Quote:
Originally Posted by JsMaViSd
(Post 1429106)
They went 10-6 in 2010. I would kill to have a 10-6 season here and win the division.
|
So best case scenario you get a 10-6 season then what? The team needs a long term answer and being closer to the top of the draft, as they are now, presents the best odds and cheapest avenue with which to address that spot.
Quote:
Framework and system in Indy? Peyton MADE that system in Indy, lol. Did that system or framework help Orlovsky? Painter? Collins? That system is Peyton.
|
That's an oversimplification and if you think it's that cut and dry then there's not much else to discuss.
Quote:
Signing Peyton and drafting a QB in the 2nd or 3rd is not doing anything to our franchise. RGIII and Luck will be gone by the 6th pick. We going to draft Tannehill @ 6? Doubt it. We would be drafting a QB there anyways.
|
If this team feels it necessary to go after a FA QB (Flynn, Manning, Orton) then Peyton is the easy answer. Perhaps they do so feeling that they can get a mid-round guy (Foles/Cousings/Osweiler/Wilson)that will emerge after some time sitting behind him, and if that's how it shakes out then I'm hopeful they get it right. Typically mid-round QB's don't pan out so this course statistically would result in a short term rental of Peyton without a real answer at QB.
Quote:
IMO, there is not a QB after the top 2 that can start day one. Of course a Dalton or someone can always happen, but do you honestly think that that luck can happen here in DC? Do you have faith in our system to think that would happen here? I highly doubt it.
|
I don't believe in nonsense like curses affecting teams. Numerous factors play into a successful team building process and high quality players emerging and I do think that this staff/system can produce that. If they feel so lacking in their ability to find a QB and instead have to fall back on a broken/breaking down legend (to some degree for the second time) then that speaks volumes.
Quote:
Get a Vet and groom your future behind him. Just like Brees did, just like Rodgers did. That's how it should be.
|
Ideally, but this team has a lot of needs. I'm not 100% against Peyton because it would allow them to fix a lot of other holes, whereas a trade up would not, but I'd prefer they try to fix the massive problem at QB with a lasting answer. I just don't think Peyton's health will make him long for whatever team he chooses, if he's even able to get back on the field. I also don't know why he'd want to come to the Redskins when there are other teams much closer to a real run that he could go to.
Quote:
If we go out and sign Orton as our starter, I will be upset. He would put this franchise back. I would not have been opposed to it last offseason, but definitely not this year.
|
Orton sucks, is marginally better than Rex and offers little more than some good optional comedy about his neck beard.
|