Go Back   hailRedskins.com Fan Board > The hR Washington DC Sports Forum > Caps, Nats, and Bullets!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

My two cents on the Cropp/D.C./MLB issue
  #1  
Old 12-15-2004, 09:55 AM
Jero Jero is offline
Scalper
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 585
Default My two cents on the Cropp/D.C./MLB issue

I am concerned this morning about the fate of D.C. baseball. With everything that has taken place over the past 24 hours, i have a feeling MLB is going to pull out of the deal and threaten to move the team someplace else. But as much as i want baseball in D.C., i have always stated that the financing deal that Tony Williams and the MLB originally put forward was not a good one for the citry of D.C. whatsoever. Williams was so frightened about losing the Expos to another city that whatever MLB stated they wanted done he agreed to, including screwing the city in a stadium deal that financially never made sense from the get go. I always wondered what would happen if D.C. played a little hardball with MLB whether they could get a more plausible deal for the city, now i guess we'll see if that will happen. People can bad mouth Linda Cropp all they want and i agree the way she has gone about things in regards to this fianancing deal make her look incompetent, especially after standing on City Hall steps right next to Mayor Williams cheering right along with him the fact that baseball was returning to D.C. The point is, i have alot of friends who live in the city, most of whom LOVE baseball and would love to see the national pastime back in D.C., but NONE of whom think the stadium financing deal is good for the city. I have to say that i agree with them. You have to look at both sides of the coin here, we're all sports fans, but even in sports some things are just not plausible. If MLB wants to pack up and say "forget it", well SCREW THEM!! I think the recent steroid scandal has proven that the powers that be don't have a clue about what's in the best interest of the sport anyway. If they really CARE about having a team in D.C. (which would obviously be good for the sport) then they will try to work a new deal out with Williams and the city council.

Last edited by jerolight : 12-15-2004 at 09:58 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 12-15-2004, 10:58 AM
aREDSKIN aREDSKIN is offline
Papoose
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 65
Default

MLB should find another location. MLB and the city had a deal and everyone knew what the deal was. If DC wants to reneg on that t deal, for whatever reason, fine but don't blame MLB for the incompetence and flim flamming by the charlatrans in the DC gov't. I'd say to MLB go find a legit local city that really wants to have MLB and just forget about the yokels in DC.
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 12-15-2004, 11:07 AM
Jero Jero is offline
Scalper
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aREDSKIN
MLB should find another location. MLB and the city had a deal and everyone knew what the deal was. If DC wants to reneg on that t deal, for whatever reason, fine but don't blame MLB for the incompetence and flim flamming by the charlatrans in the DC gov't. I'd say to MLB go find a legit local city that really wants to have MLB and just forget about the yokels in DC.
I'm not going to disagree with you on the incompentence of the D.C. gov't, but the more i think about it, MLB is equally incompetent and trying to coax D.C. into a raw deal. The problem is that theuy just got called on it.69% of D.C.'s residents are opposed to any kind of public financing, according to a Washington Post poll a few weeks back. If anybody was doing the flim-flamming to start out with, it was MLB.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 12-15-2004, 11:13 AM
bfauble83's Avatar
bfauble83 bfauble83 is offline
Shaman
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wild, Wonderful West Virginia
Posts: 5,574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerolight
I'm not going to disagree with you on the incompentence of the D.C. gov't, but the more i think about it, MLB is equally incompetent and trying to coax D.C. into a raw deal. The problem is that theuy just got called on it.69% of D.C.'s residents are opposed to any kind of public financing, according to a Washington Post poll a few weeks back. If anybody was doing the flim-flamming to start out with, it was MLB.

Of course MLB is going to try to get the best deal in their interest, thats business. The DC Council agreed to it, then backed out...its all their fault IMO. If they didn't like the deal they should have negotiated earlier.
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 12-15-2004, 11:17 AM
dj_stouty's Avatar
dj_stouty dj_stouty is offline
Chief Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,573
Default

I guarantee you not a single school or hospital will be saved if MLB takes their team elsewhere.

I don't buy the argument that "the money should be used towards the city". The DC city council has been mismanaging funds for a long time. NOW...all of a sudden, we are to believe they will turn things around? If it was so important to the council, why haven't they ALREADY been funding schools or saving hospitals?

Too little too late, IMO. Most of the tax burden will be towards area businesses anyway. PLUS, lets not forget the hundreds or thousands of jobs that will be created once the ball park is erected...as well as the need for jobs for new restaurants, parking garages and area attractions.

I'm not absconding Mayor Williams of fault here. He shouldn't have made an agreement with MLB unless he had full backing of the council.
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 12-15-2004, 11:27 AM
aREDSKIN aREDSKIN is offline
Papoose
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 65
Default

Boswell nails it.



By Thomas Boswell

Wednesday, December 15, 2004; Page D01

Late Tuesday night, in the 11th hour of a marathon D.C. Council meeting, chairman Linda W. Cropp blew to smithereens the deal that MLB thought it had in place with Washington to build a ballpark on the Anacostia waterfront. With that single blow, which leaves baseball no alternatives, the return of major league baseball to the nation's capital is now dead.

The bits of charred ash and shattered fragments that you see falling from the sky are the remnants of the destruction that Cropp wrought. With one amendment to a stadium-funding bill, she demolished the most basic pillar on which the District's agreement with baseball was built. By a 10-3 vote, the council demanded that at least half of the cost of any new stadium be built with private financing, which does not exist, rather than public funding, as stipulated in D.C.'s deal with baseball.

A stadium in search of hypothetical funding, funding that may never be found, is not a stadium at all. It is just a convenient political lie. The entire purpose of baseball's long search for a new home for the Expos was so the sport could sell the team. Who is going to buy a team to play in a stadium that isn't funded and may never be? Nobody. Nobody on earth.

Now, thanks to Cropp, baseball's entire motive for moving the ex-Expos to Washington -- to sell the team -- has been erased. Any solid deal in any town is now better than what Washington is offering -- which is nothing.

The question of whether baseball will now jerk its franchise out of Washington is not a question at all. It is a foregone conclusion. Why would baseball come here? We have pulled a bait-and-switch on the sport. We have broken a deal negotiated by Mayor Anthony A. Williams, the city's highest elected official. And worst of all, Cropp and her council didn't have the guts to stand up and say: "This stadium is too good a deal for baseball and not good enough for the District. You tied poor Mayor Williams in a knot. We're not approving such a lousy ballpark deal. We reject it. Take your team somewhere else."

That's a defensible position. It may be right or wrong. But those are the kind of decisions a city's council should make.

Instead, Cropp and her crowd want to hide their true intentions so they will not have "They Killed Baseball" signs nailed to their political backs. But that's what they did. And that's who they are.

Cropp doesn't want to leave fingerprints. Instead, she wants to leave the impression that she was merely trying to save the District money. Instead, she has now cost it a team and all the benefits of development in Southeast that it might have ignited.

"I do not want to do the public financing of this deal at this level," said Cropp. "I am not sure how baseball will react. But without this piece [of the legislation] I will not vote for this agreement."

Oh, she knows how baseball will react. It'll go ballistic. Will the sport want to come to Washington badly enough to put up with what council member Jack Evans, the point man throughout negotiations, called "a complete violation of our deal"?

In our dreams. The Nationals are gone. That didn't take long, did it? Save those hats with the tilted 'W' on the front. They'll be collectors' items before the week is over. Only a miracle could save Washington's deal with baseball now. Cropp killed it. Whether she did it out of civic conscience, as she claims, or pique, or political aspiration or simply -- and this is a possibility -- a general ignorance of the waters in which she was swimming, is a question for the future.

Right now, the entire baseball-for-Washington scene is in chaos and confusion.

Apparently, hell hath no fury like Cropp when she feels that she has been spurned by baseball. Earlier in the day, she contacted baseball about adding a clause to the stadium bill that would have capped the District's possible damages at $19 million a year if the park was not finished on time. She didn't like the answer she got which was basically, "A deal is a deal."

"I received a letter from baseball that was not a good faith effort," said an annoyed Cropp.

"I don't like a farce being played," said council member Carol Schwartz. "What [baseball told Cropp] was just a regurgitation of what they have said before."

In other words, baseball wouldn't negotiate with Cropp and her council beyond a certain fairly minimal point.

But why should they? To baseball, what Cropp has done is the purest form of business deceit. Let the mayor put an acceptable stadium offer on the table, complete with fully negotiated concessions on both sides, then, at the council level say, "Now let's renegotiate everything."

Baseball feels no obligation whatsoever to make a good faith effort to negotiate with Cropp's council. It already negotiated for two years with cities all over America that wanted the Expos to come to their town. The universal assumption was that the representatives of those cities -- such as Mayor Williams -- had the authority to speak for their towns and already had the backing and understanding of their city councils.

Obviously, Williams didn't. Cropp, who has aspirations to be mayor, has stunned Williams time and again. Last week, when asked if he had Cropp's final and solid support, he shook his head and said, "With her, who knows?"

The first person on the line to Commissioner Bud Selig may be Peter Angelos. As soon as he stops laughing, Angelos can assure the commissioner that, if he drops Washington like a hot potato, the Baltimore Orioles' owner will no longer feel the need to sue MLB.

Did Cropp fully comprehend what she was doing? Or was she simply out of her league? Bet on the former. She was told.

"What our city guaranteed baseball was that the city would build a new stadium -- that we would get it built. That was the essential thing to Major League Baseball. They want to sell the team," said Evans. "Tomorrow morning baseball can't sell that team. No owner would have certainty about a new stadium. That was always the fundamental issue in our deal."

Those who believe in the power of baseball prayer had better get to work. Because baseball would have to be run by saints -- not 30 owners -- to respond to this national insult, a direct spit in the face, by saying: "Okay, let's talk. Let's save the deal. We've already negotiated the big stuff. But now we'll negotiate it again."

Anything is possible. Maybe cows will fly soon, too.

In the end, the District, through its council, has shown that it does not want baseball -- at least not baseball in the real world. Cropp and her council are only comfortable playing fantasy baseball.

"If you wanted to kill the deal, why didn't you do it this morning?" council member Harold Brazil said after 10 p.m. "This is like 30 years of work for naught."

It's easier to do dark deeds late at night.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2004Dec14.html
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 12-15-2004, 12:30 PM
hail2skins's Avatar
hail2skins hail2skins is offline
hR Owner
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,970
Default

Here's another article that puts blame on both Williams and Cropp. Cropp for her underhanded pull of the deal and Williams for not keeping the council involved.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Dec15.html
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 12-15-2004, 12:31 PM
hail2skins's Avatar
hail2skins hail2skins is offline
hR Owner
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dj_stouty
I guarantee you not a single school or hospital will be saved if MLB takes their team elsewhere.

I don't buy the argument that "the money should be used towards the city". The DC city council has been mismanaging funds for a long time. NOW...all of a sudden, we are to believe they will turn things around? If it was so important to the council, why haven't they ALREADY been funding schools or saving hospitals?

Too little too late, IMO. Most of the tax burden will be towards area businesses anyway. PLUS, lets not forget the hundreds or thousands of jobs that will be created once the ball park is erected...as well as the need for jobs for new restaurants, parking garages and area attractions.

I'm not absconding Mayor Williams of fault here. He shouldn't have made an agreement with MLB unless he had full backing of the council.
I just had this exact argument at lunch today.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 12-15-2004, 12:39 PM
BRAVEONAWARPATH's Avatar
BRAVEONAWARPATH BRAVEONAWARPATH is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 1,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dj_stouty
I guarantee you not a single school or hospital will be saved if MLB takes their team elsewhere.

I don't buy the argument that "the money should be used towards the city". The DC city council has been mismanaging funds for a long time. NOW...all of a sudden, we are to believe they will turn things around? If it was so important to the council, why haven't they ALREADY been funding schools or saving hospitals?
You are absolutely right stouty. What people seem not to understand
is that there is no money for hospitals etc. The funds are/were
being raised for the express purpose of constructing a stadium. Is the
deal weighted heavily in baseball's favor? Yes! But sometimes you have to pay to play.

And it's not like the money is coming from the average tax payers. From what I understand, taxes will be imposed upon buisnesses generating annual revenues in excess of 4 million dollars. Like I said,
it's not a great deal but MLB is a buisness and those were the
parameters that were set.

Last edited by BRAVEONAWARPATH : 12-15-2004 at 12:48 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 12-15-2004, 12:43 PM
LATrueRedskin's Avatar
LATrueRedskin LATrueRedskin is offline
Great Spirit
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 13,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dj_stouty
I guarantee you not a single school or hospital will be saved if MLB takes their team elsewhere.

I don't buy the argument that "the money should be used towards the city". The DC city council has been mismanaging funds for a long time. NOW...all of a sudden, we are to believe they will turn things around? If it was so important to the council, why haven't they ALREADY been funding schools or saving hospitals?

Too little too late, IMO. Most of the tax burden will be towards area businesses anyway. PLUS, lets not forget the hundreds or thousands of jobs that will be created once the ball park is erected...as well as the need for jobs for new restaurants, parking garages and area attractions.

I'm not absconding Mayor Williams of fault here. He shouldn't have made an agreement with MLB unless he had full backing of the council.
I agree. Great post. And Boswell did nail this situation in his column today.
__________________

"Some people try to find things in this game that don't exist. Football is only two things - blocking and tackling." - Vince Lombardi
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old 12-15-2004, 12:48 PM
SkinsKY's Avatar
SkinsKY SkinsKY is offline
Spirit
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 8,928
Default

Agreed with the sentiments in this thread. It may cost money to build a stadium, but nothing generates revenue like pro sports. Pay now and you can reap these benefits for decades. No deal should've been made without council approval, but I imagine both sides are trying to push for an agreement that meets their interests best.
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 12-15-2004, 12:52 PM
LATrueRedskin's Avatar
LATrueRedskin LATrueRedskin is offline
Great Spirit
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 13,572
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsKY
Agreed with the sentiments in this thread. It may cost money to build a stadium, but nothing generates revenue like pro sports. Pay now and you can reap these benefits for decades. No deal should've been made without council approval, but I imagine both sides are trying to push for an agreement that meets their interests best.
Especially Major League Baseball. that's 80-something games that could bring in millions upon millions of dollars.
__________________

"Some people try to find things in this game that don't exist. Football is only two things - blocking and tackling." - Vince Lombardi
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old 12-15-2004, 01:36 PM
Jero Jero is offline
Scalper
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 585
Default

Well, regardless of everyone's opinion, one thing is almost certain. Baseball in D.C. is dead in the water. Wow, that was a whole lot of getting worked up over nothing! I'm depressed...
Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old 12-15-2004, 02:13 PM
BRAVEONAWARPATH's Avatar
BRAVEONAWARPATH BRAVEONAWARPATH is offline
Comanchero
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Olney, MD
Posts: 1,590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerolight
Well, regardless of everyone's opinion, one thing is almost certain. Baseball in D.C. is dead in the water. Wow, that was a whole lot of getting worked up over nothing! I'm depressed...
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old 12-15-2004, 03:20 PM
split3clemente's Avatar
split3clemente split3clemente is offline
Brave
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: silver spring
Posts: 1,246
Default

somewhere peter angelos is smiling, and that makes me wanna hurl cause i hate that bama sooooo bad
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 PM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |