Go Back   hailRedskins.com Fan Board > hailRedskins.com Fan Forums > the Cherokee Redskins Tribe

View Poll Results: who are the top 3 WRs next year?
Coles, Gardner, Thrash 10 7.58%
Coles, Thrash, McCants 12 9.09%
Coles, McCants, Thrash 20 15.15%
Coles, Gardner, McCants 50 37.88%
Coles, McCants or Thrash, Jacobs 40 30.30%
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

who are going to be the top 3 WR???
  #1  
Old 03-29-2004, 11:53 PM
guinness4health's Avatar
guinness4health guinness4health is offline
Sentinel
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,680
Default who are going to be the top 3 WR???

this is of course depending on McCants getting resigned. overwise T Jacobs would jump into the mix

Last edited by guinness4health : 03-30-2004 at 12:03 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 03-30-2004, 12:06 AM
Yudolindo's Avatar
Yudolindo Yudolindo is offline
Brave
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Internet
Posts: 1,130
Default

Voted the only option that did not include James Thrash.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 03-30-2004, 12:18 AM
Dexter72's Avatar
Dexter72 Dexter72 is offline
Brave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,286
Default

None of the above...Coles, Gardner, and I'll say Taylor Jacobs to help stretch the field. McCants will get plenty of time, but Jacobs is no slouch and was projected as a first-rounder last year -- he's a shade over 6'0 and ran a sub 4.4 40. Since all we are hearing about right now is individual workouts, here is his from last year - very impressive: [from ProFootballWeekly -- http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW...Days040103.htm ] --

Florida’s Taylor Jacobs attacked his pro day March 19 with the same zest. He caught the attention of a huge gathering of scouts and front-office men with a 4.37 40 and 6.8-second three-cone time. He looked even better catching passes afterward, when a pass thrown his way never touched the grass.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 03-30-2004, 12:21 AM
badpigs442's Avatar
badpigs442 badpigs442 is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: austin tx
Posts: 1,594
Default

Not to be contraversial but I'd say Coles, McCants and Jacobs. Gardner will likely be traded and Thrash will split time with DMAC and Taylor, while also returning kicks.
__________________
To the world you are one person, but to one person you may be the world. Football is a way of life. Go Skins!!!!
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 03-30-2004, 12:34 AM
Dexter72's Avatar
Dexter72 Dexter72 is offline
Brave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,286
Default

Yeah, based on the latest Post Article, I have to change my answer and agree with badpigs -- sounds like DMac is getting promoted to the number 2 and Rod will be packing his bags. I hope Thrash is just a vet backup for DMac and Taylor. I thought Rod was okay, but apparently they think otherwise. Hopefully, if they deal Rod they can turn the pick into a D-Lineman -- I would think they should be able to get a 2nd rounder for the guy...Yes? No?
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 03-30-2004, 12:43 AM
badpigs442's Avatar
badpigs442 badpigs442 is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: austin tx
Posts: 1,594
Default

I would agree we might could get a second from San Diego, They need receivers badly. Rod right now to us is like a third nipple, he's the guy that should be the man but just isn't. We could use the second on line right now and that would be a heck-of-a-trade. We might also look for a conditional 3rd that could become a 1 in 05.
__________________
To the world you are one person, but to one person you may be the world. Football is a way of life. Go Skins!!!!
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 03-30-2004, 12:54 AM
Dexter72's Avatar
Dexter72 Dexter72 is offline
Brave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,286
Default

Yeah, he'd make sense in SD since 1) Eli probably should have a possession receiver who can help bail him out, 2) They need a replacement for Boston, 3) Marty drafted Rod.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 03-30-2004, 01:00 AM
badpigs442's Avatar
badpigs442 badpigs442 is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: austin tx
Posts: 1,594
Default

3) Marty drafted Rod.

I'd forgotten about that. Seems logical, what with Boston and Johnson(Keshawn) teaming up with old coaches. I'd still say they'd be better off trying Brees with a couple of star recievers, but once again I'm biased. Check out Chargers #1 in All NFL forum,
__________________
To the world you are one person, but to one person you may be the world. Football is a way of life. Go Skins!!!!

Last edited by badpigs442 : 03-30-2004 at 01:04 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 03-30-2004, 01:32 AM
IowaSkinsFan's Avatar
IowaSkinsFan IowaSkinsFan is offline
Great Spirit
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 40° 57' 49" N / 91° 33' 29" W
Posts: 21,156
Default

#4.

The acquisition of Thrash and the good reports from minicamp on Jacobs, plus the contract info DMC lead me to believe that Gardner will be shopped.
__________________
A buffalo herd can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo & those are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole because the health of the herd keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. Similarly, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Intake of alcohol, killing the slowest & weakest brain cells first, makes the brain a faster, more efficient machine. That's why you always feel smarter after a few beers.
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 03-30-2004, 01:46 AM
natgbz's Avatar
natgbz natgbz is offline
Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 865
Default

Coles obviously, highly likely for McCants with that new contract of his, likely as well for Jacobs to stick around after the nice things that Gibbs has been sayingabout him, and of course Thrash. With this gruop alone we are stocked. Gardner, you were Marty's boy, not Joe's. Good luck to you in the future.
__________________
Hail to the Redskins...
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old 03-30-2004, 03:35 AM
SkinTastic SkinTastic is offline
Papoose
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 36
Default

Have to agree, Coles, McCants, with a Jacobs/Thrash mix. If we can get a second round pick for Gardner, it will be a good deal!
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 03-30-2004, 03:42 AM
Farbod's Avatar
Farbod Farbod is offline
Scalper
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 558
Default

1. Coles
2. DMac
3. Taylor
4. Thrash
5. Cloman

Trade Gardner for 3rd rounder would be nice... San Diego trading top 2nd round pick is not an option... No way theyd trade the 33rd pick in the draft for a #2 reciever...
__________________
Good Luck LaVar... You were a fan favorite...
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old 04-05-2004, 02:43 PM
WinslowRedskin's Avatar
WinslowRedskin WinslowRedskin is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Farbod
1. Coles
2. DMac
3. Taylor
4. Thrash
5. Cloman

Trade Gardner for 3rd rounder would be nice... San Diego trading top 2nd round pick is not an option... No way theyd trade the 33rd pick in the draft for a #2 reciever...
What he said!
__________________




Sig change (and maybe name change) after draft.
Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old 04-05-2004, 07:47 PM
colkurtz's Avatar
colkurtz colkurtz is offline
Spirit
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, PA
Posts: 9,066
Default

Coles
McCants
Jacob
Thrash [back-up #3] PLUS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Winslow II - TE - with speed of WR - He and Coles will truley open up the field

I give the 'Skins a 40% chance of drafting him [Winslow] - he, Portis, the WR corps, better plocking and Brunell/Ramsey will take this offense to the elite of the league.....
[leaving poor G. Williams to try his sorcery on a 'limited gene pool' of defensive talent].

Hail!
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old 04-06-2004, 11:52 AM
Meadowlark Meadowlark is offline
Papoose
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 48
Default

Coles #1, obviously. I can see the team considering Jacobs and McCants both #2 and using them in particular situations. Gardener, being a FA next year, I think will be traded for whatever we can get, within reason.

Have to say a good word for Thrash. Good character guy who probably fits well Gibbs' definition of a Redskin. Will be a solid #3 or 4 WR and , of course, likely a key contributor on special teams.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:45 AM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |