Go Back   hailRedskins.com Fan Board > hailRedskins.com Fan Forums > the Cherokee Redskins Tribe

View Poll Results: Who's the Starter for the Redskins next Season?
Luck - we trade the Colts a kings ransom 1 1.14%
RGIII - we trade up with slightly less than a kings ransom 39 44.32%
Peytom Manning - we swallow his salary and hope for a couple years of injury free HOF play 8 9.09%
Stay at #6 or even trade down to the next level of QB in first round 19 21.59%
Flynn - get him fairly cheap and use draft picks and FA to build the team 21 23.86%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #271  
Old 02-23-2012, 08:14 PM
Keino's Avatar
Keino Keino is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lavar703 View Post
However NE had a valid excuse due to Brady's injury. GB is simply tagging Flynn to try and deal him and unless I'm mistaken this is actual in violation of what teams are allowed to use the franchise tag for? The franchise tag is a joke and should've been abolished.
The tag is a mechanism for owners to control player movement. That's what it has always been. N.E.'s use to me isn't at all different. They were faced with losing the guy to f /a and used the tag to ensure that they got something in return. In this instance, Flynn is either going to get a starting gig somewhere or make more money in one season as a backup than he has made in his whole career. Not too shabby.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsSwag2 View Post
Long will never start for us and neither will the kid from stanford. We fot fleecsd .....moses wont start either there is a reason he fell so far. Sosorry this draft has disaster written all over it
Just so I don't forget, I intend to remind the above poster about this quote.
Reply With Quote

  #272  
Old 02-23-2012, 08:44 PM
Red Bear Red Bear is offline
Ghost Dancer
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 3,980
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keino View Post
The tag is a mechanism for owners to control player movement. That's what it has always been. N.E.'s use to me isn't at all different. They were faced with losing the guy to f /a and used the tag to ensure that they got something in return. In this instance, Flynn is either going to get a starting gig somewhere or make more money in one season as a backup than he has made in his whole career. Not too shabby.
I'm sure Flynn doesn't so much mind making that kind of money as a backup, although i think Flynn really wants a shot at starting for another team. but it could create problems with him making more than Rodgers. If i am Flynn i sign the franchise tag right away and gain all the leverage. First it guarantees him a high salary, no team in their right mind is going to pay that for a backup when the starter doesnt even make that much. It forces the Packers to trade him to a team thats gonna give him a chance to start. and since it forces the Packers to trade him, it will probably lower his trade value...atleast thats how i view it...
Reply With Quote

  #273  
Old 02-24-2012, 08:12 AM
Keino's Avatar
Keino Keino is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bear View Post
I'm sure Flynn doesn't so much mind making that kind of money as a backup, although i think Flynn really wants a shot at starting for another team. but it could create problems with him making more than Rodgers. If i am Flynn i sign the franchise tag right away and gain all the leverage. First it guarantees him a high salary, no team in their right mind is going to pay that for a backup when the starter doesnt even make that much. It forces the Packers to trade him to a team thats gonna give him a chance to start. and since it forces the Packers to trade him, it will probably lower his trade value...atleast thats how i view it...
I think you touch on why Flynn won't do that. It will be easier to get a deal done and negotiate a new contract with a new team if the Franchise salary isn't hanging out there. If I am him, I give it until late March and if I can't get something done, I sign the tender before GB can revoke it that way they cannot leave him tagged and then revoke it in June or July when the market isn't as attractive for him to try and get a starting gig somewhere. If I am Flynn, I would definitely want my situation settled before the Draft takes place in April be it starter for a new team or GB's high-priced back-up.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsSwag2 View Post
Long will never start for us and neither will the kid from stanford. We fot fleecsd .....moses wont start either there is a reason he fell so far. Sosorry this draft has disaster written all over it
Just so I don't forget, I intend to remind the above poster about this quote.
Reply With Quote

  #274  
Old 02-24-2012, 01:04 PM
Burgundy&Gold Burgundy&Gold is offline
Papoose
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tarboro, NC
Posts: 1
Default

I think we should go get Peyton Manning and draft Justin Blackmon. We can get Matt Barkley next year.
Reply With Quote

  #275  
Old 02-24-2012, 02:27 PM
AustinSkin's Avatar
AustinSkin AustinSkin is offline
Ghost Dancer
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austin, TX - Live Music Capitol of the World
Posts: 3,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burgundy&Gold View Post
I think we should go get Peyton Manning and draft Justin Blackmon. We can get Matt Barkley next year.
Welcome to the forum. I hate the idea of sucking one more year for a chance at the top QB.

I like the idea of Blackmon and Weeden though.
Reply With Quote

  #276  
Old 02-24-2012, 05:15 PM
NCskinsfanatic's Avatar
NCskinsfanatic NCskinsfanatic is offline
Moderator / 3 PEAT [2010-2011-2012] hR Fantasy NBA Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tarboro, North Carolina
Posts: 15,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinSkin View Post
Welcome to the forum. I hate the idea of sucking one more year for a chance at the top QB.

I like the idea of Blackmon and Weeden though.
Speaking of Weeden here's a little info from a recent interview:

http://www.hogshaven.com/2012/2/24/2...-the-shanahans
__________________
Jeff Bostic
... on running the 50-gut 9 straight times against the Cowboys

"After three or four, in the huddle I said to Russ, 'Play along with me,' " Bostic said. "I got to the line, and I said to Randy White, 'Our coaching staff loves you. We're going to run it over you again.' Then on the next play Russ told him. Randy wasn't very happy, but after three or four times, he didn't say a word."
Reply With Quote

  #277  
Old 02-24-2012, 05:16 PM
NCskinsfanatic's Avatar
NCskinsfanatic NCskinsfanatic is offline
Moderator / 3 PEAT [2010-2011-2012] hR Fantasy NBA Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tarboro, North Carolina
Posts: 15,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burgundy&Gold View Post
I think we should go get Peyton Manning and draft Justin Blackmon. We can get Matt Barkley next year.
Welcome aboard Jay and HTTR my friend!
__________________
Jeff Bostic
... on running the 50-gut 9 straight times against the Cowboys

"After three or four, in the huddle I said to Russ, 'Play along with me,' " Bostic said. "I got to the line, and I said to Randy White, 'Our coaching staff loves you. We're going to run it over you again.' Then on the next play Russ told him. Randy wasn't very happy, but after three or four times, he didn't say a word."
Reply With Quote

  #278  
Old 02-24-2012, 07:34 PM
Emmanouel8's Avatar
Emmanouel8 Emmanouel8 is offline
Medicine Man
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,643
Default

Tarboro in the house... we finally have documentation there's more than one resident there
Reply With Quote

  #279  
Old 02-24-2012, 08:03 PM
NCskinsfanatic's Avatar
NCskinsfanatic NCskinsfanatic is offline
Moderator / 3 PEAT [2010-2011-2012] hR Fantasy NBA Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tarboro, North Carolina
Posts: 15,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmanouel8 View Post
Tarboro in the house... we finally have documentation there's more than one resident there
lmao...run tell that!
__________________
Jeff Bostic
... on running the 50-gut 9 straight times against the Cowboys

"After three or four, in the huddle I said to Russ, 'Play along with me,' " Bostic said. "I got to the line, and I said to Randy White, 'Our coaching staff loves you. We're going to run it over you again.' Then on the next play Russ told him. Randy wasn't very happy, but after three or four times, he didn't say a word."
Reply With Quote

  #280  
Old 02-25-2012, 08:45 AM
colkurtz's Avatar
colkurtz colkurtz is offline
Spirit
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, PA
Posts: 9,384
Default

Getting Tannehill or Weeden is a weak Plan B. First we have to trade down as far as we can in Round 1, then draft either one. Even if we trade down below #10 picking either of these QB will look like we overpaid for them. Then we can then draft the best OT, followed by the best big WR, then another OL.

Concentrating on the OL in FA / Draft will end that excuse for the next QB. Getting a Big, X-type WR, the return of Davis and a fully recovered Cooley will get our WR/TE group into reasonable shape.

Then we will see how Tannehill and weeden do. their play will be compared to P. Manning, Flynn, Luck and RGIII. We would have to go 8-8 or better. Either of these QB would have to be average or above. Anything less will make shanahan look bad. The press and fans will howl for Shanahan's head if he doesn't do well this season with a Plan B QB. Three seasons and 4 QB failures will cause Snyder and Allen to seriously question Shanahan's ability as a HC.
Reply With Quote

  #281  
Old 02-25-2012, 09:51 AM
shally's Avatar
shally shally is offline
Grumpy Old Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: new orleans, now the palm springs of washington
Posts: 59,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colkurtz View Post
Getting Tannehill or Weeden is a weak Plan B. First we have to trade down as far as we can in Round 1, then draft either one. Even if we trade down below #10 picking either of these QB will look like we overpaid for them. Then we can then draft the best OT, followed by the best big WR, then another OL.

Concentrating on the OL in FA / Draft will end that excuse for the next QB. Getting a Big, X-type WR, the return of Davis and a fully recovered Cooley will get our WR/TE group into reasonable shape.

Then we will see how Tannehill and weeden do. their play will be compared to P. Manning, Flynn, Luck and RGIII. We would have to go 8-8 or better. Either of these QB would have to be average or above. Anything less will make shanahan look bad. The press and fans will howl for Shanahan's head if he doesn't do well this season with a Plan B QB. Three seasons and 4 QB failures will cause Snyder and Allen to seriously question Shanahan's ability as a HC.

really like the maturity and candor that BOTH Weedon and RGIII showed in their interviews.. a couple of very classy guys
__________________
Reply With Quote

  #282  
Old 02-25-2012, 10:12 AM
AustinSkin's Avatar
AustinSkin AustinSkin is offline
Ghost Dancer
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Austin, TX - Live Music Capitol of the World
Posts: 3,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shally View Post
really like the maturity and candor that BOTH Weedon and RGIII showed in their interviews.. a couple of very classy guys
Liked the maturity, confidence and sense of humor.

One big question is that he said he was never hit at OK State. He's going to get hit plenty unless our line turns into an unstoppable wall. How he responds to getting hammered will be telling.
Reply With Quote

  #283  
Old 02-25-2012, 10:25 AM
colkurtz's Avatar
colkurtz colkurtz is offline
Spirit
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, PA
Posts: 9,384
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shally View Post
really like the maturity and candor that BOTH Weedon and RGIII showed in their interviews.. a couple of very classy guys
You'd expect that from Weeden, since he is 28. If we went into a Plan B mode [not bidding up for RGIII, no P. Manning, nor Flynn] I could see us drafting him with our second pick. In that case we'd either take the BPA at OT or WR in the first round.
Reply With Quote

  #284  
Old 03-05-2012, 09:08 PM
44 goes 50 gut 44 goes 50 gut is offline
Brave
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,139
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keino View Post
Franchising a F/A back-up QB when there is a clear trade market for his services isn't stupid at all. Franchising a Back-up TE....Now that's Stupid.
As I expected Flynn was not franchised. No one should have expected him to be.

Franchising Fred Davis on the other hand is a very smart (nearly text book) use of the tag. First of all relatively low top salaries among TE's make the money affordable. Second of all the big question mark surrounding his pot smoking and ability to not do it again before he's tested multiple times this coming season make a longer term deal prohibitive. He's clearly a very talented player that baring another weed smoking incident they would love to keep. Considering it's the only position on the team that has starter talent at both starter and backup. Also considering how the Pats have shown how much of a matchup problem two talented TE's can be, if the Skins could even manage to find one impact WR, they could do some of the same two TE sets and lead to the Skins fielding matchup problems for the first time in years. If all that isn't enough, who else were they going to tag? Laron "Muscle Head" Landry and his rubber band Achilles that he refused to get fixed even after the best Achilles guy in the country told him to? You heard Carlos Rodgers, Landry is another guy who "wants out" (and also just like Rodgers probably resents the Redskins for paying him a lot of money to be a big disappointment)...
Reply With Quote

  #285  
Old 03-06-2012, 08:00 AM
Keino's Avatar
Keino Keino is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 44 goes 50 gut View Post
As I expected Flynn was not franchised. No one should have expected him to be.

Franchising Fred Davis on the other hand is a very smart (nearly text book) use of the tag. First of all relatively low top salaries among TE's make the money affordable. Second of all the big question mark surrounding his pot smoking and ability to not do it again before he's tested multiple times this coming season make a longer term deal prohibitive. He's clearly a very talented player that baring another weed smoking incident they would love to keep. Considering it's the only position on the team that has starter talent at both starter and backup. Also considering how the Pats have shown how much of a matchup problem two talented TE's can be, if the Skins could even manage to find one impact WR, they could do some of the same two TE sets and lead to the Skins fielding matchup problems for the first time in years. If all that isn't enough, who else were they going to tag? Laron "Muscle Head" Landry and his rubber band Achilles that he refused to get fixed even after the best Achilles guy in the country told him to? You heard Carlos Rodgers, Landry is another guy who "wants out" (and also just like Rodgers probably resents the Redskins for paying him a lot of money to be a big disappointment)...
It's very easy to wait until an event occurs and then say "I knew that would/wouldn't happen".

The logic for franchising Flynn was based on a recently established precedent concerning a back-up who performs well in limited action set to become a free agent. In recent years, such players have fetched some trade value and the team used the franchise tag to ensure they got something in return. It's very possible that the Pack had other areas of concern for which they would use the tag or didn't want to commit, even for a short period of time, the cap space to carry a QB franchise tag or they may have simply not wanted to give their back-up a higher salary than their starter. In addition, perhaps they simply didn't want to be accused of violating the recently negotiated CBA by using the franchise tag with the intention of trading someone (something I think would be hard to prove, but perhaps they didn't want the headache).

As for franchising Davis, I didn't know there was a rule that says a team HAS to use the franchise tag on any player. That sentence should sufficiently dispose of the argument I didn't make (using the tag instead on Landry, since I have advocated not re-signing him). I think it's a dumb move for a number of reasons: The Pot issue is an issue. That he was caught and continued to smoke and piss dirty says alot about his intelligence, dedication to his craft and conscientiousness. Secondly, his career year came in a contract year. There are a ton of examples (notably....Haynesworth, Albert) of players who have that breakout year in a contract year get paid and severely drop-off. For someone who already had motivation issues, who doesn't help those issues by smoking pot in-season, this is a major red-flag. Finally, while New England has shown everyone how using 2 TEs can be valuable, it's hard to argue that Fred is as good or better than either of Hernandez or Gronkowski. Moreover, finding TEs with Davis' skill-set (Decent speed, Decent hands, average to mediocre blocker) is not really that difficult to do. In the thread dedicated to the franchising Davis issue, I listed off the top of my head, 15 or so TEs that I would take over Davis, or who have out-performed Davis in every measurable way. It is for these reasons I feel that using the tag on Davis is a bad idea. A good idea is to make him a reasonable, incentive laden 2-3 year deal, with the ability to recoup bonus etc. in the event of a drug suspension and allow him to test the market and if he got a team to throw significant dollars at him, then thank him for his time in Washington, wish him luck and allow him to walk. It doesn't matter to me that the TE franchise number isn't that high, Davis doesn't deserve it and should not be rewarded for his selfish behavior.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsSwag2 View Post
Long will never start for us and neither will the kid from stanford. We fot fleecsd .....moses wont start either there is a reason he fell so far. Sosorry this draft has disaster written all over it
Just so I don't forget, I intend to remind the above poster about this quote.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | New Posts |