 |
FOX Calls '04 for Bush |
 |

09-04-2003, 01:19 PM
|
 |
Great Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C.
Posts: 23,823
|
|
FOX Calls '04 for Bush
Victory! FOX News calls 2004 presidential election for Bush
August 16, 2003
FNC reporting that President Bush has defeated the yet-to-be-named Democratic nominee in the November 2, 2004 election
Washington — FOX News called the 2004 presidential election for George W. Bush today in a controversial move by the network’s “We Decide ‘04” desk. The decision by FOX to break the news has put the network far ahead of their competition on the story, as other media sources said they wouldn’t announce the winner of the election for at least another year.
The archaic practice of waiting for official precinct results before announcing the winner of an election has been abandoned in recent years by news organizations, who have found that simply calling elections based on their own desires translates into better ratings.
“Television viewers aren’t concerned with the details like complicated numbers or harsh reality,” FOX News head Roger Ailes said. “They want something clean cut. They want to know who won, who lost, who got shot today, and which black man they should be afraid of.”
As President Bush and his supporters celebrated their hard-earned victory, they knew that MSNBC or CNN might try to insist that the race is “still too close to call.”
“Waiting for the actual voters to make their actual selections is a cop-out,” FOX personality Bill O’Reilly said. “Voters are human, they make mistakes! They can’t be trusted to anything this important. The work of our experts at the ‘We Decide’ desk is completely fool-proof and incapable of error.”
The call by FOX News wasn’t surprising to media insiders, who said the development was an extension of what happened during the last Presidential election. FOX News’ 2000 election coverage was directed by George W. Bush’s cousin John Ellis, who decided to announce a Bush victory in Florida when all data pointed otherwise.
Media critics charged that the anchor who made today’s call on FOX, Barbara Bush, may be biased in her reporting.
|
 |

09-04-2003, 03:02 PM
|
 |
Medicine Man
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,985
|
|
__________________
Hibachi!
|
 |
Re: FOX Calls '04 for Bush |
 |

09-05-2003, 11:05 AM
|
 |
Great Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 40° 57' 49" N / 91° 33' 29" W
Posts: 21,156
|
|
Re: FOX Calls '04 for Bush
Quote:
Originally posted by Spence
Victory! FOX News calls 2004 presidential election for Bush
August 16, 2003
FNC reporting that President Bush has defeated the yet-to-be-named Democratic nominee in the November 2, 2004 election
Washington — FOX News called the 2004 presidential election for George W. Bush today in a controversial move by the network’s “We Decide ‘04” desk. The decision by FOX to break the news has put the network far ahead of their competition on the story, as other media sources said they wouldn’t announce the winner of the election for at least another year.
The archaic practice of waiting for official precinct results before announcing the winner of an election has been abandoned in recent years by news organizations, who have found that simply calling elections based on their own desires translates into better ratings.
“Television viewers aren’t concerned with the details like complicated numbers or harsh reality,” FOX News head Roger Ailes said. “They want something clean cut. They want to know who won, who lost, who got shot today, and which black man they should be afraid of.”
As President Bush and his supporters celebrated their hard-earned victory, they knew that MSNBC or CNN might try to insist that the race is “still too close to call.”
“Waiting for the actual voters to make their actual selections is a cop-out,” FOX personality Bill O’Reilly said. “Voters are human, they make mistakes! They can’t be trusted to anything this important. The work of our experts at the ‘We Decide’ desk is completely fool-proof and incapable of error.”
The call by FOX News wasn’t surprising to media insiders, who said the development was an extension of what happened during the last Presidential election. FOX News’ 2000 election coverage was directed by George W. Bush’s cousin John Ellis, who decided to announce a Bush victory in Florida when all data pointed otherwise.
Media critics charged that the anchor who made today’s call on FOX, Barbara Bush, may be biased in her reporting.
|
Do you sit around and think of stuff like this to post?
__________________
A buffalo herd can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo & those are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole because the health of the herd keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. Similarly, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Intake of alcohol, killing the slowest & weakest brain cells first, makes the brain a faster, more efficient machine. That's why you always feel smarter after a few beers.
|
 |
 |
Re: FOX Calls '04 for Bush |
 |

09-07-2003, 12:00 AM
|
|
Papoose
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas city
Posts: 43
|
|
Re: FOX Calls '04 for Bush
Quote:
Originally posted by Spence
Victory! FOX News calls 2004 presidential election for Bush
August 16, 2003
FNC reporting that President Bush has defeated the yet-to-be-named Democratic nominee in the November 2, 2004 election
Washington — FOX News called the 2004 presidential election for George W. Bush today in a controversial move by the network’s “We Decide ‘04” desk. The decision by FOX to break the news has put the network far ahead of their competition on the story, as other media sources said they wouldn’t announce the winner of the election for at least another year.
The archaic practice of waiting for official precinct results before announcing the winner of an election has been abandoned in recent years by news organizations, who have found that simply calling elections based on their own desires translates into better ratings.
“Television viewers aren’t concerned with the details like complicated numbers or harsh reality,” FOX News head Roger Ailes said. “They want something clean cut. They want to know who won, who lost, who got shot today, and which black man they should be afraid of.”
As President Bush and his supporters celebrated their hard-earned victory, they knew that MSNBC or CNN might try to insist that the race is “still too close to call.”
“Waiting for the actual voters to make their actual selections is a cop-out,” FOX personality Bill O’Reilly said. “Voters are human, they make mistakes! They can’t be trusted to anything this important. The work of our experts at the ‘We Decide’ desk is completely fool-proof and incapable of error.”
The call by FOX News wasn’t surprising to media insiders, who said the development was an extension of what happened during the last Presidential election. FOX News’ 2000 election coverage was directed by George W. Bush’s cousin John Ellis, who decided to announce a Bush victory in Florida when all data pointed otherwise.
Media critics charged that the anchor who made today’s call on FOX, Barbara Bush, may be biased in her reporting.
|
I thought it was Gore who was called on Florida a 1 and a half before the pallets closed in the pan handle. That was fact, along with the hundreds of recounts before and after that election.
To bad Gore couldn't even carry is own state, then the debate would be over. Wouldn't it?
Hey the Nation is still waiting for a issue to vote for your side on. Let use all know when we have a better option than Vote for me because Bush is this and that. Sorry man but you must be in fantasyland if you think your guys can win after all the lieing and crap your man put us through. Yeah trust you issueless people because Bush is so bad and you guys deserve trust. Whatever
Stock up on tissue, you will need it.
|
 |

10-01-2003, 01:57 AM
|
 |
Scalper
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 717
|
|
Spence I watch Fox News all the time and I really have no idea what you're talking about.
__________________
erp
|

10-01-2003, 10:30 AM
|
|
|
it's a funny quote! But true!
Now there is this "The Bush Administration ratted out an employee" crap.
The democrats don't even realize the hole they are placing for themselves. Oh well...I don't really care.
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM. |
|
|
|