Go Back   hailRedskins.com Fan Board > hailRedskins.com Fan Forums > the Cherokee Redskins Tribe

View Poll Results: Should coles be a #1 or #2 next year
Yes, once his toe is healed he can be a great #1 42 89.36%
No, even if his toe is healed, we still need a dominant #1 5 10.64%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Coles on pace for 94 catches
  #1  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:05 PM
IMALILTEAPOT's Avatar
IMALILTEAPOT IMALILTEAPOT is offline
Shaman
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,746
Default Coles on pace for 94 catches

Even with all the offensive struggles we have had, Coles is tied for 4th in the nfl in catches and is on pace for 94 catches and possibly more because we play some bad defenses the next 3 games. of course, the yardage and tds show our struggles, but do u guys think next year he should be our #1 wide out or should we get someone else and move coles to #2?
__________________
Artist Formerly Known As YoungSkin26
RIP #21
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:08 PM
Ramsey2Moss's Avatar
Ramsey2Moss Ramsey2Moss is offline
Warrior
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 2,605
Default

Coles should be 1, with Williams or Edwards or Clayton at 2.
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:10 PM
dukeuch dukeuch is offline
Sachem
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,960
Default

Yeah, but he's just a posession receiver, right?
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:13 PM
Sonoma Sonoma is offline
Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dukeuch
Yeah, but he's just a posession receiver, right?

I would not consider Coles a posession receiver, he has big play capability if he is healthy. When healthy he probably is the fastest receiver on the Skins, alot of people say Jacobs but I feel Coles is the fastest.

Coles is definitely a number 1 receiver
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:17 PM
IMALILTEAPOT's Avatar
IMALILTEAPOT IMALILTEAPOT is offline
Shaman
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,746
Default

I said #2, but i view it as 1a and 1b like hockeygoalie said. if he is healthy, we could see the type of coles that we saw the first 3-4 weeks last year. man, he was crazy
__________________
Artist Formerly Known As YoungSkin26
RIP #21
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:17 PM
smoak's Avatar
smoak smoak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 27,423
Default

coles. anyone who thinks mike williams will come in and dominate right away is probably wrong? how often does that happen? anquan bolden is the only one i remember this second... guys like andre johnson, buress, roy williams, and charles johnson take awhile to get accustomed to the NFL.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:21 PM
BIGSEF3's Avatar
BIGSEF3 BIGSEF3 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,682
Default

coles is our #1 but i dont think there is a defense in the NFL that would waste their time double-teaming him. our passing game is not deep enough and he just isnt good enough to be worth a consistant doubleteam.

you double-team Terrell Owens, Chad Johnson or Marvin Harrison. You don't double Team Laverneus Coles. Thats like saying you need to have a QB spy on Mark Brunell to make sure he doesnt run from the pocket and get 20 yards.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 12-16-2004, 05:12 PM
dukeuch dukeuch is offline
Sachem
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,960
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonoma
I would not consider Coles a posession receiver, he has big play capability if he is healthy. When healthy he probably is the fastest receiver on the Skins, alot of people say Jacobs but I feel Coles is the fastest.

Coles is definitely a number 1 receiver
Just being sarcastic. When talking about Monk, lots of folks, including supporters, call him a possesion receiver. Well, Coles is averaging less than 11 yards pre reception, so...
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 12-16-2004, 05:14 PM
IMALILTEAPOT's Avatar
IMALILTEAPOT IMALILTEAPOT is offline
Shaman
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dukeuch
Just being sarcastic. When talking about Monk, lots of folks, including supporters, call him a possesion receiver. Well, Coles is averaging less than 11 yards pre reception, so...
yea, just like i made a thread on this a while back, we are wasting coles as a deep threat. but the next game, i expect us to take some shots down field
__________________
Artist Formerly Known As YoungSkin26
RIP #21
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 12-15-2004, 08:11 PM
Skins57's Avatar
Skins57 Skins57 is offline
Great Spirit
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chambersburg PA
Posts: 10,285
Default

It is hard to say with teh offenses we have had here the last 2 yaers. I think he could but I would like to see him get in the end zone more to be true number 1. He is on pace for 94 catches, it is a shame they all went for 7 yards( not his fault)
__________________
Rest In Peace Sean, you will never be forgotten
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:21 PM
2Cooley's Avatar
2Cooley 2Cooley is offline
Warrior
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbia,South Carolina
Posts: 2,620
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramsey2Coles
Coles should be 1, with Williams or Edwards or Clayton at 2.

I agree that should be our fist round pick
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 12-16-2004, 04:01 PM
IndianBaller27's Avatar
IndianBaller27 IndianBaller27 is offline
Spirit
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gaithersburg, Maryland
Posts: 8,672
Default

He is gonna be an even greater weapon when his toe is healed.
__________________

Thanks Lady!!
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:12 PM
hockeygoalie29's Avatar
hockeygoalie29 hockeygoalie29 is offline
Healer
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chesapeake Beach, MD
Posts: 3,066
Default

A healthy Coles is a definate candidate for a #1 reciever. An unhealty Coles still is our best bet on the current roster. My best case scenerio would be to pick up either Porter as a free agent or Mike Williams in the draft. That would give us two recievers who need to be double teamed, basically a #1a and #1b.

By taking up 4 defenders together, that only leaves 7 for the rest of the offense. At that point you would have Cooley and either McCants/Jacobs in a one on one situation with a nickle back or linebacker leaving only 5 men in the box to defend Portis. By spreading the defense out that much there would always be something open.
__________________
Living the family life at my new house in Calvert County!
Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:13 PM
LATrueRedskin's Avatar
LATrueRedskin LATrueRedskin is offline
Great Spirit
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 13,572
Default

Coles is our number 1.
__________________

"Some people try to find things in this game that don't exist. Football is only two things - blocking and tackling." - Vince Lombardi
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old 12-15-2004, 04:27 PM
openallnight's Avatar
openallnight openallnight is offline
Warrior
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 2,534
Default

Coles is definately our #1 WR and would be on most nfl rosters.
I can't believe ALL this talk about picking up a WR. If we bypass Offensive and Defensive Lines and draft a WR in the 1st round I'll throw up.
__________________
WE ARE REDSKINS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |