Some good news

[IH Brave]

Originally Posted by BraveHeartFan

Better hope that in that top 5 position that they don't saddle your team with a big contract to Jimmy Clausen or Sam Bradford. That would be horrible for you cause I really think they both are going to suck in the NFL.

I think Sam Bradford will be good. However there's no point in the Redskins bringing him in with no O-line.

[SkinsGuru77]

Originally Posted by IH Brave

I think Sam Bradford will be good. However there's no point in the Redskins bringing him in with no O-line.

+1 it would be re-run of David Carr. look at him and campbell, they both have been so beat up that they will never be a viable QB in this league because if a mouse farts they hear a D-Lineman comming to crush them

I too think Sam Bradford will be good, maybe even great but you have to build inside out in this league and thats starts with our Lines.

[lorimike]

Originally Posted by IH Brave

I think Sam Bradford will be good. However there's no point in the Redskins bringing him in with no O-line.

<<<

No point in starting him if we draft him until we get a better offensive line. Start Campbell if we keep him or some other retread. we are going to suck for at least two more years.

[lorimike]

Originally Posted by cal_junior

Why are people interested in a defensive lineman? We need offensive line help worse than anything, people:

<<<

We need offensive lineman. No one disagrees with that. But with where we are picking we cannot afford to screw it up. If Suh is there we should take him. Griffin won't be here for very long. Before we know it Hanyesworth will not be a cap friendly player. Other than TE there isn't a position on the team that doesn't need an upgrade. Maybe with an uncapped year we can get this teams salary situation straightened out.

[Fathead]

Originally Posted by lorimike

<<<

We need offensive lineman. No one disagrees with that. But with where we are picking we cannot afford to screw it up. If Suh is there we should take him. Griffin won't be here for very long. Before we know it Hanyesworth will not be a cap friendly player. Other than TE there isn't a position on the team that doesn't need an upgrade. Maybe with an uncapped year we can get this teams salary situation straightened out.

I want us to take nothing but OL, but if Suh is there then we'd be retarded not to take him. Our D (assuming we hire someone who likes pressure) would be sick.

[Skaggsrules]

Haynesworth, Suh, Orakpo, and Carter....Blanche would still not rush the passer

[smoak]

Originally Posted by Skaggsrules

Haynesworth, Suh, Orakpo, and Carter....Blanche would still not rush the passer

Thankfully Blache is buried in about a week.

[hogs86]

So as now we have the #5 pick.

December 29, 2009

(F indicates coin flip required to break tie; Note opposition W-L % based on all 16 opponents this season)

#
Team
W-L
Opp W-L %

1 St. Louis 1-14.525

2 Detroit 2-13 .517

3 Kansas City 3-12 .521

4Tampa Bay 3-12 .558

5 Washington 4-11 .500

6 Cleveland 4-11 .504

7 Seattle 5-10 .475

8 Buffalo 5-10 .517

9 Oakland 5-10 .521

10 Denver (from Chicago) 6-9 .492

11 San Francisco 7-8 .483

[Taylor21TheUndertaker]

KC could win

[MadDog97]

Originally Posted by lorimike

<<<

We need offensive lineman. No one disagrees with that. But with where we are picking we cannot afford to screw it up. If Suh is there we should take him. Griffin won't be here for very long. Before we know it Hanyesworth will not be a cap friendly player. Other than TE there isn't a position on the team that doesn't need an upgrade. Maybe with an uncapped year we can get this teams salary situation straightened out.

I don't care if the reincarnation of Deacon Jones is available, we need to draft an offensive tackle and then a guard with our first two picks. Our D needs a philosophy change primarily. Carter and Orakpor are fine as end rushers and Jarmon will return next year. Let Haynesworth loose and you get inside pressure. Assuming Horton returns OK, the safety position is covered and if our future QB has time Devin Thomas, Moss, and Kelly will see dramatic improvement. The only other position would be OLB with the second pick so Orakpor becomes a full time down lineman.

We could trade down for more picks, but still focus on the OL. Then again, I have been making this arguement for years.

[IH Brave]

Originally Posted by hogs86

So as now we have the #5 pick.

December 29, 2009

(F indicates coin flip required to break tie; Note opposition W-L % based on all 16 opponents this season)

#
Team
W-L
Opp W-L %

1 St. Louis 1-14.525

2 Detroit 2-13 .517

3 Kansas City 3-12 .521

4Tampa Bay 3-12 .558

5 Washington 4-11 .500

6 Cleveland 4-11 .504

7 Seattle 5-10 .475

8 Buffalo 5-10 .517

9 Oakland 5-10 .521

10 Denver (from Chicago) 6-9 .492

11 San Francisco 7-8 .483

I don't know what's more depressing; losing to 2 of the 4 teams picking in front of us or picking before the Raiders.

[tuckahoeskin]

Originally Posted by MadDog97

We could trade down for more picks, but still focus on the OL. Then again, I have been making this arguement for years.

Shame of it is, many of us have been saying the same thing. The problem is, come draft time, Snyder falls in love with the flash.

I just heard a commercial on the radio for a free-style motocross show coming to Richmond sometime soon. It was a typical crappy motocross/drag racing commercial with the dramatic announcer and repetitve phrases. Listening to this, the thought hit me that this is the type of thing that must be running through Snyders head when he falls in love with a flashy player. "Take him, take him, take him!!!" All the excitement of the moment, but nothing worthy to show.

I've said it before, like many others have, if Snyder is as big a fan for as long as he claims, how could could not understand the importance of a dominant offensive line? He must be the Slingblade of billionaires.

[warpaint]

Originally Posted by hogs86

So as now we have the #5 pick.

December 29, 2009

(F indicates coin flip required to break tie; Note opposition W-L % based on all 16 opponents this season)

#
Team
W-L
Opp W-L %

1 St. Louis 1-14.525

2 Detroit 2-13 .517

3 Kansas City 3-12 .521

4Tampa Bay 3-12 .558

5 Washington 4-11 .500

6 Cleveland 4-11 .504

7 Seattle 5-10 .475

8 Buffalo 5-10 .517

9 Oakland 5-10 .521

10 Denver (from Chicago) 6-9 .492

11 San Francisco 7-8 .483

ok not 100% sure of this but i think it goes like this with the first tie breaker and that is determined by the division record,since we are 0 and 6 ,we will draft before all the teams with a five win record regardless of what we do sunday because all of the 5 win team have won at least one division game,
both of the 12 and 3 teams have at least one division win, so should they win
sunday and we lose we will draft before they do , so the way i see it if we lose sunday and k.c and tampa loses, we will get the third pick , so i do think we have an excellent chance of getting at least the 4th pick. the 0 for 6 division record is huge for us .

[BIGREDSKINSFAN1963]

Originally Posted by IH Brave

I think Sam Bradford will be good. However there's no point in the Redskins bringing him in with no O-line.

sam bradford stinks!he has a bum shoulder on top of it too.if the skins pick him it will be like vinny never left!!!
i hope they keep campbell and sign an o lineman.

[44 goes 50 gut]

Originally Posted by Fathead

I'd rather see the giants win the superbowl every year than help Dallass in any possible way.

Ditto never felt the same hatred for the Giants or Eagles, not even a close thing.