

Need help choosing between RBs:

DeAngelo Williams -vs- New York Giants

or

Arian Foster -vs- Indianapolis Colts

Stewart always concerns me taking carries away from Williams. However, it hardly ever keeps Williams #s down.

Foster is an unknown RB who won the starting job in Houston. But they like to throw the ball more than run.

Foster projects more points but we all know how much means in FF.

Thoughts?

One more while here:

CJ Spiller -vs- Miami

or

Clinton Portis -vs- dallass

[fent]

Need help choosing between RBs:

DeAngelo Williams -vs- New York Giants

or

Arian Foster -vs- Indianapolis Colts

Stewart always concerns me taking carries away from Williams. However, it hardly ever keeps Williams #s down.

Foster is an unknown RB who won the starting job in Houston. But they like to throw the ball more than run.

Foster projects more points but we all know how much means in FF.

Thoughts?

One more while here:

CJ Spiller -vs- Miami

or

Clinton Portis -vs- dallass

I'd go with Deangelo over Foster and Portis over Spiller. I love Foster, but it's awfully hard to start him over Williams.

While I'm here...Portis vs. Dallas or Shonn Greene vs. Ravens?

[CarMike]

I'd go with Deangelo over Foster and Portis over Spiller. I love Foster, but it's awfully hard to start him over Williams.

While I'm here...Portis vs. Dallas or Shonn Greene vs. Ravens?

Definitely Portis over Green IMO.

Ravens run defense has been tough over the years. Should be pretty good once again.

Thanks fent for your input.

[RedskinsDave]

I like Williams over Foster and Spiller over Portis.

[guess88]

Portis and Foster all the way

[RedskinsDave]

I like Williams over Foster and Spiller over Portis.

Portis and Foster all the way

Ha, we get to see who got this one right.

[RedskinsDave]

Ha, we get to see who got this one right.

I was dead wrong before Portis even goes.

[CarMike]

I sat Foster in the league I was asking about. lol

But I did have him playing in my $$$ league. However, the other guy also had Nicks starting. lol But I'm still comfortably in the lead. Plus I have 5 more players and he has 2 left.

[RedskinsDave]

I had Nicks on my bench but I started Massaquoi.

[CarMike]

I had Nicks on my bench but I started Massaquoi.

I probably would have done the same thing Dave. Panthers pass defense is usually a lot better than how they played today.

[ihatedallas]

Now I need some advice - What the hell was going on with the NYJ last night? Greene was a near non-factor. I would like ot think it is because of the fumble and the fact that LTs speed vs. Greene's power would be more effective against Baltimore - but if its not its quite a long term problem for me running back wise.

NY runs the ball a ton so touches will still be ample - but how do you guys see NY's running game shaking out? Should I bench him for Beanie or Ricky Williams this week? I know ricky's playing Minny, but I see him getting a lot of receiving work.

[dj_stouty]

Now I need some advice - What the hell was going on with the NYJ last night? Greene was a near non-factor. I would like ot think it is because of the fumble and the fact that LTs speed vs. Greene's power would be more effective against Baltimore - but if its not its quite a long term problem for me running back wise.

NY runs the ball a ton so touches will still be ample - but how do you guys see NY's running game shaking out? Should I bench him for Beanie or Ricky Williams this week? I know ricky's playing Minny, but I see him getting a lot of receiving work.

I'm not even sure if Beanie will be active this week. Assuming you used a first or second rounder on Greene, you are pretty much destined to see him through the first 2-3 weeks before labeling him a bust. As they say in poker, "You are pot committed".

[ihatedallas]

I'm not even sure if Beanie will be active this week. Assuming you used a first or second rounder on Greene, you are pretty much destined to see him through the first 2-3 weeks before labeling him a bust. As they say in poker, "You are pot committed".

Yea, I got him in the early third so I will most likely to continue to use him. I dont care about the lack of production - I was expecting so from Balt - but it seemed like LT was heavily favored, which is stressing me out a little bit.

[RedskinsDave]

While the fumbles are a concern, I would be very careful to judge any player against that Ravens defense. Except of course, Sanchez. He sucks.

[ihatedallas]

/thanks for the replies guys. I'm going with Greene untill Wells is healthy and playing in a decent matchup.


What do you guys think of the Bears D? I think they have a good chance of getting after Romo and forcing TO's, and after watching the boys special teams I think there is a serious threat of Manning or Hester returning one. I have the option of dropping it for the patriots, who are facing the Jets.

[fent]

Gresham is my TE. My RBs are Gore, Foster, Bradshaw, Barber, Cadillac. With Miles Austin, Roddy White, and Hines Ward as my top 3 receivers, not much chance that I'm ever playing more than 2 RBs. Got offered Shiancoe for Cadillac. About to pull the trigger. Any major flaws with that?

[ihatedallas]

Gresham is my TE. My RBs are Gore, Foster, Bradshaw, Barber, Cadillac. With Miles Austin, Roddy White, and Hines Ward as my top 3 receivers, not much chance that I'm ever playing more than 2 RBs. Got offered Shiancoe for Cadillac. About to pull the trigger. Any major flaws with that?

Nothing at all. Trading excess for need is the name of the game.

[RedskinsDave]

Gresham is my TE. My RBs are Gore, Foster, Bradshaw, Barber, Cadillac. With Miles Austin, Roddy White, and Hines Ward as my top 3 receivers, not much chance that I'm ever playing more than 2 RBs. Got offered Shiancoe for Cadillac. About to pull the trigger. Any major flaws with that?

None at all.

[RedskinsDave]

/thanks for the replies guys. I'm going with Greene untill Wells is healthy and playing in a decent matchup.


What do you guys think of the Bears D? I think they have a good chance of getting after Romo and forcing TO's, and after watching the boys special teams I think there is a serious threat of Manning or Hester returning one. I have the option of dropping it for the patriots, who are facing the Jets.

I have the Bears as my D because of their special teams and we don't get hammered for scoring. I have Chicago rated well ahead of the Pats.

[justinskins]

Should I drop one of my current receivers for one of the Rams' receivers? Clayton and Amendola are available as free agents in my league. Clayton had a big week but I'm wondering if he can repeat. My league is set for half a PPR so he could be a good addition if he consistently gets 10+ targets.

I'm thinking I'd drop Chris Chambers, although I'm a little reluctant since he could emerge as the #1 in KC. Then again, I'm not sure if it means anything to be the #1 receiver it KC. Also, Robert Meachem really didn't do much last week and I'm wondering if it's worth hanging onto him for long. Other than them I have Maclin, Harvin & Collie but I'm not interested in dropping any of them.

[CarMike]

I proposed this trade in a league I'm in. Let me preface with his team lineup:

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h191/CarMike24/trade.jpg

As you can see, he is stacked at the WR position but is hurting on at the RB spot.

So I offered Michael Turner and Michael Crabtree for Andre Johnson.

Good trade offer or bad trade offer? [from his perspective]

[fent]

I proposed this trade in a league I'm in. Let me preface with his team lineup:

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h191/CarMike24/trade.jpg

As you can see, he is stacked at the WR position but is hurting on at the RB spot.

So I offered Michael Turner and Michael Crabtree for Andre Johnson.

Good trade offer or bad trade offer? [from his perspective]

Good from his perspective. I think the trade is in his favor. At best, I think Turner and Andre are even, and based on ADP, I'm guessing you took Turner with Andre still on the board. I'd go Andre for Turner straight up, honestly.

[CarMike]

Good from his perspective. I think the trade is in his favor. At best, I think Turner and Andre are even, and based on ADP, I'm guessing you took Turner with Andre still on the board. I'd go Andre for Turner straight up, honestly.

I have some good WR's myself which is why I threw in Crabtree for the sweetener. :)

I don't mind him getting the better of the trade as long as I can get Johnson.

Thanks for the feedback fent.

[dj_stouty]

Should I drop one of my current receivers for one of the Rams' receivers? Clayton and Amendola are available as free agents in my league. Clayton had a big week but I'm wondering if he can repeat. My league is set for half a PPR so he could be a good addition if he consistently gets 10+ targets..

Yeah, I think Clayton had something like 17 targets last weekend which was in the top 3 for the league. Its all about opportunity for WRs...so I' definitely take a chance on him.

[RedskinsDave]

He should make that trade but it is never easy moving a solid number 1 even if you're getting one.

[CarMike]

He should make that trade but it is never easy moving a solid number 1 even if you're getting one.

That's why I threw in Crabs. Hope he takes it. I would if I needed a #1 RB.

[fent]

My pay league gives us 50 bid points to use all year on acquiring FAs. Even if I burn through them all, I can still pick guys up, I just have to hope no one bids any points on the guy. Haven't used any points yet....Brandon Jackson available. How much of that budget is he worth? I'm leaning toward about 20. He's not going to have any competition for carries, the Packers run a workhorse system, and the offense is retarded good. Thoughts?

[CarMike]

My pay league gives us 50 bid points to use all year on acquiring FAs. Even if I burn through them all, I can still pick guys up, I just have to hope no one bids any points on the guy. Haven't used any points yet....Brandon Jackson available. How much of that budget is he worth? I'm leaning toward about 20. He's not going to have any competition for carries, the Packers run a workhorse system, and the offense is retarded good. Thoughts?

Is Maroney available? 20 points sounds reasonable for Jackson. Unless they go out find another RB.

[fent]

Is Maroney available? 20 points sounds reasonable for Jackson. Unless they go out find another RB.

Maroney got drafted for some reason, so he's off the board.

[CarMike]

Maroney got drafted for some reason, so he's off the board.

that sucks. I tried to pick him up in a couple of my leagues and he was already on picked up as well.

Jackson could become a star fantasy league player year as long as they don't bring in another RB.

[ihatedallas]

My pay league gives us 50 bid points to use all year on acquiring FAs. Even if I burn through them all, I can still pick guys up, I just have to hope no one bids any points on the guy. Haven't used any points yet....Brandon Jackson available. How much of that budget is he worth? I'm leaning toward about 20. He's not going to have any competition for carries, the Packers run a workhorse system, and the offense is retarded good. Thoughts?

I'd say anywhere from 20-30. He has the potential to be a top 15 fantasy back now, because as you said there is zero competition. The Pack also have stints where they are surprisingly committed to running.

[ihatedallas]

A couple other questions that Im hoping to get feeback on.

Im in a standard 2rb-3wr league. I have MJD-Charles-Portis-Bush-BJackson at RB and Marshall-ochocinco-meachum-Housh for wr.

I have been offered nicks straight up for Charles..which Im not in favor of at the moment. Obviously without flex, I have no need for all of these running backs - so should i be considering Charles-nicks? I want to make sure I'm not overly committing to an early pick.


Also in another league I'm kind of at a toss up Cutler or Vick? Detroit should be in for a rout but I think the bears wont be able to run and Cutler could get up and over 300 yds again.

[fent]

A couple other questions that Im hoping to get feeback on.

Im in a standard 2rb-3wr league. I have MJD-Charles-Portis-Bush-BJackson at RB and Marshall-ochocinco-meachum-Housh for wr.

I have been offered nicks straight up for Charles..which Im not in favor of at the moment. Obviously without flex, I have no need for all of these running backs - so should i be considering Charles-nicks? I want to make sure I'm not overly committing to an early pick.


Also in another league I'm kind of at a toss up Cutler or Vick? Detroit should be in for a rout but I think the bears wont be able to run and Cutler could get up and over 300 yds again.

I'd lean toward Vick, because of his abilities to add yards on the ground against an awful defense.

If he has a better WR, I'd try to go after him for Charles. I love Nicks, but do you see him putting up 3 TDs a week? I'd rather have the consistency of a guy like Charles, who also gives you the chance of a big play every time he touches the ball.

[justinskins]

Yeah, I think Clayton had something like 17 targets last weekend which was in the top 3 for the league. Its all about opportunity for WRs...so I' definitely take a chance on him.

I dropped Chambers to pick up Clayton. I also dropped Maroney to pick up Fred Taylor, I feel that was a good decision (although I dropped Maroney right before word came out that he'd been traded to Denver, oy vey!).

[justinskins]

One more question. Right now I have JC as my backup QB, should I drop him and pick up Hasselbeck?

[ihatedallas]

I'd lean toward Vick, because of his abilities to add yards on the ground against an awful defense.

If he has a better WR, I'd try to go after him for Charles. I love Nicks, but do you see him putting up 3 TDs a week? I'd rather have the consistency of a guy like Charles, who also gives you the chance of a big play every time he touches the ball.

I doubt Nicks will get up over 20 points again, but adding him to Ochocinco and Marshall would give me one of the best WR sets in the league. He has Calvin Johnson and Fitz. If he continues to reject my jackson/portis for nicks trades I'll probably move on and attempt a Charles for CJ line of action.

[ihatedallas]

One more question. Right now I have JC as my backup QB, should I drop him and pick up Hasselbeck?

I would. Hasselback has a weaker running game and better receivers.

[fent]

Last year someone posted a website of the relative matchups for each team's fantasy positions based on actual defensive stats of the team they played in a given week. I think it was DJ that posted it. I had it on my work computer which I no longer have access to. Anyone still have that link?

[dj_stouty]

Last year someone posted a website of the relative matchups for each team's fantasy positions based on actual defensive stats of the team they played in a given week. I think it was DJ that posted it. I had it on my work computer which I no longer have access to. Anyone still have that link?

I believe that was fftoday.com's strength of schedule document that is updated each week. I just went over to their site and don't see it listed...

I'll check back later. It really is a good tool to use, although not the most accurate early in the season.

[CarMike]

Nicks is listed as questionable for tonights game. Should I replace him or take a chance on him playing in tonights game?

[fent]

Nicks is listed as questionable for tonights game. Should I replace him or take a chance on him playing in tonights game?

Do you have any other options in the Sunday/Monday night matchups?


Also, I need to choose between A. Bradshaw and H. Ward for my flex spot (and I guess Aromashodu, but I don't see how I can start him over either of those guys this week). Got Ward in there now. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other on that choice?

[CarMike]

Do you have any other options in the Sunday/Monday night matchups?


Also, I need to choose between A. Bradshaw and H. Ward for my flex spot (and I guess Aromashodu, but I don't see how I can start him over either of those guys this week). Got Ward in there now. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other on that choice?

No, all other WRs play today.

I think I'd go with Bradshaw against the Colts. If Foster could torch the Colts defense the way he did last week, and with Dixon starting at QB for the Steelers, I'd go with AB. :whoknows: lol

[fent]

No, all other WRs play today.

That's a tough call, then. Who would go in for him? He's only questionable and he traveled with the team, so I'd probably pull the trigger, but if you have someone comparable, then it's probably worth it to sit him.

[CarMike]

In one league, I have TO / Sims-Walker / Jeremy Maclin

And in another league, I have Jeremy Maclin / Steve Breaston / McCluster

Thanks fent

[fent]

In one league, I have TO / Sims-Walker / Jeremy Maclin

And in another league, I have Jeremy Maclin / Steve Breaston / McCluster

Thanks fent

Maclin in his place might be worth it, but my gut says he plays.

[CarMike]

Maclin in his place might be worth it, but my gut says he plays.

Yeah, I think I'm staying with Nicks. Watch him kill me. lol

[CarMike]

On another note, I'm rolling the dice.

Sitting R. Moss vs Reavis

Starting

Bernard Berrian against the Dolphins. Thoughts?

[ihatedallas]

I just completed a trade - Beanie/Crabtree for Ronnie Brown

I already have, Ricky Williams - so i'll essentially have 100% of the Miami rushing attack.

The rest of my starters are MJD/Greene/Boldin/Marshall. I have plenty of WR options that are producing for right now, so Crabtree as a backup/flex option was an expendable trade chip - with a big name.

I need a steady running back untill/if Greene starts producing or falls into some matchups, so I moved Mr. Glass.

Thoughts?

[ihatedallas]

On another note, I'm rolling the dice.

Sitting R. Moss vs Reavis

Starting

Bernard Berrian against the Dolphins. Thoughts?

uh-oh. hopefully the rest of your guys played well.

[RedskinsDave]

I just completed a trade - Beanie/Crabtree for Ronnie Brown

I already have, Ricky Williams - so i'll essentially have 100% of the Miami rushing attack.

The rest of my starters are MJD/Greene/Boldin/Marshall. I have plenty of WR options that are producing for right now, so Crabtree as a backup/flex option was an expendable trade chip - with a big name.

I need a steady running back untill/if Greene starts producing or falls into some matchups, so I moved Mr. Glass.

Thoughts?

Brown and Wells straight up would have been nearly even. You gave up too much throwing in Crabtree IMO.

[ihatedallas]

Brown and Wells straight up would have been nearly even. You gave up too much throwing in Crabtree IMO.


Yea, I know. Crabtree is 4/5th down the rung right now in my WR depth, so I sacrificed him in order to get a deal done. I was in a tough spot because Greene is getting beat by LT at the moment and Wells hasn't hit the field. I'm 0-2 and my running back spot has been incredibly weak. I wanted to make a move before Crabtree has another sub 5 point week/ Wells misses more time because their value will continue to decrease.



On a separate note is anyone else having trouble with TD production right now? It might just be my team but my studs are refusing to find pay dirt right now. MJD/Boldin/Marshall have yielded me a total of around 30/35 points in 2 weeks.

[RedskinsDave]

I think touchdowns have been tough to come by for everyone.

[ihatedallas]

I guess I'm giving advice instead of asking for it- but if you're someone like me who plays their D week to week(I started the Bears then the Chiefs) then now is a good time to pick up the Bengals. They play Carolina, Cleveland, and Tampa consecutively.

[ihatedallas]

I have Vick and Cutler now, how are you guys valuing Vick? I'm in sell high mode with him, trying to get a deal done before he comes down to earth.

[RedskinsDave]

I'd hold for now. Vick may be a decent fantasy option and since you have Cutler, clearly INTs aren't an issue in your scoring.

[dj_stouty]

I'd hold for now. Vick may be a decent fantasy option and since you have Cutler, clearly INTs aren't an issue in your scoring.

Cutler has 5 TDs to 1 INT so far. I think he will do much better this year under Martz. I picked him up in the later rounds of 2 of my leagues...and I'm loving life for it!

[ihatedallas]

Cutler has 5 TDs to 1 INT so far. I think he will do much better this year under Martz. I picked him up in the later rounds of 2 of my leagues...and I'm loving life for it!

As am I. I don't think the Bears oline is capable of run blocking either, so Martz is loving life.

Dave - Ints are -2 while td's are still 6 for QB's. Not to mention I get a point for every 25 yards passing. So if Cutler continues to throw for well over 250 yards and at least a few td's, the ints don't hurt at all. They share the same bye week as well...

[RedskinsDave]

Since you have to move him, get what you can. His value may go up this weekend but I am expecting a crash down to earth.

[ihatedallas]

Less of a serious issue, but I'll still poke around for feedback. Knox vs GB or Schonn Greene vs Miami?

[dj_stouty]

Less of a serious issue, but I'll still poke around for feedback. Knox vs GB or Schonn Greene vs Miami?

Ugh. Not the best choices there. Greene was benched for fumbling and LT has lit it up ever since. Knox is only getting 3-4 catches a game.

I guess I'd stay away from Knox this week. He faces a GB defense that only allows 116 yards per game. I'm sure Cutler will out perform that...but probably not by much. My guess is he will spread the ball around (as usual) and everyone int he WR corp will have one of those 4 catch-45 yard days.

Go with Greene and hope he gets more carries...

[RedskinsDave]

Less of a serious issue, but I'll still poke around for feedback. Knox vs GB or Schonn Greene vs Miami?

I like Knox because I think the Bears will be playing catch-up most of the game.

[ihatedallas]

Both play after the 4 oclock games on Sunday, so I'll be able to play it by ear. I'm thinking Knox is a safer bet for 5+, while Greene has the higher ceiling. Dave, you're right about Knox, that's one of the reasons I'm even considering it. It is supposed to rain in Miami so i'm hoping that the Jets will grind it out in the trenches and Greene might be able to find the end zone.

[CarMike]

Check out this trade I'm trying to pull off. lmao

I'm sending MJD and Joseph Addai for Adrian Peterson.

And I think I may actually get it. This guy has NO ONE on the bench for a replacement RB for Bush. Actually, his replacement is Beanie Wells.

On his bench right now he has Bush, 4 WRs , and 1 QB.

I'm hoping to pair Peterson up with Foster. With Bradshaw as the fillin.

Thoughts?

[RedskinsDave]

If you can pull that off, good for you. It makes sense for both of you since he needs depth.

[skins4life24]

I have to pick 3 out of these 4 to start this week;

Ray Rice
Jamal Charles
Darren McFadden
Clinton Portis

I feel like I have to start Rice, other than that they all have favorable match-ups. Little help!?

[dj_stouty]

I have to pick 3 out of these 4 to start this week;

Ray Rice
Jamal Charles
Darren McFadden
Clinton Portis

I feel like I have to start Rice, other than that they all have favorable match-ups. Little help!?

Until Portis better his current 3ypc average, I'd go with the other three. With McNabb here...this club is no longer a grinder on the ground. Times have changed...

[CarMike]

If you can pull that off, good for you. It makes sense for both of you since he needs depth.

I haven't heard anything back from him yet. So it looks like I may not get Peterson before kickoff since it takes two days to clear for a trade. And the Vikes have Detroit this weekend. :banghead:

The guy is also 0-2 that I'm trying to trade with.

[CarMike]

I have to pick 3 out of these 4 to start this week;

Ray Rice
Jamal Charles
Darren McFadden
Clinton Portis

I feel like I have to start Rice, other than that they all have favorable match-ups. Little help!?

Hope this helps. I looked up all 4 opponents for each RB you listed. Here's what I found:

Darren McFadden -vs- Arizona Rush Defense:

ARD gives up 153 yards per game on the ground

31st Ranked Rush Defense

C. Portis -vs- St. Louis Rush Defense;

STRD gives up 142 yards per game on the ground

30th Ranked Rush Defense

Ray Rice -vs- Cleveland Rush Defense

CRD gives up 130 yards per game on the ground

25th Ranked Rush Defense

Jamaal Charles -vs- San Francisco Rush Defense

SFRD gives up 64 yards per game on the ground

Tied 6th Ranked Rush Defense [Dallas]

In all reality, stats mean very little when all it takes is one big run being the determining factor between a good week or a bad week from a RB.

[Chief Seeway]

Marcedes Lewis v Eagles

or

Brent Celek v Jag's

[RedSkinBrit]

Celek, he is due to find his 2009 form and i am starting him in 2 of my leagues.The Jags are there for the taking.

[CarMike]

If you can pull that off, good for you. It makes sense for both of you since he needs depth.

Apparently he didn't agree Dave. I got a pretty "snarky" response over the weekend. lol He sent me a counter offer of:

I get: Beanie Wells and Kenny Britt

He gets: Arian Foster and Desean Jackson

I told him to F off and it was his best friend who suggested I make the deal.

I think this is my last year in this league. They're all friends and I'm the one outsider. [They all go back to high school and I used to work with a friend inside the group] When I first signed up with this league there was no waiver wire. You could pick up a player any time any day. But once the commish started racing motorcycles on Sundays, he decided to make a one day waiver wire so he didn't miss out on anyone he wanted.

I'm tired of giving my $$$ away too. lol

[ihatedallas]

Ben Jarvis Green Ellis vs Miami or Schonn Greene vs Buffalo for flex?


Im pretty sure Fred Taylor will miss this week so BJGE will get a good portion of rb touches, but the "buffalo rule" is making me want to roll the dice on Greene finally putting up some numbers.

[justinskins]

Ben Jarvis Green Ellis vs Miami or Schonn Greene vs Buffalo for flex?


Im pretty sure Fred Taylor will miss this week so BJGE will get a good portion of rb touches, but the "buffalo rule" is making me want to roll the dice on Greene finally putting up some numbers.

I'm in a somewhat similar situation, except with my starting RBs instead of my flex spot (Ray Rice and Steven Jackson are my starters... :devil2:). I picked up Green-Ellis and also John Kuhn since he was available. The Pack is playing Detroit and I figure that's about as good as Buffalo. Brandon Jackson has disappointed and Green Bay will be out for blood after losing to the Cubs.

All that being said, I like Green-Ellis best for the reasons you've mentioned. I think Green-Ellis could have a nice week against Miami, and I think the Pats will play him with Fred Taylor injured and after his performance last week. It's hard to tell what the Jets will do and LT has been solid, so I don't really like Greene; but it's hard to argue against the Buffalo rule.

[RedskinsDave]

Ben Jarvis Green Ellis vs Miami or Schonn Greene vs Buffalo for flex?


Im pretty sure Fred Taylor will miss this week so BJGE will get a good portion of rb touches, but the "buffalo rule" is making me want to roll the dice on Greene finally putting up some numbers.

I'd go Greene just because she should get more touches.

[RedHokieSkin]

Rice vs. Steelers OR Addai vs. Jags

Who should I start this week?

[skins4life24]

Darren McFadden for either Brandon Marshall or Andre Johnson;

Who would you make the trade and who would you choose?

[hockeygoalie29]

Darren McFadden for either Brandon Marshall or Andre Johnson;

Who would you make the trade and who would you choose?

Really? Somebody offered you your choice of those receivers for McFadden? Take Johnson and take him now before this trade offer is pulled.

[RedskinsDave]

Darren McFadden for either Brandon Marshall or Andre Johnson;

Who would you make the trade and who would you choose?

You can get AJ for Run-Dmc? I know he's injured but that isn't even close. Wait out AJ's injury for a move like that. DMC was a waiver wire guy two weeks ago.

[guess88]

Tough trade offer proposed.

Guy's trading me Arian Foster and Braylon Edwards for Chris Johnson and Bernard Scott. CJ will eventually rip it, but Arian Foster has shown no signs of slowing down and I need more depth at receiver.

Current receivers are Greg Jennings, Wes Welker, Santana Moss, Malcom Floyd, and am holding onto V Jax hoping he comes back week 7).

Current RB's are Chris Johnson, Cedric Benson, Clinton Portis, Michael Bush, Jerome Harrison, and Bernard Scott.

3 WR league with W/R flex

Should I accept?

[RedskinsDave]

Tough trade offer proposed.

Guy's trading me Arian Foster and Braylon Edwards for Chris Johnson and Bernard Scott. CJ will eventually rip it, but Arian Foster has shown no signs of slowing down and I need more depth at receiver.

Current receivers are Greg Jennings, Wes Welker, Santana Moss, Malcom Floyd, and am holding onto V Jax hoping he comes back week 7).

Current RB's are Chris Johnson, Cedric Benson, Clinton Portis, Michael Bush, Jerome Harrison, and Bernard Scott.

3 WR league with W/R flex

Should I accept?

I wouldn't. Edwards isn't much better than the guys you have on the bench. Go pick up someone like Brandon Lloyd for depth and keep the best RB. I just checked a rankings service and your top 4 WR's are top 20 and Edwards isn't top 50 and will only go down once Santonio comes back.

[guess88]

I wouldn't. Edwards isn't much better than the guys you have on the bench. Go pick up someone like Brandon Lloyd for depth and keep the best RB. I just checked a rankings service and your top 4 WR's are top 20 and Edwards isn't top 50 and will only go down once Santonio comes back.

Lloyd's taken.

Edwards seems like he's coming up, though a lot of that depends on Sanchez's development, which seems promising. I figured that though Santonio is coming back that might actually be better for Edwards as it'll free him up more.

[RedskinsDave]

You're just not getting a good enough WR in return.

[fent]

I'd want a better WR back also. CJ and Peterson require a LOT to get right now. Even with Arian's hot start, I don't think that gets you CJ, much less CJ plus another player, as crappy as he is.

[ihatedallas]

Tough trade offer proposed.

Guy's trading me Arian Foster and Braylon Edwards for Chris Johnson and Bernard Scott. CJ will eventually rip it, but Arian Foster has shown no signs of slowing down and I need more depth at receiver.

Current receivers are Greg Jennings, Wes Welker, Santana Moss, Malcom Floyd, and am holding onto V Jax hoping he comes back week 7).

Current RB's are Chris Johnson, Cedric Benson, Clinton Portis, Michael Bush, Jerome Harrison, and Bernard Scott.

3 WR league with W/R flex

Should I accept?


I wouldn't. Like Dave said, why downgrade from Johnson to Foster just to pick up Edwards, who you might not even start? Is it more about Edwards or are you a bit enamored with Fosters huge numbers so far?

[ihatedallas]

Darren McFadden for either Brandon Marshall or Andre Johnson;

Who would you make the trade and who would you choose?

I would take AJ as quickly as possible.

[guess88]

I wouldn't. Like Dave said, why downgrade from Johnson to Foster just to pick up Edwards, who you might not even start? Is it more about Edwards or are you a bit enamored with Fosters huge numbers so far?

Foster's a bit of a spite pick as I wanted him and he got stolen from me in the 3rd round! But also because I'm weary on Santana Moss's fantasy value. He's been decent so far, but did nothing against the Eagles and am afraid they laid a blueprint to shut him down. He has Reggie Wayne, Randy Moss, DeSean Jackson, Steve Smith (NY), Mario Manningham, and Braylon.

[guess88]

Made a counter offer and got a verbal acceptance of the trade.

Chris Johnson and Jerome Harrison for Arian Foster and Randy Moss.

Hope this pans out... :)

[ihatedallas]

Made a counter offer and got a verbal acceptance of the trade.

Chris Johnson and Jerome Harrison for Arian Foster and Randy Moss.

Hope this pans out... :)

I like that a TON more than your last one. AF and Moss will out produce CJ + garbage.

[ihatedallas]

Cutlers hurt, stuck playing the waiver wire.

Hill vs STL or Kolb vs SF?

[RedskinsDave]

Made a counter offer and got a verbal acceptance of the trade.

Chris Johnson and Jerome Harrison for Arian Foster and Randy Moss.

Hope this pans out... :)

Now THAT makes more sense.

What would hold it up?

[ihatedallas]

Now THAT makes more sense.

What would hold it up?

The other guy realizing he's the loser?

[RedskinsDave]

Cutlers hurt, stuck playing the waiver wire.

Hill vs STL or Kolb vs SF?

Tough call but I like Hill better mainly because he's at home.

[ihatedallas]

Tough call but I like Hill better mainly because he's at home.

Yea, and I think Kolb is absolute garbage. It's the idea of Jackson/Maclin/McCoy that has me questioning it.

[RedskinsDave]

The other guy realizing he's the loser?

I don't think its that lopsided when one side needs an RB and the other a WR.

[dj_stouty]

My "plug-in player" of the week...

Looks like Cutler is (wisely) out next weekend due to concussion. Call me crazy, but I think a solid 1-week option is Ryan Fitzpatrick in Buffalo. The Harvard grad faces a Jacksonville team that is 30th against the pass, worst (by far) in allowing passing plays of 40+ yards, worst (by far) in highest average yards per catch allowed, and 3rd worst in QB passer rating against them. The Bills will be at home and the weather is expected to be great for the passing game. Also, MJD hasn't been practicing all week so he may not be able to pound the ball and sway ball possession. Fred Jackson and CJ Spiller are also great passing targets in the flat and either one could take one to the house in open field.

I see a safe 250 yards passing, 2TDs and 1INT in the air, and an extra 40 or so yards on the ground for good measure to get you around 20 FF points for him, depending on your scoring format.

Book it...

[RedskinsDave]

My "plug-in player" of the week...

Looks like Cutler is (wisely) out next weekend due to concussion. Call me crazy, but I think a solid 1-week option is Ryan Fitzpatrick in Buffalo. The Harvard grad faces a Jacksonville team that is 30th against the pass, worst (by far) in allowing passing plays of 40+ yards, worst (by far) in highest average yards per catch allowed, and 3rd worst in QB passer rating against them. The Bills will be at home and the weather is expected to be great for the passing game. Also, MJD hasn't been practicing all week so he may not be able to pound the ball and sway ball possession. Fred Jackson and CJ Spiller are also great passing targets in the flat and either one could take one to the house in open field.

I see a safe 250 yards passing, 2TDs and 1INT in the air, and an extra 40 or so yards on the ground for good measure to get you around 20 FF points for him, depending on your scoring format.

Book it...

He did go 297/1 last year.

[dj_stouty]

He did go 297/1 last year.

With 2 INTs and a 98-yard TD to TO to pad those stats. lol

I still like the guy's chances at home this weekend. I gotta good feeling on this...

[guess88]

I like that a TON more than your last one. AF and Moss will out produce CJ + garbage.

Yeah, he's actually just going to drop Jerome, but wanted to have even players to trade. He actually had a very good team, but is now dismantling it with a ton of trades (that are all fair mind you) because he wants to keep it exciting.

The only hold up is if other people in the league veto it, but everyone seems cool, so Foster and Moss shall be mine!!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA:moon1:

[guess88]

Cutlers hurt, stuck playing the waiver wire.

Hill vs STL or Kolb vs SF?

Hill without a doubt. He's been putting up monster numbers against better teams, and having Calvin Johnson makes a world of difference. If anything, if you can afford a roster spot, I'd find a way to stash Stafford for when he comes back. Hill's a decent back up, but I imagine Stafford putting up much better numbers when he settles back in after returning.

I also just don't like Kolb. And regardless of stats, he's always looked like sauce when I've seen him play.

If you want to gamble, I'd go Bradford. He seems to be getting better with each game, and I'm thoroughly impressed by what he's doing with such limited weapons.

[guess88]

Oddly enough, I'm curious about the two players in my last post.

Start: Shaun Hill or Bradford???

[cal_junior]

Colston, Driver and Clayton -- which 2 do I start?

[cal_junior]

Sorry, one more: Anybody see value in starting Torain over Ryan Mathews?

[Keino]

Sorry, one more: Anybody see value in starting Torain over Ryan Mathews?

Matthews has the better match-up but he hasn't been tearing it up. Go with your gut there. Do you think the Skins will get the run game going?

[Keino]

Colston, Driver and Clayton -- which 2 do I start?

If it were me, it would be Colston and Driver.

[cal_junior]

Do you think the Skins will get the run game going?

That's the question, isn't it? Williams being in the lineup makes me want to play Torain but I'm worried I'm being a homer.

[cal_junior]

If it were me, it would be Colston and Driver.

Right now I've got Driver and Clayton, only because I'm tired of Colston not doing much. I'm sure by game time I'll stuck Colston back in there. Too scary to miss a monster day

[guess88]

Right now I've got Driver and Clayton, only because I'm tired of Colston not doing much. I'm sure by game time I'll stuck Colston back in there. Too scary to miss a monster day

Clayton for sure as he's their #1, and I have a feeling that the Rams and Lions will turn into an awesome shoot out. Colston could have a giant day vs AZ, but the Saints will also spread it around like they always do. Driver always gets the underneath and possession passes from Rodgers, so it really depends on the Skins game plan. If we focus on taking away the deep threat of Jennings and amazing Finley, then Driver will flourish.

Definitely Torain over Mathews. Tolbert's been taking care of business in SD, and Torain is going against a heavily decimated GB defense.

[cal_junior]

Definitely Torain over Mathews. Tolbert's been taking care of business in SD, and Torain is going against a heavily decimated GB defense.

Yeah, as a Matthews owner I'm starting to hate Tolbert. I drafted Foster and Matthews this year and thought I might have the best backfield in our league. Then Tolbert starts getting all these short yardage carries . . .

Thanks for the input. I'm convinced whomever I bench between Driver, Clayton and Driver is going to have 9 catches and 3 TDs.

[guess88]

Santana Moss or Malcom Floyd???

[RedskinsDave]

Colston, Driver and Clayton -- which 2 do I start?

I don't think you can go wrong there since all three are projected top 15 this week. If I had to sit someone it would probably be Colston but of course he is going to come around one of these weeks.

[RedskinsDave]

Santana Moss or Malcom Floyd???

They are pretty even but Floyd should be covered by Asomugha.

[RedskinsDave]

That's the question, isn't it? Williams being in the lineup makes me want to play Torain but I'm worried I'm being a homer.

Me too. My decision is made easier by Mendenhall being on bye and Bradshaw being hobbled. I think I am starting Torain.

[HAWGZHEAD]

Anybody have any thoughts on Schaub or Eli? Started Eli last week and it bit me making it hard to pull the trigger on him this week but I feel like he may be better with Schaub having Johnson maybe limited and Jones out.

[guess88]

Anybody have any thoughts on Schaub or Eli? Started Eli last week and it bit me making it hard to pull the trigger on him this week but I feel like he may be better with Schaub having Johnson maybe limited and Jones out.

Tough one. I think Schaub's a better QB, but I think they're going to lean on Foster running wild for them, though if NY contains the run, Schaub can make all the throws and Johnson's still better than most WR on a bad day.

On the other hand... Houston's D is sauce, and Bradshaw is hobbled.

If a few points don't matter, Schaub. If you need a miracle to win, gamble on Eli who might finally have a big day.

[RedskinsDave]

Anybody have any thoughts on Schaub or Eli? Started Eli last week and it bit me making it hard to pull the trigger on him this week but I feel like he may be better with Schaub having Johnson maybe limited and Jones out.

I guess I'd like Eli a little better because Houston is more likely to lean on the run than the Giants.

[fent]

Gotta choose one of Tomlinson, Torain, or Mike Bush for my flex spot. I think I have them in that order. Anyone have thoughts on those?

[dj_stouty]

My "plug-in player" of the week...

Looks like Cutler is (wisely) out next weekend due to concussion. Call me crazy, but I think a solid 1-week option is Ryan Fitzpatrick in Buffalo. The Harvard grad faces a Jacksonville team that is 30th against the pass, worst (by far) in allowing passing plays of 40+ yards, worst (by far) in highest average yards per catch allowed, and 3rd worst in QB passer rating against them. The Bills will be at home and the weather is expected to be great for the passing game. Also, MJD hasn't been practicing all week so he may not be able to pound the ball and sway ball possession. Fred Jackson and CJ Spiller are also great passing targets in the flat and either one could take one to the house in open field.

I see a safe 250 yards passing, 2TDs and 1INT in the air, and an extra 40 or so yards on the ground for good measure to get you around 20 FF points for him, depending on your scoring format.

Book it...

*pats himself on the back* ;)

Fitzpatrick got me a solid 26 points this weekend. 220 with 3 TDs and 0 INTs!

[RedskinsDave]

So, my league doesn't give an RB anything unless he gets to 100 yards or scores. Because of that, MJD has sucked for me so far. Luckily I have Mendenhall and Bradshaw. Should I wait him out or try to move him? I am 5-0 so I don't have to do anything.

[dj_stouty]

So, my league doesn't give an RB anything unless he gets to 100 yards or scores. Because of that, MJD has sucked for me so far. Luckily I have Mendenhall and Bradshaw. Should I wait him out or try to move him? I am 5-0 so I don't have to do anything.

I'd stand pat. Aside from their 2 matchups against the Titans, the Jags have one of the more favorable schedules against bad rush defenses. Plus, MJD is always one cut away from a monster run...

[ihatedallas]

So, my league doesn't give an RB anything unless he gets to 100 yards or scores. Because of that, MJD has sucked for me so far. Luckily I have Mendenhall and Bradshaw. Should I wait him out or try to move him? I am 5-0 so I don't have to do anything.

I would wait, particularly if you're 5-0. Jacksonville plays Oakland and Indy in weeks 15-16, When are you're playoffs?

[guess88]

So, my league doesn't give an RB anything unless he gets to 100 yards or scores. Because of that, MJD has sucked for me so far. Luckily I have Mendenhall and Bradshaw. Should I wait him out or try to move him? I am 5-0 so I don't have to do anything.

They don't have many other weapons so you're secure with a feature back. Chris Johnson didn't blow it up last year until game 6. Then he decimated all.

[guess88]

Gotta choose one of Tomlinson, Torain, or Mike Bush for my flex spot. I think I have them in that order. Anyone have thoughts on those?

Tomlinson. Shouldn't even be a thought.

[cal_junior]

Since a knee injury removed Clayton from my fantasy team my new WR dilemma is Driver (MIA), Colston (TB) or Kenny Britt (JAX).

And once again I'm faced with deciding between Ryan Matthews (StL) and Torain.

[fent]

Tomlinson. Shouldn't even be a thought.

except Bush outperformed him significantly.

[ihatedallas]

Well on a 2-3 team there is a wide open competition at the flex spot.

Mike Williams vs NO
bjge vs Balt
Greene @ Denver
mike hart @ was

leaning towards mike williams

[guess88]

Since a knee injury removed Clayton from my fantasy team my new WR dilemma is Driver (MIA), Colston (TB) or Kenny Britt (JAX).

And once again I'm faced with deciding between Ryan Matthews (StL) and Torain.

Britt - everyone's scoring on the Jags, and Britt has a TD in each of the last three games

Matthews and Torain is tough. Indy is a team that can be run on, but we've still yet to establish the run in any games besides Phili, and that was only half a game. On the other hand, I think they'll need to establish the run with Torain to keep Manning off the field, though my theory on that was thrown out the window with the GB game. Matthews splits carries with Tolbert, but I think they want to give him more carries now, though Tolbert is definitely the goal line guy.

I'd gamble on Matthews finally having a breakout game, especially since they're playing STL. A bit of a toss up though.

[guess88]

except Bush outperformed him significantly.

Bush is also sharing time with McFadden (might be back this week), and going up against a slightly tougher run D in SF (18th ranked), though he did well against the 7th ranked run D in SD last week.

Tomlinson is generally an every week starter for me at this point. He's also got a favorable match up against the 27th ranked run D, that also has a banged up secondary. He might lose some carries to Greene, but Tomlinson is the clear cut #1.

[guess88]

Well on a 2-3 team there is a wide open competition at the flex spot.

Mike Williams vs NO
bjge vs Balt
Greene @ Denver
mike hart @ was

leaning towards mike williams

If Addai and Brown are out, definitely Hart. In fact, I'd probably start him even if Brown was eligible to play, though he becomes more of a gamble at that point as well.

Greene should be good for 35yds and a tD. Williams is a tough read, because there isn't much out there on him or his QB. However, he is their #1 and they'll probably be throwing a lot to try and keep up with NO (I have no faith in TB run game). BJGE is a huge question mark. Bmore's got a tough run D, and it'll be interesting to see the Pat's game plan without Moss, but anything's possible with Belichick and Brady.

Hart if he's the starter. Otherwise, assign each player a @ between 1-6 and roll dice.

[ihatedallas]

If Addai and Brown are out, definitely Hart. In fact, I'd probably start him even if Brown was eligible to play, though he becomes more of a gamble at that point as well.

Greene should be good for 35yds and a tD. Williams is a tough read, because there isn't much out there on him or his QB. However, he is their #1 and they'll probably be throwing a lot to try and keep up with NO (I have no faith in TB run game). BJGE is a huge question mark. Bmore's got a tough run D, and it'll be interesting to see the Pat's game plan without Moss, but anything's possible with Belichick and Brady.

Hart if he's the starter. Otherwise, assign each player a @ between 1-6 and roll dice.

Mike Williams has been really producing this year. He's had a td in 3 of 4 games, and Freeman loves him.

Balt's run D hasn't been as effective this year. They've already given up 3tds on the ground and aren't that high on the league leaders in YA. I do think Brady will be slinging it though.

Hart is who I will start if its determined Brown and Addai are out, which I think they will be. Indy has a bye I believe in week 7, so I think the coaches will just ride it out. Hart has a higher ceiling, but Williams is safer for about 8 points.

[cal_junior]

I'd gamble on Matthews finally having a breakout game, especially since they're playing STL. A bit of a toss up though.

Yeah, I think I'm leaning that way. Thanks for the help

[fent]

Bush is also sharing time with McFadden (might be back this week), and going up against a slightly tougher run D in SF (18th ranked), though he did well against the 7th ranked run D in SD last week.

Tomlinson is generally an every week starter for me at this point. He's also got a favorable match up against the 27th ranked run D, that also has a banged up secondary. He might lose some carries to Greene, but Tomlinson is the clear cut #1.

That question was for last week. Should have pointed that out, but I posted it before the games started Sunday.

[RedskinsDave]

Finley is out 8-10 weeks. My only hope is this ups Jennings value.

[guess88]

That question was for last week. Should have pointed that out, but I posted it before the games started Sunday.

My bad. I still would've said Tomlinson anyway. :)

[guess88]

Finley is out 8-10 weeks. My only hope is this ups Jennings value.

I'm there with you. Got Jennings on like 4 of my teams.. still waiting for a payday.

[dj_stouty]

Any Cutler owners sticking with him post-concussion against Seattle...or are you starting someone else?

[ihatedallas]

Any Cutler owners sticking with him post-concussion against Seattle...or are you starting someone else?

Going post concussion. Its my belief he really could have played last week, but they figured they could get by Carolina without him.

Seattle has a terrible pass defense so I'm assuming he'll soar.

[RedskinsDave]

Best problem to have: too many RBs to choose from.

MJD, Mendenhall, Bradshaw and Torain. Because we only get points at 100 yds or TDs, I am leaning Mendenhall/Bradshaw. All four could get 100 but we also get bonuses for receiving TDs and long scores.

[guess88]

Best problem to have: too many RBs to choose from.

MJD, Mendenhall, Bradshaw and Torain. Because we only get points at 100 yds or TDs, I am leaning Mendenhall/Bradshaw. All four could get 100 but we also get bonuses for receiving TDs and long scores.

I'd follow your instincts and go with Mendenhall and Bradshaw as well. Torain's unproven, and MJD is going up against a tough D in TN. Plus Mendenhall is an every week starter, and Bradshaw has been getting hot against some tougher defenses

[CarMike]

T. Romo -vs- Minnesota OR K. Orton -vs- NY Jets

&

B. Tate -vs- Baltimore OR M. Manningham -vs- Detroit

Thanks.

[RedskinsDave]

T. Romo -vs- Minnesota OR K. Orton -vs- NY Jets

&

B. Tate -vs- Baltimore OR M. Manningham -vs- Detroit

Thanks.

Romo.

Tate has a bigger upside so I'd go with him.

[CarMike]

Romo.

Tate has a bigger upside so I'd go with him.

Agree on both.

[fent]

I just got offered Rivers and Stewart for my Eli and Bradshaw. My other RBs are Arian, Gore, and Barber. My WRs are Austin, Roddy, and Ward, so basically instead of flexing Bradshaw I'd be choosing matchups between Ward and Stewart while upgrading my QB situation. Any reason to not accept that immediately?

[Keino]

I just got offered Rivers and Stewart for my Eli and Bradshaw. My other RBs are Arian, Gore, and Barber. My WRs are Austin, Roddy, and Ward, so basically instead of flexing Bradshaw I'd be choosing matchups between Ward and Stewart while upgrading my QB situation. Any reason to not accept that immediately?

As we discussed side-bar......None at all. You have the depth to withstand the hit at RB and it could turn out in your favor if Carolina moves Williams or he gets hurt.

[guess88]

I just got offered Rivers and Stewart for my Eli and Bradshaw. My other RBs are Arian, Gore, and Barber. My WRs are Austin, Roddy, and Ward, so basically instead of flexing Bradshaw I'd be choosing matchups between Ward and Stewart while upgrading my QB situation. Any reason to not accept that immediately?

Rivers is a dime piece, but would the trade really give you an advantage overall? Your QB points will be more consistent, but then you'll be worrying more about your flex. The points drop off from Rivers to Manning isn't too harsh. Really depends on your long term plans. I think keeping Eli and Bradshaw is the safer route, but getting Rivers shores up one position and you can gamble on Stewart getting traded or use him, ward, and barber as trade bait for a decent back. I always prefer having RB's in my flex if I can (unless they allow QB's :) I just like RB's more... I don't think you can really go wrong with the trade. Make the season exciting. Make the trade. But be warned.

[RedskinsDave]

I like getting Rivers but the Bradshaw-Stewart side is pretty lopsided. Since you do have better RB's to start, I would probably make the move but is there another back he has to make it a little more even?

My general philosophy is unless there is big upside for me, I don't move.

[fent]

I like getting Rivers but the Bradshaw-Stewart side is pretty lopsided. Since you do have better RB's to start, I would probably make the move but is there another back he has to make it a little more even?

My general philosophy is unless there is big upside for me, I don't move.

No potential there for another RB in this deal, but I have another move on the table to potentially pull back Wayne and Turner for Foster and Ward.

[RedskinsDave]

I just got offered Rivers and Stewart for my Eli and Bradshaw. My other RBs are Arian, Gore, and Barber. My WRs are Austin, Roddy, and Ward, so basically instead of flexing Bradshaw I'd be choosing matchups between Ward and Stewart while upgrading my QB situation. Any reason to not accept that immediately?

No potential there for another RB in this deal, but I have another move on the table to potentially pull back Wayne and Turner for Foster and Ward.

What's your end goal? That looks like another wash trade even though you are getting the better of the deal. It looks like you're in my boat where you're getting antsy to make a move despite having a really solid team.

[fent]

What's your end goal? That looks like another wash trade even though you are getting the better of the deal. It looks like you're in my boat where you're getting antsy to make a move despite having a really solid team.

Changes my starting roster from

Eli
Gore/Foster/Bradshaw
Austin/White

to

Rivers
Gore/Turner
Austin/White/Wayne

I like that 2nd one better than what I'm currently working with.

[RedskinsDave]

Oh, if you do both, I like it. The second team is better.

[guess88]

Oh, if you do both, I like it. The second team is better.

+1

[fent]

Oh, if you do both, I like it. The second team is better.

+1

Just got the 2nd one through. Time to see if the moves were positive. Hard to argue with Rivers, Gore, Turner, Austin, White, and Wayne, though.

[RedskinsDave]

Just got the 2nd one through. Time to see if the moves were positive. Hard to argue with Rivers, Gore, Turner, Austin, White, and Wayne, though.

So both trades went?

[fent]

So both trades went?

Yeah. Offensive roster is now Rivers, Gore, Turner, Austin, White, Wayne, Shiancoe. Outside of Rivers, all those guys were top 30 picks in our league.

[RedskinsDave]

Yeah. Offensive roster is now Rivers, Gore, Turner, Austin, White, Wayne, Shiancoe. Outside of Rivers, all those guys were top 30 picks in our league.

Nice. There have to be other owners who aren't happy about your team now.

[fent]

Nice. There have to be other owners who aren't happy about your team now.

None of them are returning texts, so they either haven't realized what the final roster looks like or they aren't willing to talk to me at the moment. I'm a little worried about giving up Foster after the day Gore and Turner have had, but hopefully it works out over the course of the season.

[RedskinsDave]

None of them are returning texts, so they either haven't realized what the final roster looks like or they aren't willing to talk to me at the moment. I'm a little worried about giving up Foster after the day Gore and Turner have had, but hopefully it works out over the course of the season.

Gore just ripped off a 60 yarder. That might cost me my game this week.

[fent]

Gore just ripped off a 60 yarder. That might cost me my game this week.

Yeah, I just checked my game to see that. Still might not be enough for me. As it stands now, I need Dallas Clark and Mojo to stay under 28 points combined. If Austin had showed up at all this week, I'd be in a much better position.

[fent]

Chris Ivory or Jonathan Stewart as a flex this week?

[RedskinsDave]

Chris Ivory or Jonathan Stewart as a flex this week?

If Ivory gets the start go with him.

[RedskinsDave]

Yeah, I just checked my game to see that. Still might not be enough for me. As it stands now, I need Dallas Clark and Mojo to stay under 28 points combined. If Austin had showed up at all this week, I'd be in a much better position.

I ended up winning by 1 thanks to the Redskins defense making Addai look like a hall of famer on that one drive. My opponent had Manning.

[RedskinsDave]

This is going to be a weekly issue for me but I'd rather have to choose from two good players than two bad.

MJD or Bradshaw. Note that I need 100 yds or a TD for points.

[fent]

This is going to be a weekly issue for me but I'd rather have to choose from two good players than two bad.

MJD or Bradshaw. Note that I need 100 yds or a TD for points.

Tough one....I'd be inclined to go with Bradshaw. KC's rush defense has been pretty stout...averaging 90 ypg. Add the Bouman experience to the equation and I doubt KC will run many plays without 9 defenders in the box.

[RedskinsDave]

Tough one....I'd be inclined to go with Bradshaw. KC's rush defense has been pretty stout...averaging 90 ypg. Add the Bouman experience to the equation and I doubt KC will run many plays without 9 defenders in the box.

That was my thinking too.

[guess88]

This is going to be a weekly issue for me but I'd rather have to choose from two good players than two bad.

MJD or Bradshaw. Note that I need 100 yds or a TD for points.

Def Bradshaw

[Keino]

Some moron in my league just dropped:

Matt Schaub, Chris Johnson and Steve Smith

and picked up:

Ryan Leaf, Trung Canidate and Sean Sanford.

One of the league members freaked out at the obvious joke.....

[fent]

Some moron in my league just dropped:

Matt Schaub, Chris Johnson and Steve Smith

and picked up:

Ryan Leaf, Trung Canidate and Sean Sanford.

One of the league members freaked out at the obvious joke.....

Leaf and Canidate are in your player pool?? Or did you doctor an email?

[Keino]

Leaf and Canidate are in your player pool?? Or did you doctor an email?

DJ Doctored an email. It was pretty funny.

One owner was like "Does this mean I can't pick-up Johnson?" LOL.

[fent]

DJ Doctored an email. It was pretty funny.

One owner was like "Does this mean I can't pick-up Johnson?" LOL.

Awesome. I might have to try that one out.

[guess88]

Why did I not start Kenny Britt!?!?!?!?!!!!!:banghead:

[RedskinsDave]

I got lucky that my opponent had half his team on a bye because I benched both MJD and Hines Ward.

[dj_stouty]

DJ Doctored an email. It was pretty funny.

One owner was like "Does this mean I can't pick-up Johnson?" LOL.

I can't believe he bit on that email, but I guess he was preoccupied when he opened it. All he had to do was actually read it to find out it was fake. Hell, I even wrote the word "fake" inside the text. lol

Too bad he didn't force the transation. I could have used a better kicker than the one I got... ;)

[dj_stouty]

Why did I not start Kenny Britt!?!?!?!?!!!!!:banghead:

A guy in the league Keino and I are in, benched both Britt and McFadden, thus leaving 90 points on the bench. lol

[guess88]

Hmmm...

Lee Evans vs KC or Welker vs Minny or Michael Bush vs Seattle????

[RedskinsDave]

Hmmm...

Lee Evans vs KC or Welker vs Minny or Michael Bush vs Seattle????

I assume its non-PPR or this would be an easier call. I just think Welker has more upside. Bush is out of the equation for me. Its a coin toss for the other two.

[dj_stouty]

I assume its non-PPR or this would be an easier call. I just think Welker has more upside. Bush is out of the equation for me. Its a coin toss for the other two.

Agreed. Welker will get touches. Evans has 15 games a year where he gets 30 yard/game and 0TDs...then he has 1 game with 100 yards and 3TDs. That game happened last week. Its not going to happen back-to-back weeks with him.

[fent]

I'm in bye week hell, so I need a RB and a flex out of Ivory, Stewart, and David Gettis. I'm leaning Ivory and Gettis. Anyone think I should go with Stewart for some reason?

edit: nevermind...just saw that Williams might be out this week...that certainly changes things.

Dez Bryant and Patrick Crayton are probably the best options on the wire.

[RedskinsDave]

I'm in bye week hell, so I need a RB and a flex out of Ivory, Stewart, and David Gettis. I'm leaning Ivory and Gettis. Anyone think I should go with Stewart for some reason?

edit: nevermind...just saw that Williams might be out this week...that certainly changes things.

Dez Bryant and Patrick Crayton are probably the best options on the wire.

Definitely Stewart based on the injury report. Of the rest, I like Bryant. The only negative is the Cowboys will most likely try to establish the run (talk about 5 weeks too late).

[RedskinsDave]

I have my usual problem of choosing between good players. My league has the old fashioned scoring where points are given at 100 yds and for TDs.

I have to choose 2 from MJD, Mendenhall and Torain. I am leaning Mendenhall/Torain. I honestly would trade MJD if I didn't like his match ups during the playoff weeks.

My WR choices are 3 from Ward, Williams (TB), Jennings, Branch and Bess. I am leaning Ward, Williams and Branch provided he is healthy Sunday.

[cal_junior]

Marcedes Lewis at Dallas . . .

. . . or a roll of the dice with

Jacob Tamme against Houston

[RedskinsDave]

Marcedes Lewis at Dallas . . .

. . . or a roll of the dice with

Jacob Tamme against Houston

I like Tamme this week.

[cal_junior]

I like Tamme this week.

Me too. I generally hate Lewis, unfortunately I'm a grieving Jermichael Finley
owner and relegated to scrubs

[RedskinsDave]

Me too. I generally hate Lewis, unfortunately I'm a grieving Jermichael Finley
owner and relegated to scrubs

I lost him too. Luckily I had Dustin Keller and added Winslow.

[CarMike]

Ahmad Bradshaw -vs- Dallass

or

Maurice Jones-Drew -vs- Houston

Last time AB ran for 126 yards against dallass but zero TDs

MJD ran for 76 and had one reception for 6 yards against the Texans the last time they played.

I hate going by past games when trying to figure out who to start.

Leaning towards AB right now.

I just did some extra digging and surprised to see that Bradshaw his never scored a TD against dallass in his career.

[fent]

Ahmad Bradshaw -vs- Dallass

or

Maurice Jones-Drew -vs- Houston

Last time AB ran for 126 yards against dallass but zero TDs

MJD ran for 76 and had one reception for 6 yards against the Texans the last time they played.

I hate going by past games when trying to figure out who to start.

Leaning towards AB right now.

I just did some extra digging and surprised to see that Bradshaw his never scored a TD against dallass in his career.

Can you not start both? If not, I think I'd go with Bradshaw.

On a similar note...Miles Austin, Dez Bryant or Manningham as my 3rd WR?

[CarMike]

Can you not start both? If not, I think I'd go with Bradshaw.

On a similar note...Miles Austin, Dez Bryant or Manningham as my 3rd WR?

My other starting RB is Arien Foster. Only two spots for starting RBs.

I'd go with Dez Bryant. However, with Steve Smith missing the game today, Manningham may be the way to go.

[CarMike]

unF'Nbelievable. :D

[RedskinsDave]

I had the same decision, sorta. I had to pick two from MJD, Bradshaw and Mendenhall and I picked MJD and Mendenhall. At least one of them has worked.

[CarMike]

I had the same decision, sorta. I had to pick two from MJD, Bradshaw and Mendenhall and I picked MJD and Mendenhall. At least one of them has worked.

Good for you Dave. And of course, Foster has forgotten there's a game today it appears.

[fent]

Well, I come into tonight tied and my opponent throwing McCoy at me tonight. I left Dez on the bench, so while Manningham had a decent day, the extra 8 points would have been nice. Of course, the 20 points by which Dez outproduced Wayne would be nice to have as well.

[RedskinsDave]

So St. Michael the dog killer got 89 points in my money league. What did he get in your leagues?

[fent]

65 in my league.

[CarMike]

58 in one of my leagues. I don't care enough to check the others. lol

Bastage.

[RedskinsDave]

So I have Mendenhall, MJD and Bradshaw and have locked up my division and a first round bye. What do you guys think about trying to package Mendenhall and Bradshaw for someone like AP or CJ? Both teams who own those guys have little depth.

[dj_stouty]

So I have Mendenhall, MJD and Bradshaw and have locked up my division and a first round bye. What do you guys think about trying to package Mendenhall and Bradshaw for someone like AP or CJ? Both teams who own those guys have little depth.

If you are going to trade for CJ, do it in time to start him against the Skins this weekend. lol

[justinskins]

Simple question: should I drop Favre and replace him with someone like Troy Smith or Colt McCoy (or even JC)? All three of those guys are available in my league, but our scoring system values passing TDs a lot more than yards (we get 1 point for every 50 passing yards, and 6 pts for passing TDs). Right now Favre is riding my bench because Rivers is my starting QB, but we have a generous flex spot that I could plug my second QB into if he got hot.

My concern is that Favre is still a better QB than any of those guys, even if he is old and beat-up. Plus he showed two weeks ago that he still has some upside. Then again, I'm not sure if he'll even be around by the end of the season... help.

[dj_stouty]

Simple question: should I drop Favre and replace him with someone like Troy Smith or Colt McCoy (or even JC)? All three of those guys are available in my league, but our scoring system values passing TDs a lot more than yards (we get 1 point for every 50 passing yards, and 6 pts for passing TDs). Right now Favre is riding my bench because Rivers is my starting QB, but we have a generous flex spot that I could plug my second QB into if he got hot.

My concern is that Favre is still a better QB than any of those guys, even if he is old and beat-up. Plus he showed two weeks ago that he still has some upside. Then again, I'm not sure if he'll even be around by the end of the season... help.

Keep him. He gets to throw against our Defense in two weeks. He should put up sizable yardage and scores. I can't imagine what a healthy Percy Harvin could do to us in open space.

After the Skins game...dump him for whoever seems to be hot. If the Vikings are seriously out of contention in December, I could see Brett sitting for a plethora of reasons.

[RedskinsDave]

Simple question: should I drop Favre and replace him with someone like Troy Smith or Colt McCoy (or even JC)? All three of those guys are available in my league, but our scoring system values passing TDs a lot more than yards (we get 1 point for every 50 passing yards, and 6 pts for passing TDs). Right now Favre is riding my bench because Rivers is my starting QB, but we have a generous flex spot that I could plug my second QB into if he got hot.

My concern is that Favre is still a better QB than any of those guys, even if he is old and beat-up. Plus he showed two weeks ago that he still has some upside. Then again, I'm not sure if he'll even be around by the end of the season... help.

He's your back up. Leave him be.

[cal_junior]

Colston (SEA) or Mike Williams (SF)?

I was going to definitely go Colston until MW got a DUI last night. Now based on the Kenny Britt Principle I assume he'll have 12 catches, 250 yards and 4 TDs

[justinskins]

Colston (SEA) or Mike Williams (SF)?

I was going to definitely go Colston until MW got a DUI last night. Now based on the Kenny Britt Principle I assume he'll have 12 catches, 250 yards and 4 TDs

You can't start both? Colston is definitely the safer play given Williams' DUI might cut into his playing time. Also, having Reggie Bush back might draw some attention away from the receivers.

[cal_junior]

You can't start both? Colston is definitely the safer play given Williams' DUI might cut into his playing time. Also, having Reggie Bush back might draw some attention away from the receivers.

Unlike the Washington Redskins I know how to coach Brandon Lloyd, so he has to start.

I'll probably end up with Colston, especially since their still going to be without Thomas. Thanks for the input.