CarMikes Pos. Preview Thread: QBs

CarMike · #1 07-10-2003, 08:44 AM

Guys, hR will be beginning a new series of threads and articals leading up to the beginning of Training Camp. Today, we start off with the QB position.

We already know who will be the #1 QB heading into training camp. Mr. Patrick Ramsey. It seems like a lot of outsiders aren't that impressed with Ramsey. They will be surprised at the type of QB he'll become. He has poise, a very strong arm, and he seems ready to take the next step. Articles have said that he's determined to succeed. He also has what it takes to get to the next level.......dedication. He's hitting the play book and working very hard.

Rob Johnson has the #2 position pretty much to himself. I didn't like this pickup during the offseason. The only move our FO made that I didn't care for. I would have been just as happy keeping Danny Wuerffel as the #2. There really isn't a large difference in skill between those two.

Now, here is where things get tricky. Who makes the team as the #3 QB? The rookie QB who we drafted in the 7th round, Gibran Hamdam? Or, do we decide to go with the undrafted QB in Brad Banks?

There ya go guys. Our first hR position preview. PennSkinsFan has wrote a article more in depth. Here's the link. hR hopes you like this idea as we want to be the Redskins best MB for original content.

http://www.hailredskins.com/QBPositionalReview.htm

dj_stouty · #2 07-10-2003, 08:53 AM

Great Article!

CarMike · #3 07-10-2003, 09:04 AM

I think Banks will win the 3rd QB position. If he doesn't make the team as the #3 QB, he'll find a spot on the team somewhere. Could he become the Redskins version Pittsburghs Randel El?

PennSkinsFan · #4 07-10-2003, 09:17 AM

As the writer, I specified my position ont he third qb spot. Hamdam will most likely win the job. He wa sdrafted over Banks because he impressed Spurrier in private parctices. His size and arm strength make him attractive to this offense. Regardless, both will be project and most likely leave the NFL at some point in there careers as career third string QBs, but I think Spurrier may see soemthing in Hamdam, and that is why he was a surprise pick.

TexSkin · #5 07-10-2003, 09:43 AM

Great article!! I am one of those that thinks Banks will get the 3rd QB spot and Hadman will be in PS. I just feel he is too raw and it will show in preseason.

Hailyeah · #6 07-10-2003, 10:13 AM

I also hated the Johnson signing. I believe O'Donnell and Petersen and a couple other better guys were out there at the time. Inevitably, there will be quarters or games during the season where we'll need a competent backup. Hopefully Johnson embraces his role and can handle the relief pitcher role better this year than last when he looked awful a few times subbing for Brad Johnson in TB. Especially that Steeler MNF game where he held onto the ball and got mauled several times in a row. Yikes.

As for the third QB, I don't have a strong opinion. Actually, I'd like to bring Wuerffel back for that spot. Wasn't that still a possibility? One of the other two guys can go on the practice squad. Neither will make an impact this year or in the future IMO.

PennSkinsFan · #7 07-10-2003, 10:37 AM

Heck be totally truthful, I woudl have rather had Ken Graham return than Ron Johnson, but I guess we will see how it goes.

CarMike · #8 07-10-2003, 11:15 AM

What is the deal with D. Wuerffel? Is he on another team? Or do we still have him on our roster?

I believe he's a free agent. Just not sure..

#9 07-10-2003, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by CarMike
We already know who will be the #1 QB heading into training camp. Mr. Patrick Ramsey. It seems like a lot of outsiders aren't that impressed with Ramsey. They will be surprised at the type of QB he'll become.

Or we will be disappointed. One thing I notice living miles away from any redskin propaganda is that there is always something good to say about every player that the skins ever had. I still have my doubts about Ramsey, but I think the system can make him good. When everyone in the world sees one thing, they may be more right than we are. (just a small observation..hopefully he'll be a stud and we can say "nah, nah, nah, nah"

Quote:

He has poise, a very strong arm, and he seems ready to take the next step.

Only by default...I hope we don't have to look for a stud qb come next offseason.

Quote:

Rob Johnson has the #2 position pretty much to himself. I didn't like this pickup during the offseason. The only move our FO made that I didn't care for. I would have been just as happy keeping Danny Wuerffel as the #2. There really isn't a large difference in skill between those two.

I completely agree...and Danny never really had a shot. He played well in one of the games he started with 3 td's...and he was a massive stud in preseason leading the country in passer rating, yet matthews got the nod.

Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

Quote:

Now, here is where things get tricky. Who makes the team as the #3 QB? The rookie QB who we drafted in the 7th round, Gibran Hamdam? Or, do we decide to go with the undrafted QB in Brad Banks?

BANKS! You can't teach the athleticism. Hamdam only has an arm...he will never (I repeat) NEVER be a even a decent NFL qb. There aer plenty of guys with arms in the world, this guy is not a player. Banks was second in the Heisman for a reason...if you're going to work with someone...work with him. He needs a little seasoning, but he could become a flutie, someone like him.

Skinzaholic · #10 07-10-2003, 02:01 PM

Quote:

BANKS! You can't teach the athleticism. Hamdam only has an arm...he will never (I repeat) NEVER be a even a decent NFL qb. There aer plenty of guys with arms in the world, this guy is not a player. Banks was second in the Heisman for a reason...if you're going to work with someone...work with him. He needs a little seasoning, but he could become a flutie, someone like him.

I agree here. NBanks has more overall athleti ability... and this league dictates QBs like that. I think he may be a surprise in the future. I hope anway.

TexSkin · #11 07-10-2003, 02:01 PM

Ok now I find myself agreeing with you jsarno....what is this Bizzaro board?

Chief Seeway · #12 07-10-2003, 09:46 PM

I like the Rob Johnson signing. He is a veteran with starting experience. He will be an asset on the sidelines and in the locker room. In any chain of command (sorry for the military in me coming out) a person needs a mentor who is not a supervisor (coach). Johnson has far more field and camp time then Woe-ful and he will be a quality back-up. Now, on the flip side. If the "mentor" relationship doesnt evolve, shame on PR and RJ. It should.

rskinsfan10 · #13 07-10-2003, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by seeway
I like the Rob Johnson signing. He is a veteran with starting experience. He will be an asset on the sidelines and in the locker room. In any chain of command (sorry for the military in me coming out) a person needs a mentor who is not a supervisor (coach). Johnson has far more field and camp time then Woe-ful and he will be a quality back-up. Now, on the flip side. If the "mentor" relationship doesnt evolve, shame on PR and RJ. It should.

I totally agree with you.

PennSkinsFan · #14 07-11-2003, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by seeway
I like the Rob Johnson signing. He is a veteran with starting experience. He will be an asset on the sidelines and in the locker room. In any chain of command (sorry for the military in me coming out) a person needs a mentor who is not a supervisor (coach). Johnson has far more field and camp time then Woe-ful and he will be a quality back-up. Now, on the flip side. If the "mentor" relationship doesnt evolve, shame on PR and RJ. It should.

I agree with the conetnof your post, but not the personnell. I woudl have preferred just to see Wuerffel or Graham. Heck, I guess I am partial to Graham. I remember two years ago when he had to come in and sub for Banks and he ended up whipping up Denver.

#15 07-11-2003, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by seeway
I like the Rob Johnson signing. He is a veteran with starting experience. He will be an asset on the sidelines and in the locker room. In any chain of command (sorry for the military in me coming out) a person needs a mentor who is not a supervisor (coach). Johnson has far more field and camp time then Woe-ful and he will be a quality back-up. Now, on the flip side. If the "mentor" relationship doesnt evolve, shame on PR and RJ. It should.

I disagree here. Johnson will not be a whole lot of a benefit in the Spurrier offense. Fact is Ramsey would be teaching Johnson. Johnson is not a smart veteran, just because you've been around the league for a few years doesn't mean you know what you're doing. (sorry...I see Johnson as an idiot)
Danny Wuerffel knows the system...even if you think he sucks on the field...he can teach the system. The "chemistry" key comes in here..and Johnson will hurt us more than help us.