|
View Poll Results: Stronest Ticket?
|
|
Sen. Evan Bayh (Indiana)
|
 
|
1 |
10.00% |
|
Sen. John Edwards (North Carolina)
|
 
|
5 |
50.00% |
|
Sen. Dick Gephardt (Missouri)
|
 
|
2 |
20.00% |
|
Sen. Bob Graham (Florida)
|
 
|
1 |
10.00% |
|
Sen. Bill Nelson (Florida)
|
 
|
0 |
0% |
|
Gov. Bill Richardson (New Mexico)
|
 
|
1 |
10.00% |
 |
Strongest Democratic Veep? |
 |

03-11-2004, 01:23 AM
|
 |
Scalper
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 717
|
|
Strongest Democratic Veep?
Which Democratic runningmate would be the strongest? I left off Hillary and McCain because I view both as easy media stories as opposed to viable options.
__________________
erp
Last edited by Ford : 03-11-2004 at 01:30 AM.
|

03-11-2004, 03:21 AM
|
 |
Brave
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Internet
Posts: 1,130
|
|
McCain won't run with Kerry...Edwards is the sexy pick...but I think it will be a Midwesterner; my best guess is Gephardt: can win Ohio and won’t upstage Kerry. I will, however, change my opinion in the next few weeks. Graham is also a good guess as well.
|

03-11-2004, 08:15 AM
|
 |
Great Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Shippensburg PA
Posts: 21,176
|
|
considering Florida polls right now are Kerry 49/Bush 47, Graham woudl be the knock out blow in Florida. I think a Kerry/Graham ticket woudl win. Now, will that happen? Probably not. I think alot of this is just goign through the process, i think Edwards is already the man.
|

03-11-2004, 08:31 AM
|
 |
Great Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C.
Posts: 23,823
|
|
I went with Edwards because he is now a seasoned campaigner and recent polls in North Carolina and Tennessee indicate those states are, rather unexpectedly, very much in play for the Democratic ticket in 2004. Graham would be a nice, solid pick, too.
You're correct to disqualify McCain and Hillary Clinton, Dan. They are just media stories, as you stated. The Hillary Clinton thing is just whipped up constantly by the GOP because they know it agitates all those dittoheads. I've got as much chance to be on the ticket in 2004 as Hillary Clinton does.
|

03-11-2004, 08:46 AM
|
 |
Shaman
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Heartland of the Jersey Shore!
Posts: 6,147
|
|
I'm not sure, but selected Gephardt . . .
Old school, long time politico, stable ? ? ?
__________________
"If you aren't fired with enthusiasm, you will be fired with enthusiasm." Vincent Thomas Lombardi (1913 - 1970)
|

03-11-2004, 10:37 AM
|
 |
Hunter
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 416
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by NamVet4
I'm not sure, but selected Gephardt . . .
Old school, long time politico, stable ? ? ?
|
I think those are all negatives in this case. Given Kerry's long history in federal politics, I think the Dems would be better off to go with a governor or a recently elected rep. Furthermore, the Edwards advantage can be had without putting him on the ticket. He'll only reap major gains in a couple of southern states and those same advantages can be had simply by having him campaign there.
I know its a long shot, but I think former Sen. Robb could be very interesting. He's been out of the Senate long enough, and his recent appointment to the 9/11 commission by Bush makes it harder for the Republicans to attack him.
|

03-11-2004, 02:41 PM
|
 |
Great Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C.
Posts: 23,823
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrWiggles
I know its a long shot, but I think former Sen. Robb could be very interesting. He's been out of the Senate long enough, and his recent appointment to the 9/11 commission by Bush makes it harder for the Republicans to attack him.
|
I think Robb's extracurricular sex activities will keep him away from national politics for the rest of his life.
|

03-11-2004, 02:55 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lawn Guyland, NY (my heart will always be in Arlington, Va)
Posts: 24,496
|
|
He's too conservative to take any votes from Bush anyways.
__________________
The future is now.
|

03-11-2004, 03:36 PM
|
 |
hR Staff Writer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Monty Burns County
Posts: 61,242
|
|
Edwards would be the best pick for Kerry; he would get three southern states for Kerry
__________________
Thanks for everything Johnny White Guy.
|

03-11-2004, 04:39 PM
|
 |
Hunter
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 416
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Spence
I think Robb's extracurricular sex activities will keep him away from national politics for the rest of his life.
|
As long as there aren't any new indisrections (and lord only knows about that), I think that could be filed under old news. Regardless, it is an extreme long shot.
|

03-11-2004, 06:17 PM
|
 |
Scalper
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 717
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Yudolindo
McCain won't run with Kerry...Edwards is the sexy pick...but I think it will be a Midwesterner; my best guess is Gephardt: can win Ohio and won’t upstage Kerry. I will, however, change my opinion in the next few weeks. Graham is also a good guess as well.
|
I don't know that I buy into VP candidates winning states based on geography .. but I strongly disagree that Gephardt would pick up midwestern states. I mean .. c'mon .. he camped out in Iowa and based ALL of his presidential hopes on winning it. Off the top of my head .. if I remember the #'s right it was:
Kerry - 38%
Edwards - 32%
Dean - 18%
Gephardt - 11% or thereabouts
__________________
erp
|

03-12-2004, 12:53 PM
|
 |
Scalper
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 717
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Yudolindo
McCain won't run with Kerry...Edwards is the sexy pick...but I think it will be a Midwesterner; my best guess is Gephardt: can win Ohio and won’t upstage Kerry. I will, however, change my opinion in the next few weeks. Graham is also a good guess as well.
|
I do appreciate a republican comin over and talkin democratic strategy though, no reason this thread has to be restricted to democrats, and i appreciate the cordiality 
__________________
erp
|

03-12-2004, 11:49 PM
|
 |
Warrior
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UMass via Bethesda
Posts: 2,561
|
|
i dont want edwards to be a vp. for some reason i like richardson. even though graham would make the most sense. i really liked graham early on before he dropped out. has no charisma though.
|

03-13-2004, 11:11 AM
|
 |
Great Spirit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C.
Posts: 23,823
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by suppitty
i really liked graham early on before he dropped out. has no charisma though.
|
At least he'd be paired against a guy [Dick "the walking corpse" Cheney] with even less charisma than Graham has.
|

03-15-2004, 12:54 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lawn Guyland, NY (my heart will always be in Arlington, Va)
Posts: 24,496
|
|
That's absurd Tom, we all know Cheney doesn't really exist. 
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM. |
|
|
|