What are you looking for against the Bears?

[markrc99]

JsMaViSd:

Thanks & I agree! Or, I certainly hope that they scrap dropping Orakpo into coverage. If they scheme Orakpo in a manner where he has cover responsibility when he sees something in particular, well, every time the opposing offense wants him out of there, guess what they'll do? They'll show him whatever he needs to see! For instance, if on film the opposition sees that every time someone drags their primary across the formation in motion, that triggers Orakpo to drop into coverage, then that's an easy way to get him blocked.

I've never liked that stuff. Drop your pass rusher & send somebody else. The concept isn't to improve your cover or your pass rush. It's a gimmick, you hope to confuse either the QB or the OL. The plan isn't the beat the opponent, but rather to trick them. It looks genius when it works and really stupid when it doesn't.

[markrc99]

Moe wrote:

"Cedric Griffen (20) had Marshall on this play, not Wilson (26). Wilson plays almost exclusively at right CB. ... That D was a pressure set and I can only imagine Griffen sat down expecting Cutler to make the quick inside read, but the protection held and we saw the result. Griffen needs to play more conservativley if he can't stay with his man, but having inexperiened Hall, himself a gambler, over the top didn't help. IMO, they need to slide Hall inside on slot and find someone (Barnes, Crawford, Thompson) to take his LCB spot opposite Wilson."

I just went back & you're exactly right. The CB beaten on this play was Cedric Griffin, not Wilson! Thank you the correction... just don't make a habit of it...lol...just kidding man! 'preciate it!

[httr#1]

Hail guys ,
C Griffin got his you know what handed to him ,caught out of position more than once against the bears .

that what was part of the problem we fell behind in the first place.

HAIL to the REDSKINS!!!