PDA

View Full Version : No Purple Hearts for Soldiers Wounded by Artillery Fire?


Spence
12-05-2003, 05:39 PM
Posted on Fri, Dec. 05, 2003

Denial of Purple Heart medals raises questions about casualty count
BY PATRICK PETERSON
Knight Ridder Newspapers

GULFPORT, Miss. - (KRT) - An influential Mississippi congressman has raised the possibility that the Pentagon has undercounted combat casualties in Iraq after he learned that five members of the Mississippi National Guard who were injured Sept. 12 by a booby trap in Iraq were denied Purple Heart medals.

The guardsmen were wounded by an artillery shell that detonated as their convoy passed the tree in which it was hidden, but their injuries were classified as "noncombat," according to Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss. Taylor, a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, learned of the classification when he visited the most seriously injured of the guardsmen, Spc. Carl Sampson, 35, at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.

"How could no one have caught this?" Taylor said.

On Nov. 20, shortly after visiting Sampson, Taylor brought the matter to the attention of Gen. Richard B. Myers, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Purple Hearts quickly were awarded.

But Taylor said the incident raised concerns that Iraq combat casualties had been understated. He said Myers told him he'd been made aware of similar oversights.

"I'm probably going to send a memo out to the rest of the members of Congress and ask if anyone has had a similar incident," Taylor said Friday. "I just don't want to see anyone else who's been injured get cheated about their Purple Heart."

Defense Department statistics show that as of Thursday, some 2,150 service members had been wounded in action in Iraq, while 354 were injured in nonhostile incidents. Of 441 service members who've died in Iraq, 304 are listed as killed in hostile action; 137 deaths resulted from nonhostile action.

A Pentagon spokesman said the decision to award the Purple Heart was made at a unit level and that he couldn't explain how the misclassification occurred.

Members of the Mississippi National Guard were mystified. "Sampson should have already been awarded a Purple Heart," said Lt. Col. Tim Powell, a spokesman for the Guard. "An improvised explosive device built and placed with the intent to harm American soldiers is hostile."

Sampson, who sustained shrapnel wounds to his face and arms, is now hospitalized in Tampa, Fla. This seems pretty outrageous to me. The soldiers were injured by an artillery shell. How is that a non-combat injury? Why were they denied their purple hearts? And how often is this happening? Just how many of our soldiers have been injured in a similar manner without the American people being notified and proper honors bestowed?

Source (http://www.centredaily.com/mld/centredaily/news/7424577.htm)

RedskinsDave
12-05-2003, 06:04 PM
I guess they're looking at those guys as if they're the knight from Monte Python's The Holy Grail. "Shraphnel? Tis only a flesh wound!" :cussing:

NamVet4
12-08-2003, 02:19 PM
Like everything in the military, there are regulations concerning the entitlement to a service medal. AR 600_8_2: 2-8e I think is the one that covers the awarding of the Purple Heart. As with all things military, there is a procedure that does intiate at the unit level and goes up the chain of command until it reaches an approving authority that is considered as the final approval.
This whole story indicates that there was a foul up - intentional or not is open for debate. It certainly brings into question how effective the support organization is for the troops in a combat zone.
Hopefully, a congressional inquiry, which has rules regarding the submission and answering of the inquiry, will be sufficient enough to correct any oversites.
Personally, as a recipient of a few medals, I can attest that the military is not always efficient or quick, but ususally tries to do the right thing.
The circumstances outlined in this story indicte the military for a failure on number of levels, but as is usually the case, mis-communications is the culprit.
It will be interesting to see if further incidents of this nature are reported.:(

NamVet4
12-10-2003, 01:32 PM
BTW...........I'm personally appalled at whoever and whatever is responsible for this foul up. It sends a bad signal about our concern for our service men and women . I'm sure the terrorist look at this as another piece of info that demonstrates American insensitivity and stupidity.