 |
Grade the teams (ESPN) |
|
11-11-2004, 12:58 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montevideo, Uruguay
Posts: 4,626
|
|
Grade the teams (ESPN)
Sorry if this was already mentioned, but I just read it.
Halfway through the season, Skins get a D.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/flash/...ard/reportcard
Mostly Gibbs fault, says the writer.
Can't disagree completely, though. |
11-11-2004, 01:06 PM
|
|
Comanchero
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,510
|
|
Written by Fatboy Pastabelly, so it immediately loses any credibility in my book.
But thx for the link
|
11-11-2004, 01:06 PM
|
 |
Warrior
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 2,534
|
|
I would expect no less from putza-relli.
|
11-11-2004, 01:35 PM
|
|
Sachem
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berkeley
Posts: 2,722
|
|
I don't think a D is fair for an excellent defense, excellent special teams, and a damn good running game. I haven't been the most optimistic person on this board, but we deserve better than a D.
|
11-11-2004, 01:39 PM
|
 |
Firebuilder
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 298
|
|
D is for defense
__________________
GIMME MY ATV BACK!
|
11-11-2004, 02:54 PM
|
 |
Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,221
|
|
These writers can hang off of teams like the Giants and Vikings all they want, we'll see who can turn it on in the second half and who falls on their face. Let's start making some believers on Sunday.
|
11-11-2004, 03:32 PM
|
 |
Sentinel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,680
|
|
i love it pastabelly strikes again.....
of the three teams that the redskins have beat this year pastabelly gave each of them higher ratings....
what kind of sense does that make....
even Arizona got a higher grade than us??!?!?!?!?! damn pastabelly
and in a final shameful display of anti-redskin fever that pastabelly is know for he even gave the pittiful lowly 1-7 san francisco 49ers a higher grade...
this guy is on crack....the way that our defense is playing we at least deserve a C or a C+
|
11-11-2004, 03:40 PM
|
|
Comanchero
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,510
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by guinness4health
i love it pastabelly strikes again.....
of the three teams that the redskins have beat this year pastabelly gave each of them higher ratings....
what kind of sense does that make....
even Arizona got a higher grade than us??!?!?!?!?! damn pastabelly
and in a final shameful display of anti-redskin fever that pastabelly is know for he even gave the pittiful lowly 1-7 san francisco 49ers a higher grade...
this guy is on crack....the way that our defense is playing we at least deserve a C or a C+
|
DAMN YOU FAT-AND-SMELLY! |
11-11-2004, 05:16 PM
|
 |
Medicine Man
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond VA.
Posts: 4,647
|
|
The 'boys got a D to. I think we should have gotten a d+ or a C becuase our D is outstanding.
__________________
This is not an exit.
|
11-11-2004, 05:28 PM
|
 |
Warrior
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UMass via Bethesda
Posts: 2,561
|
|
Well you can't blame brunell because he's doing the best he can with his ability, so you have to blame the coach for keeping him in there.
|
11-11-2004, 07:17 PM
|
|
Hunter
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 445
|
|
You guys don't understand. The grades aren't strictly based on performance but on expectations and how well the team met them. People were predicting 9-7 at minimum, and since we're not looking to be on that path, and you can agree that the first half of the season was a disappointment, we get a D.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM. |
|
|
|
