Go Back   hailRedskins.com Fan Board > hailRedskins.com Fan Forums > the Cherokee Redskins Tribe

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Did you hear what JAWS said on ESPN Radio
  #1  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:21 AM
Skinsfan1906's Avatar
Skinsfan1906 Skinsfan1906 is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Fort Washington, Maryland
Posts: 1,561
Default Did you hear what JAWS said on ESPN Radio

Ron "Jaws" Jaworski was just interviewed on ESPN Radio. They talked about what the Redskins are going to do at the #5 pick in the draft.

Well, Jaws who said that he knows Gibbs well (from playing against him for years) and studying film, he believes that the Redskins will pick:


Kellen Winslow, TE Miami

He mentioned how important the H-Back is to Gibbs and that Winslow is a great fit for Gibbs. He went on to say that with our O-Line, "great" Receivers and Portis, that Brunell (and Ramsey) would have a field day, particularly if Winslow is selected, which he believes will happen. He also hinted that Winslow is a BEAST.

He didn't rule out selecting anyone else (i.e. Taylor, Udeze, etc.), but really has a "gut feeling" that this is the direction that the 'Skins are going. Thoughts...........
__________________
'SKINSFAN, no longer in BALTIMORE....but now residing in the greener pastures of PG County!!!!

Last edited by Skinsfan1906 : 04-07-2004 at 10:24 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:32 AM
RedskinRyan's Avatar
RedskinRyan RedskinRyan is offline
Great Spirit
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 14,104
Default

my order is this
1.)wilfork/tommie harris
2.)udeze/will smith
3.)winslow
4.)taylor

i'd be mad if we drafted taylor. i think he would be great, but we have many needs. i want winslow, but i think we have too many needs on the dline and no draft picks to fulfill them. but our offense would be scary good if we had winslow.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:36 AM
TexSkin's Avatar
TexSkin TexSkin is offline
Sagamore
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Brownsville,Texas
Posts: 7,103
Default

Well that all chnaged when the Postons became his agent imo. If I was the Skins I woudl stay away from the headache of the holdout that will surely come.
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:51 AM
SkinsCT's Avatar
SkinsCT SkinsCT is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexSkin
Well that all chnaged when the Postons became his agent imo. If I was the Skins I woudl stay away from the headache of the holdout that will surely come.
Agreed. A holdout is a 100% certainty if we draft a Poston-represented player that high. It's a shame.
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:56 AM
Skinsfan1906's Avatar
Skinsfan1906 Skinsfan1906 is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Fort Washington, Maryland
Posts: 1,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexSkin
Well that all chnaged when the Postons became his agent imo. If I was the Skins I woudl stay away from the headache of the holdout that will surely come.
Yeah, TexSkin, when I was listening to Jaws talking, I was thinking to myself that it sounds reasonable that the Skins would go after Winslow, however the Postons signing with him would be a major road block. I don't know if Jaws even considered the agents when talking about who we would select. I still would prefer Taylor (yep, I'm still on the Taylor bandwagon), however, if New England will make a BLOCK-BLUSTER trade with us (which has been rumored), then I would trade down and Grab Udeze AND Wilfolk or Harris.
__________________
'SKINSFAN, no longer in BALTIMORE....but now residing in the greener pastures of PG County!!!!
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 04-07-2004, 10:56 AM
SkinsKY's Avatar
SkinsKY SkinsKY is offline
Spirit
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 8,926
Default

Yadda Yadda. Nothing really new here. Drafting Winslow means that we'll just become the Chiefs and hope that nobody can outscore us. Not the best place to be.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 04-07-2004, 11:58 AM
REDMAN REDMAN is offline
Brave
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,266
Default

If we trade down to far we wont get a top D-lineman.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:08 PM
JoeDaSchmoe's Avatar
JoeDaSchmoe JoeDaSchmoe is offline
Great Spirit
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 10,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsKY
Yadda Yadda. Nothing really new here. Drafting Winslow means that we'll just become the Chiefs and hope that nobody can outscore us. Not the best place to be.
13-3 vs. 5-11. Which would you take?
__________________
My PTI-style "boys:"

Santana Moss
Colt Brennan
Anthony Montgomery
Fred Smoot
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:10 PM
akhhorus's Avatar
akhhorus akhhorus is offline
hR Staff Writer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Monty Burns County
Posts: 61,242
Default

I still dont think you can believe any info that is being put out there right now. Too close to the draft. Winslow wouldnt surprise me, but I think he might be taken by Arizona.
My top three possibilities:
1-Taylor
2-Harris/Wilfolk
3-Trade down and take a dlinemen
__________________
Thanks for everything Johnny White Guy.
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:30 PM
SkinsKY's Avatar
SkinsKY SkinsKY is offline
Spirit
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 8,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeDaSchmoe
13-3 vs. 5-11. Which would you take?
I would certainly take 13-3 but, (unless you've changed your stance) I think you would agree that we need help on defense. Even if we field the best offense in football, the chances are, we won't get to where we want to be without defense. It has bitten the Chiefs/Colts/Rams etc. You don't need the best offense to win games provided you have a good defense. I think we already have a good offense will all major components intact. Our defense however does not. I do not want to be like the Chiefs in that regard.
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:32 PM
ShaggySkins's Avatar
ShaggySkins ShaggySkins is offline
Healer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: UMD College Park
Posts: 3,664
Default

A holdout is a possiblity regardless of who the agent is. If Gibbs thinks Winslow is a potential pro bowler and can drastically improve this team I don't think they'll pass on him. Especially if they view him as the best player. And judging from what I've seen and heard about Winslow, he's not the type to sit in the dark and let his agents handle everything. Him and his dad will have a pretty large say in the contract negoitiatons. The Postons have typically held their clients in the dark regarding negotiations I don't think that'll be an issue because Winslow will have his nose in everything.
__________________
After years of predictions for the Skins I'm taking the Wait and See approach this season
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:48 PM
VTSkins897's Avatar
VTSkins897 VTSkins897 is offline
Runner
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 137
Default

i think you gotta look to the playmaker. by that i mean there's a good chance that winslow will improve the offense significantly. this is not to say that drafting DL or taylor wouldn't improve the defense, but would it be anything more than marginable? that's arguable. but i've jumped/joined every draftee bandwagon there is numerous times, so don't listen to me.
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old 04-07-2004, 12:48 PM
VTSkins897's Avatar
VTSkins897 VTSkins897 is offline
Runner
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 137
Default

i mean you heard the guy... he IS a "(flipping) soldier!"
Reply With Quote

We are going to take who we want regardless of agent
  #14  
Old 04-07-2004, 01:26 PM
lsuredskin's Avatar
lsuredskin lsuredskin is offline
Runner
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 249
Default We are going to take who we want regardless of agent

Don't be fooled by the whole anti-Poston thing. If they want KWll then the Skins will take him regardless of the Postons. The good thing about drafting a TE at #5 is that he would instantly be the highest paid TE in the league anyway, just on draft position.
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old 04-07-2004, 01:44 PM
akhhorus's Avatar
akhhorus akhhorus is offline
hR Staff Writer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Monty Burns County
Posts: 61,242
Default

KWII is a playmaker, but the Skins have Portis and Coles to be the playmakers on offense. The Skins could use a playmaker on Defense, and Taylor or Wilfolk could be that
__________________
Thanks for everything Johnny White Guy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 PM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |