 |
Pete Prisco Worst mock ever |
|
04-27-2007, 09:52 AM
|
 |
Brave
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Upper Marlboro MD
Posts: 1,102
|
|
Pete Prisco Worst mock ever
Wow what an idiot
I've seen more mocks then I can count and this is by far the worst I've seen yet. Its like he picked names from a hat.
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10149382 |
04-27-2007, 09:58 AM
|
 |
hR Staff Writer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Monty Burns County
Posts: 61,242
|
|
Its a good idea by Prisco, but horribly botched.
__________________
Thanks for everything Johnny White Guy.
|
04-27-2007, 10:12 AM
|
 |
Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 9,204
|
|
It has some bad picks, but i dont think its as bad as you say it is.
Granted the Nelson/Revis/Pitscelli(sp?) picks are beyond me. The rest is at least somewhat plausible.
__________________
|
04-27-2007, 10:30 AM
|
 |
Brave
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: play ground on the potomac
Posts: 1,259
|
|
looks like he was predicting who he personaly thought the teams should take,not who with get drafted by the teams.
__________________
shoot low they may be crawling
|
04-27-2007, 10:37 AM
|
 |
Grumpy Old Man
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: new orleans, now the palm springs of washington
Posts: 57,558
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by remaxjon
|
meh... mixed bag.. some good ideas and some not so good..
__________________
|
04-27-2007, 10:50 AM
|
 |
Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,732
|
|
I'm going to go out on a limb and say my mock draft about 2 months ago (i think) was better than his.
__________________
|
04-27-2007, 05:58 PM
|
|
Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: hagerstown,maryland
Posts: 9,215
|
|
not a very good mock for an expert
__________________
twitter handle=skinsfanjw21
2013 draft wishlist 2nd-alford 3rd-rambo/swearinger 4th-stedman bailey 5th-mcgee and ace sanders 6th-jakar hamilton 7th-bpa
|
04-27-2007, 06:12 PM
|
 |
Sachem
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NW DC
Posts: 2,874
|
|
If the Cardinals choose Peterson at no. 5 they should be very embarrassed of themselves. To pay Edge that kind of money in FA and then to turn around and draft another RB the next year. This doesn't even begin to explain how ineffective all the skill players they add will be with that "line." If Thomas really does go at 4, they need to trade down to grab Brown or draft a defensive player at 5.
__________________
Fire Vinny!
This is nothing more than a hunch but I think Malcolm Kelly will be a star in this league. (post 2008 draft prediction)
|
04-27-2007, 06:44 PM
|
 |
Sachem
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: OC, MD
Posts: 2,766
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AliBabba
If the Cardinals choose Peterson at no. 5 they should be very embarrassed of themselves. To pay Edge that kind of money in FA and then to turn around and draft another RB the next year. This doesn't even begin to explain how ineffective all the skill players they add will be with that "line." If Thomas really does go at 4, they need to trade down to grab Brown or draft a defensive player at 5.
|
Yea, that's pretty random, especially with their lack of O-line. They gave up 34 sacks and were 31st in the NFL in rushing with 1338 yards. I don't think edge was their rushing problem. |
04-27-2007, 07:36 PM
|
 |
Buck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 814
|
|
i just threw up a little inside
__________________
Now where did I put that panic button....
|
|
Expert? |
|
04-28-2007, 10:38 AM
|
|
Healer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,618
|
|
Expert?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skinsfan36
not a very good mock for an expert
|
Let's see - isn't this the guy that misses on Monk for HOF? He's no expert, he is paid for pandering to the nations biggest market. And he doesn't know it (look at the NY picks). |
04-28-2007, 03:40 PM
|
 |
Runner
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Glenn Dale,MD
Posts: 183
|
|
this guy gets 4 picks correct
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 PM. |
|
|
|
